nvidia/skills · Official

nemo-mbridge-perf-parallelism-strategies

Operational guide for choosing and combining parallelism strategies in Megatron Bridge, including sizing rules, hardware topology mapping, and combined parallelism configuration.

All-time #6697 First seen May 29, 2026
8-week activity · all time api

Installation

$ npx skills add nvidia/skills --skill nemo-mbridge-perf-parallelism-strategies

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from nvidia/skills · top by installs.

npx skills add nvidia/skills

Browse all from nvidia/skills

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Repository health

Stars 3.2K
License LICENSE-APACHE
Default branch main
Open issues 5
Status Active

Skill metadata

Parsed from SKILL.md frontmatter.

LicenseApache-2.0

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 9,580 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 226 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 1,800 installs

SKILL.md

Parallelism Strategy Selection Skill

For stable background on each parallelism type, see:

  • @docs/parallelisms.md
  • @skills/nemo-mbridge-perf-parallelism-strategies/card.yaml

Decision by Model Size

Dense models

Model size GPUs Recommended starting point
< 1B 1-8 DP only
1-10B 8-16 TP=2-4 + DP
10-70B 16-64 TP=4-8 + PP=2-4 + DP
70-175B 64-256 TP=8 + PP=4-8 + DP
175-500B 256-1024 TP=8 + PP=8-16 + CP=2 + DP

MoE models

MoE parallelism differs from dense models. Because only a fraction of parameters are active per token, TP can often stay at 1 or 2 — the active parameter shard already fits on a single GPU. EP is the primary scaling dimension, with PP handling cross-node layer distribution.

Model (total / active) TP PP EP Notes
OLMoE 7B / 1B 1 1 8 EP only, fits single node
Moonlight 16B / 3B 2 1 8 small TP for shared layers
DeepSeek-V2 236B / 21B 1 4 32 no TP at all
GLM-4.5 Air 106B / 12B 1 4 8 no TP at all
Qwen3 30B-A3B 4 2 4
GLM-4.5 355B / 32B 2 8 16
Qwen3 235B-A22B 4 16 8 CP=2 for pretrain
DeepSeek-V3 671B / 37B 2 16 64 TP=2, not 8
Kimi-K2 1T 2 16 32

Key patterns:

  • TP is sized by active params, not total params. A 671B MoE with

37B active needs far less TP than a 70B dense model.

  • EP scales with expert count. Common: EP = num_experts or

numexperts / expertsper_gpu.

  • PP handles depth. Large MoE models use PP=8-16 across nodes.
  • ETP (expert tensor parallelism) is rarely used. Llama 4 is an

exception (ETP=4).

These are starting points, not hard rules. Always profile the first iteration to verify memory and communication.

Decision by Hardware Topology

Single node with NVLink:

cfg.model.tensor_model_parallel_size = 8

Multiple nodes with InfiniBand:

cfg.model.tensor_model_parallel_size = 8
cfg.model.pipeline_model_parallel_size = N

Limited network (Ethernet):

cfg.model.tensor_model_parallel_size = 4
cfg.model.pipeline_model_parallel_size = M

The stable rule is: keep TP within a single NVLink domain. Use PP or DP for cross-node scaling. TP across nodes is almost always a performance loss.

Decision by Sequence Length

Sequence length Recommendation
< 2K standard TP + PP + DP
2K-8K add SP (sequence_parallel=True)
8K-32K add CP=2
32K+ add CP=4-8, consider a2a+p2p for large CP

Combined Parallelism Enablement

3D parallelism (TP + PP + DP):

cfg.model.tensor_model_parallel_size = 4
cfg.model.pipeline_model_parallel_size = 4
cfg.model.sequence_parallel = True

4D parallelism (TP + PP + CP + DP):

cfg.model.tensor_model_parallel_size = 8
cfg.model.pipeline_model_parallel_size = 8
cfg.model.context_parallel_size = 2
cfg.model.sequence_parallel = True

MoE with EP + PP (e.g. DeepSeek-V2 236B on 128 GPUs):

cfg.model.tensor_model_parallel_size = 1
cfg.model.pipeline_model_parallel_size = 4
cfg.model.expert_model_parallel_size = 32
cfg.model.sequence_parallel = False

MoE with small TP + PP + EP (e.g. DeepSeek-V3 671B on 256 GPUs):

cfg.model.tensor_model_parallel_size = 2
cfg.model.pipeline_model_parallel_size = 16
cfg.model.expert_model_parallel_size = 64
cfg.model.sequence_parallel = True

DP size is always implicit:

data_parallel_size = world_size / (TP * PP * CP)        # dense path
expert_data_parallel_size = world_size / (PP * EP * ETP) # MoE path

Minimum GPU Count

The minimum GPUs needed to run a config (i.e. with DP=1, EDP=1) is not the product of all parallelism dimensions. The dense path uses a TPCP-mesh and the MoE path uses an EPETP-mesh, and within each PP stage these two meshes share the same set of GPUs — they overlap, they don't multiply. Only PP stages multiply (they're disjoint slices of the model). So:

min_gpus = PP * max(TP * CP, EP * ETP)

Common simplification (WRONG): PP TP CP EP ETP. This over-allocates GPUs and shows up in many READMEs and slurm sizing tables. Don't propagate it.

The decoupling of attention and MoE parallelism (different mesh shapes for the dense and expert paths sharing the same PP-stage GPUs) is detailed in Pangu Ultra MoE (arXiv:2504.14960).

Examples

Config Wrong (PP·TP·CP·EP·ETP) Correct (PP·max(TP·CP, EP·ETP))
PP=1, TP=2, CP=1, EP=8, ETP=1 16 8 (1 node)
PP=1, TP=4, CP=1, EP=8, ETP=1 32 8 (max(4, 8))
PP=1, TP=2, CP=2, EP=8, ETP=1 32 8 (max(4, 8))
PP=1, TP=2, CP=4, EP=8, ETP=1 64 8 (max(8, 8))
PP=2, TP=2, CP=1, EP=8, ETP=1 32 16 (2 · max(2, 8))
PP=1, TP=2, CP=1, EP=4, ETP=2 16 8 (max(2, 8))

Scaling above the minimum

Adding GPUs scales DP and/or EDP (the worldsize must satisfy both equations simultaneously). At mingpus the larger-mesh side has DP (or EDP) = 1 and the smaller side absorbs the slack.

Example — TP=2, CP=1, EP=8, ETP=1, PP=1:

  • 8 GPUs (min_gpus): dense DP = 8/2 = 4, MoE EDP = 8/8 = 1
  • 16 GPUs: dense DP = 8, MoE EDP = 2 → 2× global batch
  • 32 GPUs: dense DP = 16, MoE EDP = 4 → 4× global batch

When sizing slurm scripts, compute --nodes from min_gpus (or a multiple of it for higher throughput via DP/EDP).

When answering MoE sizing prompts, include this checklist:

  • compute min_gpus = PP max(TP CP, EP * ETP) with the requested values
  • explicitly reject the wrong PP TP CP EP ETP full product
  • give both DP formulas: dense world_size / (TP PP CP) and MoE

world_size / (PP EP ETP)

  • mention TP topology, SP, CP divisibility, and long-sequence CP guidance

Memory Estimation

Without parallelism (70B model, FP16):

parameters:       140 GB
gradients:        140 GB
optimizer states: 280 GB (Adam)
activations:       48 GB (batch=1, seq=4K)
total:            608 GB

With TP=4, PP=4, DP=4 (64 GPUs):

parameters:        8.75 GB per GPU
gradients:         8.75 GB per GPU
optimizer states: 17.50 GB per GPU
activations:       3.00 GB per GPU
total:           ~38    GB per GPU

Code Anchors

Parallelism dimensions set in model provider:

```66:81:docs/parallelisms.md modelconfig = GPTModelProvider( tensormodelparallelsize=2, # ... other model parameters )


DP size calculation:

```424:436:docs/parallelisms.md
data_parallel_size = world_size / (tensor_model_parallel_size × pipeline_model_parallel_size × context_parallel_size)

Bridge initialization wires parallelism into process groups:

```618:628:src/megatron/bridge/training/initialize.py parallelstate.initializemodelparallel( tensormodelparallelsize=modelconfig.tensormodelparallelsize, pipelinemodelparallelsize=modelconfig.pipelinemodelparallelsize, ... contextparallelsize=modelconfig.contextparallelsize, hierarchicalcontextparallelsizes=modelconfig.hierarchicalcontextparallelsizes, expertmodelparallelsize=modelconfig.expertmodelparallelsize, ... )


## Pitfalls

1. TP across nodes destroys throughput. Always keep TP within a single
   NVLink domain.

2. PP without interleaving has large pipeline bubbles. Use
   `virtual_pipeline_model_parallel_size` when possible.

3. SP requires `tensor_model_parallel_size > 1`. Enabling SP alone
   without TP is a config error.

4. CP requires `seq_length % (2 * context_parallel_size) == 0`.

5. EP is only for MoE models. Setting `expert_model_parallel_size` on a
   dense model is a no-op or error.

6. The model-size-to-parallelism table above is a starting heuristic.
   Always profile the first iteration to check memory and communication.

7. `CUDA_DEVICE_MAX_CONNECTIONS` and related env vars interact with
   overlap settings. See @skills/nemo-mbridge-perf-tp-dp-comm-overlap/SKILL.md.

8. The minimum GPU count for an MoE config is `PP * max(TP*CP, EP*ETP)`,
   not the product of all dimensions. The dense `TP*CP`-mesh and MoE
   `EP*ETP`-mesh share the same GPUs in each PP stage. See
   "Minimum GPU Count" section above.

## Verification

Quick sanity check that combined parallelism initializes correctly using
the smallest available recipe with overridden parallelism:

CUDAVISIBLEDEVICES=0,1,2,3 uv run python -m torch.distributed.run --nprocpernode=4 \ scripts/training/runrecipe.py \ --recipe llama321bpretrainconfig \ model.tensormodelparallelsize=2 \ model.pipelinemodelparallelsize=2 \ model.sequenceparallel=True \ train.trainiters=3 train.globalbatchsize=8 train.microbatchsize=1 \ scheduler.lrwarmupiters=0 \ validation.evaliters=0 validation.evalinterval=0 \ checkpoint.saveinterval=0 \ logger.loginterval=1


Success criteria:

- exit code 0
- finite loss at iteration 3 (e.g. `lm loss: 1.003808E+01`)
- log shows TP=2 PP=2 DP=1 layout with 4 ranks