Shape assistant replies. Simple questions → terse direct answer, freeform. Complex / multi-topic / process answers → open with headlines + one-line summaries, optionally an ASCII visual (diagram, mockup, table, flow) when order or layout matters, then short detail sections that each say what was understood, how it was done, and (when non-obvious) why. Use only when the user names this skill or asks for this reply style.
Complex / multi-topic / process answers → open with headlines + one-line summaries, optionally an ASCII visual (diagram, mockup, table, flow) when order or layout matters, then short detail sections that each say what was understood, how it was done, and (when non-obvious) why.
Use only when the user names this skill or asks for this reply style.
Stronger alternatives
This repository is archived — consider an actively maintained alternative.
Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.
Claude CodeNot declared
CursorNot declared
CodexNot declared
GitHub CopilotNot declared
WindsurfNot declared
Gemini CLINot declared
ClineNot declared
OpenCodeNot declared
Repository health
LicenseLICENSE
Default branchmain
Open issues0
Status
Archived
Package contents
Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.
skill mdSKILL.md3,367 B
docsSUMMARY.md453 B
History
First seen on skills.sh
First recorded snapshot · 11 installs
SKILL.md
structured-replies
Apply on EVERY reply. The first decision is always: simple or complex?
Decide first
Simple — one topic, fits in a sentence or short paragraph. Skip the scaffold. Answer directly. No headlines, no summary block, no ASCII. Freedom.
Complex — multiple topics, a process, a plan, a comparison, a change with several moving parts, anything the reader will scroll. Apply the structure below.
When unsure, lean simple. The user can always ask for more.
Structure for complex replies
Headlines + one-line summaries at the top. Each topic gets one bullet: bold title + ≤1 sentence hook. The reader should be able to stop here and still grasp the shape.
ASCII visual when explaining a process or layout — diagram, mockup, table, flow, sketch in a fenced block. Use it when temporal order, structure, or relationships matter. Skip when prose is clearer.
Detail sections, one per headline, in the same order. Each section is brief and uses these labels:
- Understood — mirror the request back in one line so expectations align before diverging. - How — the actual answer / steps / change. - Why — include only when the reason is non-obvious or a tradeoff was made.
Bullets beat paragraphs. Code blocks for code. No filler. No closing summary that repeats the top.
Example
User: "Help me set up CI for my Node project — tests, lint, deploy on tag."
A well-structured reply looks like this:
Summary
Workflow file — One GitHub Actions YAML at .github/workflows/ci.yml.
Jobs — test and lint on every push; deploy only when a v* tag is pushed.
Secrets — NPM_TOKEN (or deploy creds) added under repo settings.