robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator

patent-claims-analyzer

Automated analysis of patent claims for USPTO compliance with 35 USC 112(b) requirements - antecedent basis, definiteness, claim structure

First seen Jan 22, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator --skill patent-claims-analyzer

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator · top by installs.

npx skills add robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator

Browse all from robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Also listed on

Alternate registries and mirrors of this skill.

Repository health

Stars 179
License LICENSE
Default branch main
Open issues 0
Status Active

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 4,695 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 168 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 434 installs

SKILL.md

Patent Claims Analyzer Skill

Automated analysis of patent claims for USPTO compliance with 35 USC 112(b) requirements.

When to Use

Invoke this skill when users ask to:

  • Review patent claims for definiteness
  • Check antecedent basis in claims
  • Analyze claim structure
  • Find claim drafting issues
  • Validate claims before filing
  • Fix USPTO office action issues related to claims

What This Skill Does

Performs comprehensive automated analysis:

  1. Antecedent Basis Checking:

- Finds terms used without prior introduction - Detects missing "a/an" before first use - Identifies improper "said/the" before first use - Tracks term references across claims

  1. Definiteness Analysis (35 USC 112(b)):

- Identifies subjective/indefinite terms - Detects relative terms without reference - Finds ambiguous claim language - Checks for clear claim boundaries

  1. Claim Structure Validation:

- Parses independent vs. dependent claims - Validates claim dependencies - Checks claim numbering - Identifies claim type (method, system, etc.)

  1. Issue Categorization:

- Critical: Must fix before filing - Important: May cause rejection - Minor: Best practice improvements

Required Data

This skill uses the automated claims analyzer from: Location: ${CLAUDEPLUGINROOT}/python\claims_analyzer.py

How to Use

When this skill is invoked:

  1. Load the claims analyzer:

```python import sys sys.path.insert(0, os.path.join(os.environ.get('CLAUDEPLUGINROOT', '.'), 'python')) from python.claims_analyzer import ClaimsAnalyzer

analyzer = ClaimsAnalyzer() ```

  1. Analyze claims:

```python claims_text = """ 1. A system comprising: a processor; a memory; and said processor configured to... """

results = analyzer.analyzeclaims(claimstext) ```

  1. Present analysis:

- Show compliance score (0-100) - List issues by severity (critical, important, minor) - Provide MPEP citations for each issue - Suggest specific fixes

Analysis Output Structure

{
    "claim_count": 20,
    "independent_count": 3,
    "dependent_count": 17,
    "compliance_score": 85,  # 0-100
    "total_issues": 12,
    "critical_issues": 2,
    "important_issues": 7,
    "minor_issues": 3,
    "issues": [
        {
            "category": "antecedent_basis",
            "severity": "critical",
            "claim_number": 1,
            "term": "said processor",
            "description": "Term 'processor' used with 'said' before first introduction",
            "mpep_cite": "MPEP 2173.05(e)",
            "suggestion": "Change 'said processor' to 'the processor' or introduce with 'a processor' first"
        },
        # ... more issues
    ]
}

Common Issues Detected

  1. Antecedent Basis Errors:

- Using "said/the" before "a/an" introduction - Terms appearing in dependent claims not in parent - Missing antecedent in claim body

  1. Definiteness Issues:

- Subjective terms: "substantially", "about", "approximately" - Relative terms: "large", "small", "thin" - Ambiguous language: "and/or", "optionally"

  1. Structure Issues:

- Means-plus-function without adequate structure - Improper claim dependencies - Missing preamble or transition

Presentation Format

Present analysis as:

CLAIMS ANALYSIS REPORT
======================

Summary:
- Total Claims: 20 (3 independent, 17 dependent)
- Compliance Score: 85/100
- Issues Found: 12 (2 critical, 7 important, 3 minor)

CRITICAL ISSUES (Must Fix):

[Claim 1] Antecedent Basis Error
  Issue: Term 'processor' used with 'said' before introduction
  Location: "said processor configured to..."
  MPEP: 2173.05(e)
  Fix: Change to 'the processor' or introduce with 'a processor' first

[Claim 5] Indefinite Term
  Issue: Subjective term 'substantially' without definition
  Location: "substantially similar to..."
  MPEP: 2173.05(b)
  Fix: Define 'substantially' in specification or use objective criteria

IMPORTANT ISSUES:
...

MINOR ISSUES:
...

Integration with MPEP

For each issue, the skill can:

  1. Search MPEP for relevant guidance
  2. Provide specific MPEP section citations
  3. Show examiner guidance on similar issues
  4. Suggest fixes based on USPTO practice

Tools Available

  • Read: To load claims from files
  • Bash: To run Python analyzer
  • Write: To save analysis reports