nvidia/skills · Official

nemo-mbridge-perf-memory-tuning

Techniques for reducing peak GPU memory in Megatron Bridge — expandable segments, PEFT + SP input re-gather, parallelism resizing, activation recompute, CPU offloading constraints, and common OOM fixes.

All-time #6581 First seen May 29, 2026
8-week activity · all time api

Installation

$ npx skills add nvidia/skills --skill nemo-mbridge-perf-memory-tuning

Also in this package

Other skills from nvidia/skills · top by installs.

npx skills add nvidia/skills

Browse all from nvidia/skills

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Repository health

Stars 3.2K
License LICENSE-APACHE
Default branch main
Open issues 5
Status Active

Skill metadata

Parsed from SKILL.md frontmatter.

LicenseApache-2.0

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 14,433 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 243 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 1,830 installs

SKILL.md

Memory Tuning

Stable docs: @docs/parallelisms.md Card: @skills/nemo-mbridge-perf-memory-tuning/card.yaml

What It Is

GPU OOM failures during training often stem from memory fragmentation rather than raw capacity. PyTorch's default CUDA allocator can leave unusable gaps between allocations. The single most effective fix is:

export PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF=expandable_segments:True

This tells PyTorch to use expandable (non-fixed-size) memory segments, which dramatically reduces fragmentation and often eliminates borderline OOM without any model or parallelism changes.

Beyond fragmentation, actual peak memory is determined by:

  • Parameter + optimizer state memory — controlled by TP, PP, DP sharding

(distributed optimizer, FSDP)

  • Activation memory — controlled by activation recompute, sequence length,

micro-batch size, and PEFT-specific retention of gathered inputs

  • Temporary / workspace memory — CUDA kernels, NCCL buffers, CUDA graphs

For configuration planning, use the Bridge theoretical estimator before launching large jobs:

from megatron.bridge.training.utils.theoretical_memory_utils import estimate_training_memory

estimate = estimate_training_memory(cfg, num_microbatches=num_microbatches)

The estimator reports the most-loaded GPU shard and separates dense/embedding, routed MoE expert, and activation components. It does not include allocator fragmentation, CUDA/NCCL workspace, CUDA graph buffers, token imbalance, or dispatcher workspace, so validate final configs with runtime memory metrics.

Quick Decision

When a training run OOMs or is close to the memory limit:

  1. Set PYTORCHCUDAALLOCCONF=expandablesegments:True first. This fixes

fragmentation-induced OOM with zero performance cost. Most Slurm launch templates already include it.

  1. For LoRA with sequence parallelism, enable input re-gather

(LoRA(sequenceparallelinput_regather=True)). This avoids retaining the full gathered LoRA-A input in every eligible layer; it has no effect when SP is disabled.

  1. Add selective activation recompute (recomputemodules=[coreattn]) if

not already enabled. See @skills/nemo-mbridge-perf-activation-recompute/SKILL.md.

  1. Avoid increasing TP as a memory fix — doubling TP dramatically increases

NVLink all-reduce volume and often kills throughput (-28% on Llama3 70B).

  1. Avoid increasing PP at the cost of DP — halving DP doubles gradient

accumulation steps and hurts throughput (~6%).

  1. Consider mlp recompute if still OOM. Saves ~3 GB but costs ~16% GPU

utilization on large dense models (Llama3 70B).

  1. CPU offloading is blocked when PP > 1.

Enablement

Expandable segments (recommended first step)

Set in the job's environment before launching:

export PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF=expandable_segments:True

In Slurm scripts this is typically placed alongside other env vars:

export CUDA_DEVICE_MAX_CONNECTIONS=1
export NVTE_ALLOW_NONDETERMINISTIC_ALGO=1
export PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF=expandable_segments:True

No model config changes needed. Zero throughput cost.

Parallelism resizing

If the model genuinely does not fit (not fragmentation), adjust parallelism:

Strategy Memory effect Throughput cost Notes
Increase PP (keeping DP) Fewer layers per stage Moderate (~6% if DP halved) Only if GPU count allows
Increase TP Fewer params per GPU Severe (-28% on 70B) Last resort
Distributed optimizer Shards optimizer state across DP ranks ~1-2% Recommended for large models
FSDP Shards params + grads + optimizer Varies See @skills/nemo-mbridge-perf-megatron-fsdp/SKILL.md

Activation recompute

See @skills/nemo-mbridge-perf-activation-recompute/SKILL.md for full details.

PEFT + sequence-parallel input re-gather

For LoRA training with sequence parallelism, eligible column-parallel linearqkv and linearfc1 adapters consume a gathered LayerNorm output. Because LoRA-A is trainable, the default path retains that full gathered input until backward for the LoRA-A weight gradient.

Enable input re-gather when constructing the PEFT config:

from megatron.bridge.peft.lora import LoRA

cfg.peft = LoRA(
    # Keep the recipe's existing LoRA settings here.
    sequence_parallel_input_regather=True,
)

With this option, forward still materializes the full input temporarily for the LoRA-A GEMM, but MCore autograd retains only its sequence-local shard. Backward asynchronously gathers the full input again, overlaps the collective with dgrad when possible, computes the LoRA-A weight gradient, and then reuses the temporary communication buffer.

This is a memory-for-communication tradeoff, not conventional activation checkpointing: no LayerNorm, attention, MLP, or LoRA GEMM is rerun. Some throughput degradation is expected, and the benefit grows with the amount of eligible LoRA-A activation retained. The option has no effect when sequence parallelism is disabled.

CPU offloading

cfg.model.cpu_offloading = True

Incompatible with PP > 1. Only usable when pipelinemodelparallel_size = 1.

A Note on VPP

Virtual pipeline parallelism (VPP) is primarily a throughput optimization that reduces pipeline bubble overhead by interleaving smaller model chunks. Its effect on peak memory is minimal — changing VPP does not meaningfully change the total activation, parameter, or optimizer memory on a GPU.

In earlier experiments we incorrectly attributed an OOM fix to VPP tuning (VPP 5→10). The actual fix was PYTORCHCUDAALLOCCONF=expandablesegments:True which eliminated memory fragmentation. The VPP=10 run actually used slightly more peak memory (60.2 GB vs 58.8 GB) but did not OOM because expandable segments prevented fragmentation.

VPP should be tuned for pipeline bubble reduction (see @docs/parallelisms.md), not as a memory fix.

Compatibility and Constraints

  • expandable_segments:True is incompatible with --use-nccl-ub (NCCL

user-buffer registration). See Megatron-FSDP docs.

  • When using CUDA graphs with expandable_segments:True, set

NCCLGRAPHREGISTER=0 (required on pre-Blackwell GPUs, enforced by MCore CudaGraphManager).

  • CPU offloading requires pipelinemodelparallel_size = 1.
  • Distributed optimizer requires usedistributedoptimizer = True in the

optimizer config.

  • sequenceparallelinput_regather applies only to eligible non-expert

column-parallel LoRA-A projections. Row-parallel adapters, expert adapters, TP=1, CUDA graphs, CPU activation offload, and overlapping full-layer or selective MLP activation recompute fall back to the existing path.

Measured Results

Llama3 70B SFT on 32x H100 80GB, FP8 (Current Scaling):

  • Baseline: TP=4, PP=4, VPP=5, DP=2, MBS=1, GBS=32, seq_len=4096
  • Golden GPU utilization: 709.93 TFLOP/s/GPU
  • Regression threshold: 5%

Strategy comparison: parallelism changes for memory reduction

Experiment TP PP VPP DP TFLOP/s/GPU vs Golden Peak Mem (GB) Result
Baseline 4 4 5 2 ~704 -0.8% 58.8 OOM (fragmentation)
More PP 4 8 5 1 668.0 -5.9% 53.2 Borderline perf
More TP 8 4 5 1 508.7 -28.4% 50.2 Severe regression
Baseline + expandable_segments 4 4 5 2 ~704 -0.8% ~59 Passed

Key takeaways:

  • expandable_segments:True is the winner. The baseline OOM was caused by

memory fragmentation, not insufficient capacity. Setting this env var eliminated the OOM with zero throughput cost and no parallelism changes.

  • PP=8 works for memory but loses DP (2→1), meaning 32 gradient accumulation

steps per batch, which hurts throughput by ~6%.

  • TP=8 is catastrophic (-28%) because doubling TP increases all-reduce

communication volume proportionally across NVLink, and DP=1 means no micro-batch overlap.

CPU offloading: blocked

Experiment offload_layers Result
Exp 4 2 Incompatible (PP > 1)
Exp 5 4 Incompatible (PP > 1)
Exp 6 6 Incompatible (PP > 1)

ValueError: Currently there is no support for Pipeline parallelism with CPU offloading. This approach is blocked for any model using PP > 1.

Activation recompute: expensive alternative

Selective activation recompute with mlp saved ~3 GB peak memory but cost ~16% GPU utilization on this workload. See @skills/nemo-mbridge-perf-activation-recompute/SKILL.md for full results.

LoRA + SP input re-gather

Real-checkpoint H100 training with SQuAD showed lower peak memory in all tested configurations, with workload-dependent throughput cost:

Model/config Baseline peak Input re-gather peak Memory saved Throughput change
Qwen3-8B, TP2, seq 8192 47.545 GB 42.814 GB 4.731 GB (10.0%) -6.74%
Qwen3-30B-A3B, TP4/EP4 29.890 GB 28.321 GB 1.569 GB (5.2%) -2.89%
GPT-OSS-120B, TP2/EP8 52.185 GB 51.371 GB 0.814 GB (1.6%) -0.34%

All runs had finite losses with zero skipped or NaN iterations. Two-rank BF16 and FP32 checks matched the baseline for outputs, input gradients, LoRA-A and LoRA-B gradients, and two-microbatch fused main_grad accumulation.

Code Anchors

LoRA sequence-parallel input re-gather

src/megatron/bridge/peft/lora.py
    LoRA.sequence_parallel_input_regather

src/megatron/bridge/peft/utils.py
    ParallelLinearAdapter._sequence_parallel_input_regather_eligibility()
    ParallelLinearAdapter.forward()

CPU offloading PP incompatibility (MCore)

```1303:1306:3rdparty/Megatron-LM/megatron/core/transformer/transformerconfig.py if self.cpuoffloading and self.pipelinemodelparallel_size > 1: raise ValueError( "Currently there is no support for Pipeline parallelism with CPU offloading" )


### VPP config and layer divisibility validation (MCore)

```1581:1592:3rdparty/Megatron-LM/megatron/core/transformer/transformer_config.py
            if pipeline_parallel_size and self.virtual_pipeline_model_parallel_size is not None:
                num_layers_per_middle_pipeline_rank = num_layers // pipeline_parallel_size
                if (
                    not num_layers_per_middle_pipeline_rank
                    % self.virtual_pipeline_model_parallel_size
                    == 0
                ):
                    raise ValueError(
                        f"number of layers on each middle pipeline rank:"
                        f"{num_layers_per_middle_pipeline_rank} must be divisible by virtual"
                        f"pipeline parallel degree {self.virtual_pipeline_model_parallel_size}"
                    )

Parallelism docs on interleaved pipeline schedule

``116:124:docs/parallelisms.md To minimize the pipeline bubble, the computation on each GPU can be divided into multiple subsets of layers (referred to as model chunks), rather than a single contiguous block. Enable this by setting virtualpipelinemodelparallelsize`:

modelconfig = GPTModelProvider( pipelinemodelparallelsize=4, virtualpipelinemodelparallelsize=2, # 2 model chunks per pipeline stage # ... other model parameters )


## Failure Diagnosis

| Symptom | Cause | Confirm | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| OOM on a single rank despite headroom on others | Memory fragmentation | check if `expandable_segments:True` is set | set `PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF=expandable_segments:True` |
| OOM with `expandable_segments` already set | Genuine capacity limit | check `nvidia-smi` for param/optimizer memory | increase PP, use distributed optimizer, or add recompute |
| Estimated memory exceeds GPU capacity before launch | model state or activations genuinely too large | run `estimate_training_memory` and inspect the largest component | adjust PP/TP/CP/EP, distributed optimizer, or recompute before launching |
| LoRA + SP retains unexpectedly high activation memory | full gathered LoRA-A inputs are retained until backward | check whether `cfg.peft.sequence_parallel_input_regather` is enabled and the target is eligible | set `LoRA(sequence_parallel_input_regather=True)`; verify fallback constraints |
| `ValueError: PP + CPU offloading` | using cpu_offloading with PP > 1 | check PP config | disable CPU offloading or set PP=1 |
| `RuntimeError` with `--use-nccl-ub` + expandable segments | NCCL UB incompatible with expandable allocator | check env vars | remove `expandable_segments:True` or disable `--use-nccl-ub` |

## Known Limitations

- CPU offloading is blocked when PP > 1
- Parallelism resizing (TP/PP) often has significant throughput costs
- The theoretical estimator is formula-based and does not replace runtime
  profiling or CUDA memory reports
- LoRA input re-gather does not cover row-parallel or expert adapters and may
  have negligible benefit when few eligible LoRA-A activations dominate memory

## Verification

Quick check that `expandable_segments:True` is active:

import os assert "expandablesegments:True" in os.environ.get("PYTORCHCUDAALLOCCONF", "")


For Slurm jobs, verify the env var is exported before the training command
in the launch script.

For LoRA + SP input re-gather, run the focused configuration tests and the real
two-rank MCore backward-parity test:

uv run python -m pytest \ tests/unittests/peft/testutils.py -k "sequenceparallelinputregather" \ tests/unittests/peft/testlora.py -k "sequenceparallelinputregather"

uv run python -m torch.distributed.run --nprocpernode=2 -m pytest \ tests/unittests/peft/testloraspinputregatherdistributed.py