npx skills add smithery/neversight --skill code-style-validator
oimiragieo/agent-studio
code-style-validator
Programmatic code style validation using AST analysis. Complements (not replaces) code-style rules by providing automated checking and instant feedback.
Installation
npx skills add oimiragieo/agent-studio --skill code-style-validator
Similar popular skills
Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.
Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "fi…
3.3M installsBrowser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, includ…
810.4K installsReview UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "chec…
617.3K installsBuild, deploy, evaluate, optimize, fine-tune, and manage Microsoft Foundry agents, models, and …
576.5K installsPrepare azd-based Azure projects for deployment: generates azure.yaml, infrastructure (Bicep/Te…
568.3K installsAlso in this package
Other skills from oimiragieo/agent-studio · top by installs.
npx skills add oimiragieo/agent-studio
More details
Agent compatibility
Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.
Also listed on
Alternate registries and mirrors of this skill.
Repository health
main
Skill metadata
Parsed from SKILL.md frontmatter.
Package contents
Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.
-
skill md
SKILL.md9,672 B -
docs
SUMMARY.md180 B
History
- First seen on skills.sh
- First recorded snapshot · 82 installs
SKILL.md
Installation
No separate download: the skill runs the in-repo tool .claude/tools/cli/security-lint.cjs.
- Ensure Node.js (v18+) is installed: nodejs.org or
winget install OpenJS.NodeJS.LTS(Windows),brew install node(macOS). - From the project root, the script is invoked automatically; no extra install steps.
Cheat Sheet & Best Practices
AST-based validation: Use ESLint (or equivalent) with selectors/patterns; rules listen for specific node types. Prefer existing community rules before writing custom ones; custom rules need meta (type, fixable, schema) and create.
Process: Check naming (camelCase/PascalCase/snake_case), indentation, import order, function/class structure, comment style. Run in pre-commit and CI; provide auto-fix where possible.
Hacks: Use --fix for auto-fixable rules; combine with security-lint for policy. Define rule metadata clearly for docs and tooling. Use AST selectors for precise pattern matching (node type, attributes, child/sibling).
Certifications & Training
ESLint: Use in project, custom rules, selectors. No cert; skill data: AST-based validation, pre-commit/CI, auto-fix, naming/indent/imports.
Hooks & Workflows
Suggested hooks: Pre-commit: run security-lint (skill script) or ESLint; block commit on failure. Use with developer (secondary), code-reviewer (secondary), qa (CI).
Workflows: Use with code-reviewer (secondary), developer (secondary). Flow: before commit or in CI → run validator → fix or block. See code-review-workflow.md, validation hooks.
<identity> Code Style Validator - Programmatically validates code style using AST (Abstract Syntax Tree) analysis. Complements code-style rules by providing automated checking. </identity>
<capabilities>
- Before committing code
- In pre-commit hooks
- During code review
- In CI/CD pipelines
- To enforce consistent code style
</capabilities>
<instructions> <execution_process>
Step 1: Identify Code Style Patterns
Analyze the codebase to identify style patterns:
- Naming conventions (camelCase, PascalCase, snake_case)
- Indentation style (spaces vs tabs, width)
- Import organization
- Function/class structure
- Comment style
Step 2: AST-Based Validation
Use language-specific AST parsers:
TypeScript/JavaScript: </execution_process> </instructions>
<examples> <code_example> TypeScript/JavaScript AST Validation:
const ts = require('typescript');
const fs = require('fs');
function validateTypeScriptFile(filePath) {
const sourceCode = fs.readFileSync(filePath, 'utf8');
const sourceFile = ts.createSourceFile(filePath, sourceCode, ts.ScriptTarget.Latest, true);
const issues = [];
// Validate naming conventions
ts.forEachChild(sourceFile, node => {
if (ts.isFunctionDeclaration(node) && node.name) {
if (!/^[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*$/.test(node.name.text)) {
issues.push({
line: sourceFile.getLineAndCharacterOfPosition(node.name.getStart()).line + 1,
message: `Function name "${node.name.text}" should be camelCase`,
});
}
}
});
return issues;
}
</code_example>
<code_example> Python AST Validation:
import ast
import re
def validate_python_file(file_path):
with open(file_path, 'r') as f:
source_code = f.read()
tree = ast.parse(source_code)
issues = []
for node in ast.walk(tree):
if isinstance(node, ast.FunctionDef):
if not re.match(r'^[a-z][a-z0-9_]*$', node.name):
issues.append({
'line': node.lineno,
'message': f'Function name "{node.name}" should be snake_case'
})
return issues
</code_example>
<code_example> Style Checks:
Naming Conventions:
- Variables: camelCase (JS/TS) or snake_case (Python)
- Functions: camelCase (JS/TS) or snake_case (Python)
- Classes: PascalCase
- Constants: UPPER_CASE
- Private: prefix with underscore
Formatting:
- Indentation: 2 spaces (JS/TS) or 4 spaces (Python)
- Line length: 88-100 characters
- Trailing commas: Yes (JS/TS)
- Semicolons: Consistent usage
Structure:
- Import order: external, internal, relative
- Function length: < 50 lines
- File organization: exports, helpers, types
</code_example>
<code_example> Usage Examples (Template - implement validator first):
Validate Single File:
# After implementing your validator:
node validate-code-style.js src/components/Button.tsx
Validate Directory:
# After implementing your validator:
node validate-code-style.js src/components/
Output Format:
{
"file": "src/components/Button.tsx",
"valid": false,
"issues": [
{
"line": 15,
"column": 10,
"rule": "naming-convention",
"message": "Variable 'UserData' should be camelCase: 'userData'",
"severity": "error"
},
{
"line": 23,
"column": 5,
"rule": "indentation",
"message": "Expected 2 spaces, found 4",
"severity": "warning"
}
],
"summary": {
"total": 2,
"errors": 1,
"warnings": 1
}
}
</code_example>
<code_example> Pre-commit Hook (Template - implement validator first):
#!/bin/bash
# .git/hooks/pre-commit
changed_files=$(git diff --cached --name-only --diff-filter=ACM | grep -E '\.(ts|tsx|js|jsx|py)$')
for file in $changed_files; do
# Replace with your actual validator path
if ! node validate-code-style.js "$file"; then
echo "Code style validation failed for $file"
exit 1
fi
done
</code_example>
<code_example> CI/CD Integration (Template - implement validator first):
# .github/workflows/code-style.yml
- name: Validate code style
run: |
# Replace with your actual validator path
node validate-code-style.js src/
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
echo "Code style validation failed"
exit 1
fi
</code_example> </examples>
<instructions> <best_practices>
- Complement, Don't Replace: This tool complements code-style rules, doesn't replace them
- Configurable Rules: Allow teams to customize validation rules
- Auto-fix When Possible: Provide auto-fix suggestions for common issues
- Fast Feedback: Provide instant feedback during development
- Clear Messages: Show clear error messages with line numbers and suggestions
</best_practices> </instructions>
Iron Laws
- ALWAYS use AST-based validation over regex — regex-based style checking breaks on multi-line constructs, comments, and strings; AST-based tools (ESLint, Prettier) are format-independent and semantically accurate.
- ALWAYS check for existing ESLint/Prettier rules before writing custom ones — custom rules are expensive to maintain; 95% of style needs are covered by existing rules with configuration.
- NEVER block commits for style warnings, only errors — warnings are informational; blocking CI on warnings creates friction that leads teams to disable style checks entirely.
- ALWAYS provide auto-fix suggestions alongside findings — reports without auto-fix require manual intervention for each issue; auto-fixable violations have near-100% resolution rates vs 30% for manual.
- ALWAYS run style validation in both pre-commit hooks and CI — pre-commit catches issues locally before they reach the repository; CI catches cases where hooks were bypassed or aren't installed.
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Regex-based style checking | Breaks on multi-line, strings, and comments | Use AST-based tools (ESLint, Prettier) |
| Custom rules for covered standards | High maintenance; inconsistent with community | Configure existing ESLint/Prettier rules first |
| Blocking CI on warnings | Excessive friction causes teams to disable style checks | Block only on errors; log warnings |
| Style validation without auto-fix | Manual fixes have low resolution rate | Always provide auto-fix commands alongside findings |
| Running only locally, not in CI | Developers bypass pre-commit hooks regularly | Run in both pre-commit and CI pipeline |
Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)
Before starting: Read .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
After completing:
- New pattern ->
.claude/context/memory/learnings.md - Issue found ->
.claude/context/memory/issues.md - Decision made ->
.claude/context/memory/decisions.md
ASSUME INTERRUPTION: If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.