npx skills add https://www.modelscope.cn/skills/@majiayu000/patent-claims-analyzer
robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator
patent-claims-analyzer
Automated analysis of patent claims for USPTO compliance with 35 USC 112(b) requirements - antecedent basis, definiteness, claim structure
Installation
npx skills add robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator --skill patent-claims-analyzer
Similar popular skills
Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.
Guidance for distinctive, intentional visual design when building new UI or reshaping an existi…
866.4K installsBrowser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, includ…
810.4K installsReview UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "chec…
617.3K installsBuild, deploy, evaluate, optimize, fine-tune, and manage Microsoft Foundry agents, models, and …
576.5K installsDebug Azure production issues on Azure using AppLens, Azure Monitor, resource health, and safe …
568.9K installsAlso in this package
Other skills from robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator · top by installs.
npx skills add robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator
More details
Agent compatibility
Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.
Also listed on
Alternate registries and mirrors of this skill.
Repository health
main
Package contents
Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.
-
skill md
SKILL.md4,695 B -
docs
SUMMARY.md168 B
History
- First seen on skills.sh
- First recorded snapshot · 434 installs
SKILL.md
Patent Claims Analyzer Skill
Automated analysis of patent claims for USPTO compliance with 35 USC 112(b) requirements.
When to Use
Invoke this skill when users ask to:
- Review patent claims for definiteness
- Check antecedent basis in claims
- Analyze claim structure
- Find claim drafting issues
- Validate claims before filing
- Fix USPTO office action issues related to claims
What This Skill Does
Performs comprehensive automated analysis:
- Antecedent Basis Checking:
- Finds terms used without prior introduction - Detects missing "a/an" before first use - Identifies improper "said/the" before first use - Tracks term references across claims
- Definiteness Analysis (35 USC 112(b)):
- Identifies subjective/indefinite terms - Detects relative terms without reference - Finds ambiguous claim language - Checks for clear claim boundaries
- Claim Structure Validation:
- Parses independent vs. dependent claims - Validates claim dependencies - Checks claim numbering - Identifies claim type (method, system, etc.)
- Issue Categorization:
- Critical: Must fix before filing - Important: May cause rejection - Minor: Best practice improvements
Required Data
This skill uses the automated claims analyzer from: Location: ${CLAUDEPLUGINROOT}/python\claims_analyzer.py
How to Use
When this skill is invoked:
- Load the claims analyzer:
```python import sys sys.path.insert(0, os.path.join(os.environ.get('CLAUDEPLUGINROOT', '.'), 'python')) from python.claims_analyzer import ClaimsAnalyzer
analyzer = ClaimsAnalyzer() ```
- Analyze claims:
```python claims_text = """ 1. A system comprising: a processor; a memory; and said processor configured to... """
results = analyzer.analyzeclaims(claimstext) ```
- Present analysis:
- Show compliance score (0-100) - List issues by severity (critical, important, minor) - Provide MPEP citations for each issue - Suggest specific fixes
Analysis Output Structure
{
"claim_count": 20,
"independent_count": 3,
"dependent_count": 17,
"compliance_score": 85, # 0-100
"total_issues": 12,
"critical_issues": 2,
"important_issues": 7,
"minor_issues": 3,
"issues": [
{
"category": "antecedent_basis",
"severity": "critical",
"claim_number": 1,
"term": "said processor",
"description": "Term 'processor' used with 'said' before first introduction",
"mpep_cite": "MPEP 2173.05(e)",
"suggestion": "Change 'said processor' to 'the processor' or introduce with 'a processor' first"
},
# ... more issues
]
}
Common Issues Detected
- Antecedent Basis Errors:
- Using "said/the" before "a/an" introduction - Terms appearing in dependent claims not in parent - Missing antecedent in claim body
- Definiteness Issues:
- Subjective terms: "substantially", "about", "approximately" - Relative terms: "large", "small", "thin" - Ambiguous language: "and/or", "optionally"
- Structure Issues:
- Means-plus-function without adequate structure - Improper claim dependencies - Missing preamble or transition
Presentation Format
Present analysis as:
CLAIMS ANALYSIS REPORT
======================
Summary:
- Total Claims: 20 (3 independent, 17 dependent)
- Compliance Score: 85/100
- Issues Found: 12 (2 critical, 7 important, 3 minor)
CRITICAL ISSUES (Must Fix):
[Claim 1] Antecedent Basis Error
Issue: Term 'processor' used with 'said' before introduction
Location: "said processor configured to..."
MPEP: 2173.05(e)
Fix: Change to 'the processor' or introduce with 'a processor' first
[Claim 5] Indefinite Term
Issue: Subjective term 'substantially' without definition
Location: "substantially similar to..."
MPEP: 2173.05(b)
Fix: Define 'substantially' in specification or use objective criteria
IMPORTANT ISSUES:
...
MINOR ISSUES:
...
Integration with MPEP
For each issue, the skill can:
- Search MPEP for relevant guidance
- Provide specific MPEP section citations
- Show examiner guidance on similar issues
- Suggest fixes based on USPTO practice
Tools Available
- Read: To load claims from files
- Bash: To run Python analyzer
- Write: To save analysis reports