Installation

$ npx skills add openharmonyinsight/openharmony-skills --skill ai-generated-ut-code-review

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared

Cursor Not declared

Codex Not declared

GitHub Copilot Not declared

Windsurf Not declared

Gemini CLI Not declared

Cline Not declared

OpenCode Not declared

Repository health

Stars 33

Default branch main

Open issues 2

Status Active

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

skill md SKILL.md 3,464 B

docs SUMMARY.md 244 B

History

Feb 7, 2026 First seen on skills.sh

Sep 9, 2026 First recorded snapshot · 77 installs

SKILL.md

AI UT Code Review

Overview

Review AI-generated unit tests for effectiveness, coverage, assertions, negative cases, determinism, and maintainability. Output a 0-10 score, a risk level, and a must-fix checklist. Overall line coverage must be >= 80%; otherwise risk is at least High.

When to Use

AI-generated UT/test code review or quality evaluation
Need scoring, risk level, or must-fix checklist
Questions about coverage or assertion validity

Workflow

Confirm tests target the intended business code and key paths.
Check overall line coverage (>= 80% required).
Inspect assertions for behavioral validity; flag missing/ineffective assertions.
Verify negative/edge cases and determinism (no env/time dependency).
Score by rubric, assign risk, list must-fix items with evidence.

Scoring (0-10)

Each dimension 0-2 points. Sum = total score.

Dimension	0	1	2
Coverage	< 80%	80%+ but shallow	80%+ and meaningful
Assertion Quality	No/invalid assertions	Some weak assertions	Behavior-anchored assertions
Negative & Edge	Missing	Partial	Comprehensive
Data & Isolation	Flaky/env-dependent	Mixed	Deterministic, isolated
Maintainability	Hard to read/modify	Mixed quality	Clear structure & naming

Risk Levels

Blocker: Coverage < 80% AND key paths untested, or tests have no meaningful assertions
High: Coverage < 80% OR assertions largely ineffective
Medium: Coverage OK but weak edge cases or fragile design
Low: Minor improvements

Must-Fix Checklist

Overall line coverage >= 80%
Each test has at least one behavior-relevant assertion
Negative/exception cases exist for core logic
Tests are deterministic and repeatable

AI-Generated Test Pitfalls (Check Explicitly)

No assertions or assertions unrelated to behavior (e.g., only not-null)
Over-mocking hides real behavior
Only happy-path coverage
Tests depend on time/network/env
Missing verification of side effects

Output Format (Required, Semi-fixed)

Score: x/10 — Coverage x, Assertion Quality x, Negative & Edge x, Data & Isolation x, Maintainability x
Risk: Low/Medium/High/Blocker — 简述原因（1 行）
Must-fix:

- [动作 + 证据] - [动作 + 证据]

Key Evidence:

- 引用具体测试用例名或覆盖率报告摘要（1-2 条）

Notes:

- 最小修复建议或替代方案（1-2 行）

Rules:

覆盖率 < 80% 风险至少 High，并必须列入 Must-fix
无断言/无效断言直接提升风险级别，必须列入 Must-fix
至少 2 条证据；证据不足需说明并降分

Common Mistakes

仅报告覆盖率，不评价断言有效性
把日志输出当成断言
忽略失败路径/异常路径

Example (Concise)

Score: 5/10 (Coverage 1, Assertion 0, Negative 1, Data 2, Maintainability 1) Risk: High Must-fix:

Tests for parseConfig() contain no behavior assertions (only logs)
No negative cases for malformed input

Key Evidence:

parseConfig() tests only assert no crash
Coverage report shows 62% lines

Notes:

Add assertions on outputs and side effects; add invalid input tests.

ai-generated-ut-code-review