npx skills add smithery/rohunj --skill test-and-break
rohunj/claude-build-workflow · Archived
test-and-break
Autonomous testing skill that opens a deployed app, goes through user flows, tries to break things, and writes detailed bug reports. Use after deploying to staging. Triggers on: test the app, find bugs, QA the deployment, break the app, test staging.
Installation
npx skills add rohunj/claude-build-workflow --skill test-and-break
Stronger alternatives
This repository is archived — consider an actively maintained alternative.
Compound Engineering workflow for AI-assisted development.
60 installsAnalyze a PRD for edge cases, failure modes, and scenarios that might be missed. Use after crea…
46 installsReview user stories for quality, proper sizing, sequencing, and acceptance criteria. Use before…
13 installsConvert bug reports into prd.json user stories for autonomous fixing. Use after running test-an…
10 installsSimilar popular skills
Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.
Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, includ…
810.4K installsPostgres best practices maintained by Supabase, for Postgres running anywhere. Load this skill …
391.6K installsReview UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "chec…
617.3K installsBuild, deploy, evaluate, optimize, fine-tune, and manage Microsoft Foundry agents, models, and …
576.5K installsDebug Azure production issues on Azure using AppLens, Azure Monitor, resource health, and safe …
568.9K installsAlso in this package
Other skills from rohunj/claude-build-workflow · top by installs.
npx skills add rohunj/claude-build-workflow
More details
Agent compatibility
Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.
Also listed on
Alternate registries and mirrors of this skill.
Repository health
main
Package contents
Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.
-
skill md
SKILL.md6,284 B -
docs
SUMMARY.md272 B
History
- First seen on skills.sh
- First recorded snapshot · 14 installs
SKILL.md
Test and Break
Systematically test a deployed application by going through user flows, trying edge cases, and attempting to break things. Outputs structured bug reports that can be converted to user stories for autonomous fixing.
Prerequisites
- agent-browser installed (
npm install -g agent-browser && agent-browser install) - App deployed to a URL (staging/preview)
- Basic understanding of what the app should do (read the PRD)
The Job
- Read the PRD to understand what the app should do
- Open the deployed app in agent-browser
- Go through each major user flow
- Try to break things at each step
- Document all bugs and issues found
- Output structured bug reports
Testing Process
Step 1: Understand the App
Read tasks/prd.md and tasks/architecture.md to understand:
- What user flows exist
- What the app should do
- What the expected behavior is
Step 2: Open the App
agent-browser open [DEPLOYMENT_URL]
agent-browser snapshot -i
Step 3: Test Each User Flow
For each major feature/flow in the PRD:
A. Happy Path Testing
- Go through the flow as a normal user would
- Verify each step works as expected
- Check that success states appear correctly
B. Edge Case Testing
Try these at each input/interaction point:
Input Edge Cases:
- Empty inputs (submit with nothing)
- Very long text (500+ characters)
- Special characters (
<script>alert('xss')</script>,'; DROP TABLE users;--) - Unicode/emojis (🎉, 中文, العربية)
- Negative numbers where positive expected
- Zero where non-zero expected
- Future dates, past dates, invalid dates
- Invalid email formats
- Spaces only
- Leading/trailing whitespace
Interaction Edge Cases:
- Double-click buttons rapidly
- Click back button during operations
- Refresh page mid-flow
- Open same page in multiple tabs
- Submit form twice quickly
State Edge Cases:
- Log out mid-operation (if auth exists)
- Let session expire
- Navigate directly to URLs that require prior steps
- Use browser back/forward buttons
Visual/UX Issues:
- Check mobile responsiveness (resize browser)
- Look for overlapping elements
- Check loading states exist
- Verify error messages are helpful
- Look for console errors
Step 4: Document Each Bug
For each issue found, document:
## BUG-XXX: [Short descriptive title]
**Severity:** Critical | High | Medium | Low
**Type:** Functional | UI/UX | Security | Performance | Accessibility
**Steps to Reproduce:**
1. Go to [URL]
2. Do [action]
3. Enter [input]
4. Click [button]
**Expected Behavior:**
[What should happen]
**Actual Behavior:**
[What actually happens]
**Screenshot:** [if applicable]
**Console Errors:** [if any]
**Notes:** [any additional context]
Severity Guidelines
| Severity | Definition | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | App broken, data loss, security issue | Crash, XSS vulnerability, data not saving |
| High | Major feature broken, bad UX | Can't complete main flow, confusing errors |
| Medium | Feature works but has issues | Minor validation missing, UI glitches |
| Low | Polish/minor issues | Typos, slight misalignment, minor UX |
Output Format
Save bug report to tasks/bug-report-[date].md:
# Bug Report: [App Name]
**Tested:** [Date]
**URL:** [Deployment URL]
**Tester:** Claude (Automated)
## Summary
- Total bugs found: X
- Critical: X
- High: X
- Medium: X
- Low: X
## Critical Bugs
[List critical bugs first]
## High Priority Bugs
[List high bugs]
## Medium Priority Bugs
[List medium bugs]
## Low Priority Bugs
[List low bugs]
## Positive Findings
[List things that worked well - important for context]
## Recommendations
[Overall suggestions for improvement]
Converting Bugs to User Stories
After generating the bug report, convert each bug to a user story format:
{
"id": "BUG-001",
"title": "Fix: [Bug title]",
"description": "As a user, I expect [expected behavior] but currently [actual behavior].",
"acceptanceCriteria": [
"Specific fix criterion 1",
"Specific fix criterion 2",
"Regression test: [original bug steps] no longer reproduces",
"Typecheck passes"
],
"priority": 1,
"passes": false,
"notes": "Original bug: [reference]"
}
Priority mapping:
- Critical bugs → priority 1-2
- High bugs → priority 3-5
- Medium bugs → priority 6-10
- Low bugs → priority 11+
Integration with Ralph
After generating bug stories, they can be:
- Added to existing prd.json - Append bug fixes to current project
- Create new prd.json - Start a bug-fix-only Ralph run
To add to existing prd.json:
# Read current max priority
MAX_PRIORITY=$(cat prd.json | jq '[.userStories[].priority] | max')
# Add bug stories starting after max priority
# (Claude should do this programmatically)
Example Testing Session
# 1. Open the app
agent-browser open https://my-app-staging.vercel.app
# 2. Take initial snapshot
agent-browser snapshot -i
# 3. Test login flow
agent-browser fill @e1 "[email protected]"
agent-browser fill @e2 "password123"
agent-browser click @e3
agent-browser wait --load networkidle
agent-browser snapshot -i
# 4. Try to break it
agent-browser fill @e1 "" # empty email
agent-browser click @e3 # submit anyway
agent-browser snapshot -i # check error handling
# 5. Try XSS
agent-browser fill @e1 "<script>alert('xss')</script>"
agent-browser snapshot -i
# Continue testing other flows...
Checklist
Before finishing testing:
- Tested all user flows from PRD
- Tried empty inputs on all forms
- Tried special characters/XSS on all inputs
- Checked mobile responsiveness
- Looked for console errors
- Verified error messages are helpful
- Documented all bugs with reproduction steps
- Assigned severity to each bug
- Saved bug report to tasks/bug-report-[date].md