paulrberg/agent-skills

tool-finder

Use to find, compare, and recommend current tools, packages, libraries, CLIs, VSCode extensions, agent skills, databases, or infrastructure options for a development task.

First seen Aug 4, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add paulrberg/agent-skills --skill tool-finder

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from paulrberg/agent-skills · top by installs.

npx skills add paulrberg/agent-skills

Browse all from paulrberg/agent-skills

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Repository health

Stars 70
License LICENSE.md
Default branch main
Open issues 4
Status Active

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 2,767 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 190 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 16 installs

SKILL.md

Tool Finder

This skill is coordination-exempt: skip the ai-coord gate for its declared work.

Recommend the current option that best fits the user's actual constraints, backed by fresh primary evidence.

Workflow

  1. Infer the ecosystem, existing stack, must-haves, switching cost, and decision criteria from the request and

repository. Ask only when an unknown would materially change the recommendation.

  1. Check whether the standard library, platform, or an already-installed tool is sufficient before adding a dependency.
  2. Search current authoritative sources. Read [references/tool-finder.md](references/tool-finder.md) only for the

relevant ecosystem's source routing, fallback criteria, install conventions, and red flags.

  1. Compare the viable options against the user's criteria. Use adoption, maintenance, security, documentation,

performance, operational cost, and ecosystem fit only where they affect this decision; do not force fixed weights or a fixed number of candidates.

  1. Recommend one option when the evidence supports it. State the decisive tradeoff, material red flags, and the closest

alternative. Say when the evidence is too close or no external tool is justified.

Defaults

  • With no repository evidence, default to JavaScript/TypeScript and Node.js tooling.
  • For JavaScript installs, prefer the repository's package manager and otherwise ni; for macOS CLIs, prefer an

official or well-maintained Homebrew formula.

  • Prefer registries, official docs, repositories, changelogs, and security advisories over secondary comparisons. For

agent skills, search registries and GitHub because no single index is complete.

Completion

The answer is complete when the recommendation is traceable to current sources, the deciding criteria are explicit, installation guidance matches the user's environment, and uncertainties or disqualifying risks are visible. Use a table only when repeated fields make the comparison easier to scan.

Lead with ### 🏆 Pick: <tool> and the decisive reason. Follow with ### 📦 Install and the exact command, a compact criteria/evidence table only when fields repeat, ### 🥈 Closest alternative only for a credible material runner-up, and ### ⚠️ Caveats only when material. Use symbols in comparison cells only with text; never manufacture scores. Keep URL targets exact and use descriptive Markdown links for human output. Keep install commands, versions, security advisories, and installer-risk wording exact and undecorated.