oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix

codex-ab

Run an A/B codex review experiment — holistic codex review vs 3 focused dimension passes (security, ecto, liveview) on the branch diff, classify findings, report a panel-value verdict. Use when the branch is fresh, before any codex review runs.

First seen Jul 21, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix --skill codex-ab

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix · top by installs.

npx skills add oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix

Browse all from oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Repository health

Stars 541
License LICENSE
Default branch main
Open issues 13
Status Active

Skill metadata

Parsed from SKILL.md frontmatter.

Declared agents claude-code codex

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 3,970 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 262 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 12 installs

SKILL.md

Codex Panel A/B (contributor instrument — verdict decided)

Answer one question with evidence: do dimension-focused codex passes find real issues that one holistic codex exec review misses? Runs both on the same diff, then classifies every focused finding against the holistic pass.

DECIDED 2026-07-10 after 4 runs (2 fresh): panel KILLED. Fresh-only
1 real miss / 1 false positive plus one zero-value run at 4× cost —
real misses did not outnumber FPs. Kept as contributor tooling (NOT
distributed) for one possible retest: a UI-heavy diff with a single
extra liveview-focused pass (2× cost). Scoreboard:
.claude/research/2026-07-03-codex-review-integration.md §7.

Usage

/codex-ab            # A/B against main (~5 min, 4 codex runs)
/codex-ab develop    # explicit base branch

Iron Laws

  1. FRESH DIFF ONLY — ask the user to confirm this branch has NOT been

codex-reviewed yet (cloud or /phx:codex-loop). A drained diff returns NO FINDINGS everywhere and proves nothing — wasted quota

  1. Verify every REAL MISS in the code before counting it — a focused

finding only scores if the issue actually exists at that file:line

  1. Read ONLY the findings .md files — streams are diverted to .log

files; never cat a log into context (10k+ lines each)

  1. Exactly 4 codex runs, never re-run dimensions — bounded quota
  2. Persist the verdict — an unrecorded experiment is wasted quota

Workflow

Step 1: Preflight

Run command -v codex — missing → STOP with install hint. Then:

  • git status --short dirty → warn (codex flags local dirt as findings)
  • Ask: "Has codex already reviewed this branch (PR review or codex-loop)?"

If yes → STOP, explain the fresh-diff requirement (Iron Law 1)

Step 2: Run the A/B (background, ~5 min)

bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/codex-panel-ab.sh {base} \
  .claude/reviews/codex-ab-$(date +%Y-%m-%d-%H%M)

Use runinbackground — it runs 1 holistic codex exec review + 3 focused codex exec workers (security / ecto / liveview) in parallel, all streams redirected. Do other work or wait; never poll.

Step 3: Classify

Read the 4 findings files (holistic.md, security.md, ecto.md, liveview.md — small). For EACH focused finding:

Class Meaning Test
DUPLICATE Holistic already found it Same file + same defect
REAL MISS Genuine issue holistic missed Read the code at file:line — defect confirmed (Iron Law 2)
FALSE POSITIVE Manufactured, pre-existing, or wrong Code check fails, or issue exists on base branch too

Step 4: Verdict

Present:

## Codex Panel A/B — {branch} vs {base}
| dimension | findings | duplicate | real miss | false positive |
Holistic-only findings: {n}
Verdict this run: {REAL MISS count} real miss vs {FP count} false positive
Decision rule: build --codex-panel only if real misses outnumber false
positives across 2-3 fresh branches.

Write the verdict table to .claude/reviews/codex-ab-{date}/VERDICT.md. Suggest repeating on the next 1–2 fresh branches before deciding.

Integration

fresh branch → /codex-ab (YOU ARE HERE) → verdict logged
   ├─ real misses win across runs → build /phx:review --codex-panel
   └─ duplicates/FPs win → keep holistic /phx:codex-loop, drop panel idea
       └─ OUTCOME 2026-07-10: this branch won — panel dropped

References

  • ${CLAUDESKILLDIR}/scripts/codex-panel-ab.sh — the 4-run harness
  • Related: /phx:codex-loop (holistic fix loop), /phx:review --codex