npx skills add smithery/neversight --skill hiring-recruitment
pluginagentmarketplace/custom-plugin-engineering-manager
hiring-recruitment
Master hiring processes, interviewing, candidate assessment, and building strong engineering teams
Installation
npx skills add pluginagentmarketplace/custom-plugin-engineering-manager --skill hiring-recruitment
Similar popular skills
Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.
Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, includ…
810.4K installsReview UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "chec…
617.3K installsBuild, deploy, evaluate, optimize, fine-tune, and manage Microsoft Foundry agents, models, and …
576.5K installsArchitect and provision enterprise Azure infrastructure from workload descriptions. For cloud a…
402.8K installsAlso in this package
Other skills from pluginagentmarketplace/custom-plugin-engineering-manager.
npx skills add pluginagentmarketplace/custom-plugin-engineering-manager
Browse all from pluginagentmarketplace/custom-plugin-engineering-manager
More details
Agent compatibility
Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.
Also listed on
Alternate registries and mirrors of this skill.
Repository health
main
Skill metadata
Parsed from SKILL.md frontmatter.
Package contents
Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.
-
skill md
SKILL.md9,412 B -
docs
SUMMARY.md124 B
History
- First seen on skills.sh
- First recorded snapshot · 159 installs
SKILL.md
Hiring & Recruitment Skill
Purpose
Provide engineering managers with comprehensive hiring frameworks, interview templates, and assessment tools for building strong engineering teams.
Primary Bond
Agent: hiring-performance-agent Relationship: This skill provides the hiring templates, scorecards, and evaluation frameworks that the agent uses.
Templates
Job Description Template
# {Role Title} - {Team}
## About the Role
{2-3 sentences on impact and scope - what will they accomplish?}
## What You'll Do
- {Responsibility 1 - outcome focused, not task focused}
- {Responsibility 2 - include collaboration aspects}
- {Responsibility 3 - include growth opportunities}
- {Responsibility 4 - include impact on users/business}
## What We're Looking For
### Must Have
- {Years of experience or equivalent demonstrated ability}
- {Core technical skill 1}
- {Core technical skill 2}
- {Key soft skill}
### Nice to Have
- {Bonus technical skill}
- {Domain experience}
- {Leadership experience}
## Our Interview Process
1. **Recruiter Screen** (30 min) - Background and mutual fit
2. **Technical Screen** (60 min) - Coding and problem-solving
3. **System Design** (60 min) - Architecture thinking
4. **Team Fit** (45 min) - Collaboration and values
5. **Hiring Manager** (45 min) - Final discussion
Expected timeline: 2-3 weeks
## What We Offer
- {Compensation range if public}
- {Key benefits}
- {Growth opportunities}
- {Culture highlights}
Interview Scorecard
interview_scorecard:
candidate: "{Name}"
role: "{Role}"
interviewer: "{Name}"
date: "{Date}"
interview_type: "{Technical | Design | Behavioral | Final}"
competencies:
technical_skills:
weight: 30%
score: null # 1-5
evidence: ""
strong_signals: []
concerns: []
problem_solving:
weight: 25%
score: null
evidence: ""
strong_signals: []
concerns: []
communication:
weight: 15%
score: null
evidence: ""
strong_signals: []
concerns: []
collaboration:
weight: 15%
score: null
evidence: ""
strong_signals: []
concerns: []
growth_mindset:
weight: 15%
score: null
evidence: ""
strong_signals: []
concerns: []
overall:
weighted_score: null
recommendation: null # Strong Hire | Hire | No Hire | Strong No Hire
summary: ""
next_steps: ""
scoring_guide:
5: "Exceptional - top 5% of candidates seen"
4: "Strong - clearly above bar"
3: "Meets bar - solid hire"
2: "Below bar - significant concerns"
1: "Far below bar - clear no hire"
Behavioral Interview Guide (STAR)
star_framework:
situation:
prompt: "Tell me about a time when..."
look_for:
- "Specific, real example"
- "Clear context setting"
- "Relevant to competency"
task:
prompt: "What was your specific responsibility?"
look_for:
- "Personal ownership"
- "Clear scope understanding"
- "Appropriate level of challenge"
action:
prompt: "What steps did you take?"
look_for:
- "Specific actions (not 'we' but 'I')"
- "Logical approach"
- "Problem-solving demonstrated"
result:
prompt: "What was the outcome? What did you learn?"
look_for:
- "Measurable impact"
- "Self-reflection"
- "Learning demonstrated"
sample_questions:
problem_solving:
- "Tell me about a time you solved a problem with incomplete information"
- "Describe a situation where you had to make a difficult trade-off"
- "Tell me about a technical decision you later regretted"
collaboration:
- "Tell me about a time you had a conflict with a teammate"
- "Describe a situation where you had to influence without authority"
- "Tell me about receiving critical feedback"
leadership:
- "Tell me about a time you mentored someone"
- "Describe a situation where you drove a significant change"
- "Tell me about a time you had to make an unpopular decision"
Hiring Pipeline Metrics
hiring_metrics:
funnel_metrics:
applications_to_screen: "{X}%"
screen_to_interview: "{X}%"
interview_to_offer: "{X}%"
offer_to_accept: "{X}%"
time_metrics:
time_to_first_response: "{X} days"
time_to_offer: "{X} days"
time_to_hire: "{X} days"
quality_metrics:
new_hire_90_day_retention: "{X}%"
new_hire_performance_rating: "{X}/5"
hiring_manager_satisfaction: "{X}/5"
targets:
time_to_hire: "<45 days"
offer_acceptance: ">80%"
90_day_retention: ">95%"
diversity_pipeline: ">40%"
red_flags:
time_to_hire: ">60 days"
offer_acceptance: "<60%"
90_day_retention: "<85%"
Decision Trees
Hire / No-Hire Decision
Scorecard Complete
|
+-- Any Strong No Hire?
| +-- Yes -> No Hire (single strong no is veto)
| +-- No -> Continue
|
+-- Weighted score >= 3.0?
| +-- No -> No Hire
| +-- Yes -> Continue
|
+-- Any critical competency < 3?
| +-- Yes -> Discuss in debrief, likely No Hire
| +-- No -> Continue
|
+-- All interviewers Hire or Strong Hire?
| +-- Yes -> Make offer
| +-- No -> Debrief discussion, address concerns
Offer Negotiation
Candidate requests higher comp
|
+-- Within approved range?
| +-- Yes -> Can approve, consider value
| +-- No -> Continue
|
+-- Top candidate for role?
| +-- Yes -> Escalate for exception
| +-- No -> Continue
|
+-- Can we offer other value?
| +-- Yes -> Negotiate (signing bonus, equity, title, start date)
| +-- No -> Explain our position, give time to decide
Anti-Patterns
anti_patterns:
culture_fit_trap:
symptom: "Hiring people just like us"
remedy:
- "Define 'culture add' not 'culture fit'"
- "Diverse interview panels"
- "Structured evaluation criteria"
halo_effect:
symptom: "One great answer overshadows all else"
remedy:
- "Structured scorecards for each competency"
- "Multiple interviewers for same competency"
- "Calibration before debrief"
urgency_hire:
symptom: "We need someone NOW"
remedy:
- "Bad hire costs more than waiting"
- "Consider contractors for immediate needs"
- "Never lower the bar"
confirmation_bias:
symptom: "Looking for evidence to confirm first impression"
remedy:
- "Document evidence before scoring"
- "Score independently before debrief"
- "Assign devil's advocate in debrief"
Quick Reference Cards
Interview Debrief Structure
1. Scores submitted independently (before meeting)
2. Go around - each interviewer shares (2 min each)
- Overall recommendation
- Key evidence (specific examples)
- Top concern
3. Discussion of disagreements
4. Hiring manager makes final call
5. Document decision and reasoning
Red Flags to Watch
red_flags:
technical:
- "Cannot explain their own code"
- "No questions about the codebase"
- "Blames others for past failures"
behavioral:
- "Uses 'we' exclusively (no personal ownership)"
- "No examples of learning from mistakes"
- "Dismissive of questions"
cultural:
- "Badmouths previous employers"
- "No interest in team dynamics"
- "Unwilling to receive feedback"
Candidate Experience Checklist
candidate_experience:
before:
- "Clear job description"
- "Fast initial response (<48h)"
- "Interview prep materials sent"
during:
- "Interviewers prepared and on time"
- "Candidate can ask questions"
- "Respectful, welcoming atmosphere"
after:
- "Timeline communicated"
- "Feedback provided (if rejected)"
- "Offer delivered promptly"
Troubleshooting
| Problem | Root Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Not enough candidates | Poor JD, wrong channels | Revise JD, expand sourcing |
| High drop-off after screen | Process too slow, poor experience | Speed up, improve communication |
| Offers declined | Comp, culture, opportunity | Exit survey, adjust offer |
| Bad hires | Weak interview process | Structured interviews, calibration |
Validation Rules
input_validation:
role_level:
type: enum
values: [junior, mid, senior, staff, principal, manager, director]
required: true
urgency:
type: enum
values: [low, medium, high, critical]
default: medium
team_context:
type: object
properties:
size: { type: integer }
current_gaps: { type: array }
required: false
Resources
Books:
- Who: The A Method for Hiring - Geoff Smart
- The Effective Hiring Manager - Mark Horstman
- Work Rules! - Laszlo Bock
Tools:
- Structured interview training
- Unconscious bias training
- Calibration session templates