npx skills add smithery/proffesor-for-testing --skill qe-iterative-loop
proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
qe-iterative-loop
Runs autonomous red-green-refactor loops to fix failing tests, reach coverage targets, and satisfy quality gates. Use when tests need to pass, coverage thresholds must be met, quality gates require compliance, or flaky tests need stabilization.
Installation
npx skills add proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill qe-iterative-loop
Similar popular skills
Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.
Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, includ…
810.4K installsPostgres best practices maintained by Supabase, for Postgres running anywhere. Load this skill …
391.6K installsReview UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "chec…
617.3K installsBuild, deploy, evaluate, optimize, fine-tune, and manage Microsoft Foundry agents, models, and …
576.5K installsDebug Azure production issues on Azure using AppLens, Azure Monitor, resource health, and safe …
568.9K installsAlso in this package
Other skills from proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe · top by installs.
npx skills add proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
More details
Agent compatibility
Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.
Also listed on
Alternate registries and mirrors of this skill.
Repository health
main
Skill metadata
Parsed from SKILL.md frontmatter.
Package contents
Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.
-
skill md
SKILL.md12,828 B -
docs
SUMMARY.md269 B
History
- First seen on skills.sh
- First recorded snapshot · 113 installs
SKILL.md
QE Iterative Loop
Overview
QE Iterative Loop is a specialized adaptation of the Ralph Wiggum technique for Quality Engineering workflows. It enables autonomous, self-correcting quality cycles where AI agents iterate until quality objectives are achieved - tests pass, coverage targets met, quality gates satisfied, or flaky tests stabilized.
Why QE Benefits from Iteration
Quality Engineering has objective, measurable success criteria:
- Tests either pass or fail (exit code 0 vs non-zero)
- Coverage is quantifiable (78.5% vs 80% target)
- Quality gates have binary outcomes (pass/fail)
- Contract validation has clear schemas
This makes QE ideal for iterative loops - we know exactly when we're done.
Prerequisites
- AQE v3 fleet initialized
- Test framework configured (Jest, Vitest, Pytest, etc.)
- Coverage tooling (c8, istanbul, coverage.py)
- Quality gate definitions
Quick Start
Pattern 1: Test Fix Iteration
# Task: Fix all failing tests
/qe-loop "Run npm test and fix all failing tests.
Success: npm test exits with code 0
Output <promise>TESTS_GREEN</promise> when all tests pass."
Pattern 2: Coverage Target Iteration
# Task: Achieve 80% coverage
/qe-loop "Increase test coverage to 80%.
Success: Coverage report shows >= 80%
Output <promise>COVERAGE_MET</promise> when target achieved."
Pattern 3: Quality Gate Iteration
# Task: Pass all quality gates
/qe-loop "Pass all quality gates for deployment.
Gates:
- Unit tests: pass
- Integration tests: pass
- Coverage: >= 80%
- No critical vulnerabilities
- Performance < 200ms P95
Output <promise>QUALITY_GATES_PASSED</promise> when all pass."
QE Iteration Patterns
Pattern 1: Test-Fix Iteration Loop
Goal: All tests pass
## QE Test-Fix Loop
### Success Criteria
- `npm test` (or test command) returns exit code 0
- No skipped tests (unless explicitly allowed)
- No pending tests
### Iteration Steps
1. Run full test suite
2. Parse output for failures
3. Analyze first failure:
- Identify failing test file
- Understand assertion that failed
- Check if production code or test is wrong
4. Fix the issue
5. Re-run failed test file only (faster feedback)
6. If file passes, run full suite
7. If all pass -> output <promise>TESTS_GREEN</promise>
8. If failures remain -> continue to next failure
### Safety
- Max iterations: 30
- After 10 iterations: report remaining failures
- Stop if same test fails 5 times (possible design issue)
Pattern 2: Coverage Improvement Loop
Goal: Achieve coverage target
## QE Coverage Loop
### Success Criteria
- Line coverage >= {target}%
- Branch coverage >= {target - 5}% (typically lower target)
- No critical paths uncovered
### Iteration Steps
1. Run tests with coverage: `npm test -- --coverage`
2. Parse coverage report
3. If target met -> output <promise>COVERAGE_MET</promise>
4. Identify uncovered files, sorted by:
- Critical business logic (highest priority)
- Lines uncovered (most impact)
- Complexity (McCabe score)
5. Generate test for highest-impact uncovered code
6. Run tests to verify new test passes
7. Check coverage improvement
8. Continue until target met
### Intelligence Integration
- Store successful test patterns in memory
- Learn from coverage achievements
- Predict best coverage strategies
### Commands
Check coverage status (via AQE MCP)
aqe memory get --key "coverage-status" --namespace "coverage"
Store coverage achievement pattern (via AQE MCP)
aqe memory store \ --key "coverage-pattern-auth" \ --value '{"approach": "mock external deps", "improvement": "12%"}' \ --namespace "coverage-patterns"
Pattern 3: Quality Gate Compliance Loop
Goal: Pass all quality gates
## QE Quality Gate Loop
### Gate Definitions
| Gate | Criteria | Priority |
|------|----------|----------|
| unit-tests | All pass | P0 |
| integration-tests | All pass | P0 |
| coverage | >= 80% | P1 |
| lint | No errors | P1 |
| typecheck | No errors | P1 |
| security | No critical/high CVEs | P0 |
| performance | P95 < 200ms | P2 |
### Iteration Strategy
1. Run all gate checks
2. Identify failing gates (sorted by priority)
3. Fix highest-priority failing gate
4. Re-run that gate to verify
5. When gate passes, move to next failing gate
6. When all pass -> output <promise>QUALITY_GATES_PASSED</promise>
### Gate Check Commands
Check all gates
npm test && npm run lint && npm run typecheck && npm run coverage && npm audit
Individual gate checks
npm test # unit-tests npm run test:integration # integration-tests npm run coverage # coverage npm run lint # lint npx tsc --noEmit # typecheck npm audit --audit-level=high # security npm run benchmark # performance
### Integration with AQE v3
Submit quality gate assessment task
aqe quality --runGate true
Task orchestration for gate compliance
aqe task submit --task "Pass all quality gates" --strategy adaptive
Pattern 4: Flaky Test Stabilization Loop
Goal: Eliminate test flakiness
## QE Flaky Test Loop
### Flakiness Detection
1. Run test suite N times (e.g., 5 runs)
2. Identify tests that pass/fail inconsistently
3. Calculate flakiness score: (inconsistent runs / total runs)
### Iteration Steps
1. Run: `for i in {1..5}; do npm test; done`
2. Aggregate results per test
3. Identify flaky tests (passed some, failed some)
4. For each flaky test:
- Analyze failure modes
- Common causes:
- Timing issues (add retries/waits)
- Shared state (isolate test data)
- Network calls (mock external services)
- Random data (use deterministic seeds)
- Apply appropriate fix
- Re-run 5 times to verify stability
5. When all tests stable -> output <promise>TESTS_STABLE</promise>
### AQE v3 Flaky Detection
Use qe-flaky-hunter agent
Task("Hunt flaky tests", "Detect and stabilize flaky tests", "qe-flaky-hunter")
Or submit flaky detection task
aqe task submit --type "flaky-detection" --priority "p1"
Pattern 5: Contract Validation Loop
Goal: API contracts aligned
## QE Contract Loop
### Success Criteria
- Provider implements all consumer contracts
- No breaking changes detected
- Schema validation passes
### Iteration Steps
1. Run contract tests: `npm run test:contracts`
2. Parse contract violations
3. For each violation:
- Determine if provider or consumer needs update
- Update appropriate side
- Re-run contract tests
4. When all contracts valid -> output <promise>CONTRACTS_VALID</promise>
### AQE v3 Integration
Validate contracts
aqe test contract --contractPath "./contracts"
Or use specialized agent
Task("Validate API contracts", "Check consumer-provider alignment", "qe-contract-validator")
AQE v3 Fleet Integration
Spawning QE Iteration Agents
# Initialize AQE fleet for QE iteration
aqe fleet init --topology "hierarchical" --maxAgents 8
# Spawn specialized QE iterators using Task tool
Task("Fix failing tests", "Iterate until all tests pass", "qe-tdd-green", {run_in_background: true})
Task("Improve coverage", "Iterate until 80% coverage", "qe-coverage-analyzer", {run_in_background: true})
Task("Fix security issues", "Iterate until security scan passes", "qe-security-scanner", {run_in_background: true})
Task("Stabilize flaky tests", "Iterate until tests stable", "qe-flaky-hunter", {run_in_background: true})
Memory-Enhanced QE Iteration
# Store iteration patterns for learning (via AQE MCP)
aqe memory store \
--key "qe-iteration-test-fix" \
--value '{"approach": "mock external deps", "success_rate": 0.85}' \
--namespace "qe-patterns"
# Search for relevant QE patterns (via AQE MCP)
aqe memory search \
--pattern "test-fix-*" \
--namespace "qe-patterns"
# Record successful iteration completion (via AQE task tracking)
aqe task status --taskId "test-fix-iteration"
QE-Specific Agent Routing
| QE Task | Recommended Agent | Iteration Goal |
|---|---|---|
| Test fixes | qe-tdd-green |
All tests pass |
| Coverage gaps | qe-coverage-analyzer |
Target coverage met |
| Quality gates | qe-quality-gate |
All gates pass |
| Flaky tests | qe-flaky-hunter |
Tests stable |
| Contract validation | qe-contract-validator |
Contracts aligned |
| Security fixes | qe-security-scanner |
No vulnerabilities |
| Performance | qe-performance-validator |
Benchmarks pass |
Completion Promises for QE
Standard QE Promises
# Test-related
<promise>TESTS_GREEN</promise> # All tests pass
<promise>TESTS_STABLE</promise> # Flaky tests fixed
<promise>TDD_COMPLETE</promise> # TDD cycle done
# Coverage-related
<promise>COVERAGE_MET</promise> # Target coverage achieved
<promise>GAPS_FILLED</promise> # Coverage gaps addressed
# Quality gates
<promise>QUALITY_GATES_PASSED</promise> # All gates pass
<promise>DEPLOYMENT_READY</promise> # Ready for deploy
# Contract/API
<promise>CONTRACTS_VALID</promise> # Contracts aligned
<promise>API_COMPLIANT</promise> # API matches spec
# Security
<promise>SECURITY_CLEARED</promise> # No vulnerabilities
<promise>COMPLIANCE_MET</promise> # Compliance requirements met
# Performance
<promise>PERF_TARGET_MET</promise> # Benchmarks satisfied
Example: Full QE Iteration Workflow
## Complete QE Iteration Task
### Objective
Achieve deployment readiness through iterative quality improvement
### Phase 1: Test Health (Priority)
1. Run `npm test`
2. Fix failing tests iteratively
3. Success: <promise>TESTS_GREEN</promise>
### Phase 2: Coverage (After Phase 1)
1. Run `npm test -- --coverage`
2. Write tests for uncovered critical paths
3. Success: Coverage >= 80% -> <promise>COVERAGE_MET</promise>
### Phase 3: Quality Gates (After Phase 2)
1. Run lint: `npm run lint`
2. Run typecheck: `npx tsc --noEmit`
3. Fix any violations
4. Success: <promise>LINT_PASS</promise> + <promise>TYPES_PASS</promise>
### Phase 4: Security (Parallel with Phase 3)
1. Run `npm audit`
2. Fix critical/high vulnerabilities
3. Success: <promise>SECURITY_CLEARED</promise>
### Phase 5: Integration
1. Run `npm run test:integration`
2. Fix any integration failures
3. Success: <promise>INTEGRATION_PASS</promise>
### Final Gate
When ALL phases complete -> <promise>DEPLOYMENT_READY</promise>
### Safety Limits
- Max iterations per phase: 15
- Total max iterations: 50
- Stuck detection: 5 iterations without progress triggers escalation
Troubleshooting
Issue: Tests Keep Failing Same Assertion
Cause: Likely a design issue, not implementation bug
Solution:
- Stop iteration after 5 attempts on same test
- Analyze if test expectation is correct
- Review if production behavior is as designed
- Escalate to human review if unclear
Issue: Coverage Plateau
Cause: Remaining uncovered code is complex/conditional
Solution:
- Identify uncovered branches (not just lines)
- Generate edge case tests
- Consider if uncovered code is dead code
- Accept lower target for genuinely untestable code
Issue: Flaky Tests Won't Stabilize
Cause: Deep timing or state issues
Solution:
- Add explicit waits/retries
- Mock time-dependent behavior
- Isolate test environment
- Consider marking as skip with explanation
Related Skills
- [iterative-loop](../iterative-loop/) - General iteration technique
- [qe-test-generation](../qe-test-generation/) - AI-powered test creation
- [qe-coverage-analysis](../qe-coverage-analysis/) - Coverage gap detection
- [qe-quality-assessment](../qe-quality-assessment/) - Quality gate management
- [qe-chaos-resilience](../qe-chaos-resilience/) - Resilience iteration testing
Resources
- [AQE v3 Documentation](../../v3/README.md) - Full v3 reference
- Ralph Wiggum Technique - Original methodology
- Agentic QE MCP Tools - MCP tool reference
Origin: Adapted from Ralph Wiggum plugin (anthropics/claude-code) Specialized for: Agentic QE v3 Fleet with 60 QE agents Domains: test-generation, test-execution, coverage-analysis, quality-assessment