General branch review

git diff --stat origin/main...HEAD   # scope first
git diff origin/main...HEAD

Read the changed files in full — a hunk is rarely enough to judge correctness. Look for:

• Bugs — logic errors, DropWithContext values not released on every exit path (the

fix is deferdrop!/DropGuard, not more dropwith calls), borrow/aliasing mistakes, unhandled error paths.

• CPython divergence — different results, exception types or messages, missing

attributes. Check anything you're unsure of with python-playground.

• Sandbox escapes — sandboxed code reaching the host filesystem, environment,

network or subprocesses.

• Resource-limit escapes — allocations not charged to the tracker (an unbounded or

amplifying String build without StringBuilder), unbounded loops, recursion without a depth guard.

• Performance — regressions the branch introduces, and improvements you spot.
• Verbose comments — docstrings and comments should be concise as per CLAUDE.md.
• Cleanups — duplication, misplaced logic, functions grown too complex.
• ./limitations/ — a new divergence with no entry is a finding.
• Docs parity — a user-visible change reflected in only one of README.md, docs/,

limitations/ and the crate READMEs is a finding. CLAUDE.md "Documentation surfaces that must stay in sync" has the obligation table. For a full pass, delegate to the docs-parity-reviewer subagent.

Report

Concise, most severe first. Per finding: file:line, what's wrong, the concrete failure it causes. Don't pad with what the branch got right.

Report only, unless the user asks for fixes.