Paper Profile

Elicits the author's paper positioning once, stores it in .paper-memory/profile.yml, and lets every other skill read it so the whole toolkit behaves context-awarely instead of asking the same questions over and over. This is the "ask me about my paper" front door: a short, optioned interview, then a small validated YAML file the rest of the repo consumes.

It is a copilot, not an oracle. The profile records your stated intent (what kind of paper this is, who it's for, how bold you want to be). It does not judge whether the science is good and it never predicts acceptance.

When to use

• "Set up my paper profile" / "ask me about my paper" / "what verticals?"
• Starting a new paper and wanting the toolkit tuned before drafting.
• "Remember my writing style / positioning across skills."
• Any other skill notices .paper-memory/profile.yml is missing and you want

to create it so that skill can personalize.

• Re-run any time the positioning changes (e.g. you drop down a venue tier, or

pivot from systems to empirical framing).

Inputs

• The user's paper working directory (where they want .paper-memory/ to

live). This is the user's paper repo, not this skills repo.

• The user's answers to the interview (you ask; they pick). Nothing else is

required — there is no network call and no file the user must pre-create.

• Optional: an existing .paper-memory/profile.yml to update instead of

starting fresh.

Process

1. Locate the paper directory and the memory dir. Confirm with the user

where their paper lives; the profile goes in <paper-dir>/.paper-memory/. If one already exists, load and show it (profile_io.py show) and offer to update rather than overwrite.

1. Show the option menu, then interview. Print the blank template so the

user sees the choices, then ask through them. Get the exact vocabulary from the script so you never invent a value: python3 scripts/profile_io.py schema. Ask in this order, always offering the options and a one-line gloss of each (full descriptions live in [references/positioning-axes.md](references/positioning-axes.md)):

- vertical / emphasis (required): systems | theory | applied | empirical | survey | position. "Is the heart of the paper a built artifact, a proof, a domain application, a measurement study, a synthesis, or an argument?" - contributiontype (required): method | system | theory | dataset | empirical | application | survey | position. - audience: specialists | broad-field | practitioners | interdisciplinary. - venuetier (required): top | specialized | regional | journal | workshop | preprint | undecided; plus any concrete targetvenues (e.g. sigspatial-2026). - riskappetite (required): safe | balanced | ambitious. "Defend a tight incremental delta, or stake a big claim and accept polarized reviews?" - writingpreferences: person (we/I/impersonal/venue-default), tone, notation (heavy/light), britishspelling; plus preferredterms and avoidterms. - context: prior_papers (paths/ids, for match-style), constraints (hard deadline, must stay anonymized, no new experiments).

Offer a sensible default for each and let the user accept it. Do not force every field — only the four required ones must be set.

1. Write and validate. Persist the answers with one call. The script

validates against the closed vocabulary and stamps the date; it refuses to write an out-of-vocabulary value (so a typo can't silently corrupt the file that every other skill trusts):

`` python3 scripts/profileio.py write <paper-dir>/.paper-memory/profile.yml \ --field vertical=systems --field contributiontype=system \ --field venuetier=top --field riskappetite=ambitious \ --field audience=broad-field \ --field wp.person=first-person-we --field wp.tone=assertive \ --field target_venues="sigspatial-2026, vldb-2027" \ --field constraints="hard deadline 2026-08-01, no new experiments" ``

Use --from <existing> to update in place, repeated --field to set each answer, comma-separated values for list fields, and wp.<key>=... for the nested writing preferences. Re-validate any hand-edited file with python3 scripts/profile_io.py validate <path>.

1. Set up .gitignore (ask first). .paper-memory/ is local — it holds

the author's private positioning and accumulated lessons. Recommend adding .paper-memory/ to the paper repo's .gitignore unless the user deliberately wants to version it (e.g. to share positioning with co-authors). State the choice; let the user decide.

1. Explain how downstream skills consume it. Tell the user concretely what

changes now that the profile exists (see the table below and [references/downstream-consumption.md](references/downstream-consumption.md)). The point of the interview is that they won't be re-asked.

1. Mention the rest of .paper-memory/. This skill owns profile.yml.

The same directory also accumulates lessons.md (deduped, dated lessons other skills append when they catch something, and read at start to avoid repeating advice) and decisions.md (venue/track/positioning decisions with rationale). See [the shared .paper-memory/ convention](references/paper-memory-convention.md) for the file formats and memory-hygiene rules. This skill does not write those two files; it just establishes the directory and explains them.

How downstream skills consume the profile

These skills should degrade gracefully: if profile.yml is absent they ask the user (or use venue defaults) as they do today. The profile removes the re-asking; it is never a hard dependency.

Output

• <paper-dir>/.paper-memory/profile.yml — a small validated YAML file

(schema v1). Required: vertical, contributiontype, venuetier, risk_appetite. Optional everything else.

• A short plain-English recap of the positioning and the concrete behavior

changes in the skills the user is likely to run next.

Adapt to your discipline

The positioning axes are CS-flavored (systems/theory/empirical, conference tiers, double-blind constraints). For other fields, edit the vocabularies at the top of scripts/profileio.py (e.g. add clinical-trial or humanities-essay verticals, swap venue tiers for journal quartiles) — the validator and emitter are data-driven, so new disciplines need new tokens, not new code. Bump SCHEMAVERSION if you change required fields.

Guardrails

• Never invent a vocabulary value. Pull the allowed values from

profile_io.py schema; the writer rejects anything else so the file every other skill trusts can't be silently corrupted.

• Never decide for the user. Offer options and a default; the author picks

their own positioning and risk appetite. Don't infer "ambitious" because the topic sounds exciting.

• Local and private. .paper-memory/ is never uploaded anywhere; always

offer the .gitignore line and respect the user's versioning choice.

• This skill is configuration, not authorship. It records intent. It does

not write paper content, predict acceptance, or submit anything.

• Keep this file under 500 lines; references/ go one level deep only.