nvidia/skills

cuopt-numerical-optimization-api

LP, MILP, and QP (beta) with cuOpt — Python, C, and CLI. Use when the user is solving LP, MILP, or QP with any cuOpt interface.

First seen Jul 6, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add nvidia/skills --skill cuopt-numerical-optimization-api

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from nvidia/skills · top by installs.

npx skills add nvidia/skills

Browse all from nvidia/skills

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Repository health

Stars 3.2K
License LICENSE-APACHE
Default branch main
Open issues 5
Status Active

Skill metadata

Parsed from SKILL.md frontmatter.

Version26.10.00
LicenseApache-2.0
More metadata
author
NVIDIA cuOpt Team
tags
["cuopt","linear-programming","milp","qp","python","c-api","cli"]

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 4,947 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 166 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 812 installs

SKILL.md

cuOpt Numerical Optimization API

Model and solve LP, MILP, and QP problems using NVIDIA cuOpt's GPU-accelerated solver.

Interface Selection

Choose the reference for the user's interface:

Interface When to use Reference
Python User is writing Python code [references/pythonapi.md](references/pythonapi.md)
C / C++ User is embedding in a C/C++ application [references/capi.md](references/capi.md)
CLI User is solving from MPS files on the command line [references/cliapi.md](references/cliapi.md)

If the interface is not yet clear, ask before writing any code.

Already using a modeling language? cuOpt also works as a solver backend for third-party modeling tools — AMPL, GAMS / GAMSPy, PuLP, JuMP, Pyomo, and CVXPY — with near-zero code changes (point the model's solver at cuOpt). CVXPY additionally covers convex QP and, in beta, QCQP / SOCP. Prefer this when the user already has a model in one of these tools rather than porting it to the cuOpt API. See Third-Party Modeling Languages.

Choosing LP vs MILP vs QP

Decide from the objective and variables:

If the objective is... And variables are... Use
Linear (sum of ci * xi) All continuous LP
Linear Some integer or binary MILP
Has squared (xx) or cross (xy) terms Continuous (integer QP not supported) QP (beta)

Prefer LP when the problem allows it. LP solves faster and has stronger optimality guarantees. Use MILP only when the problem logically requires whole numbers or yes/no decisions. Use QP only when the objective is genuinely quadratic (variance, squared error, kinetic energy).

  • Use LP when every quantity can meaningfully be fractional: flows, proportions, rates, dollars, hours, tonnes of material, etc.
  • Use MILP when the problem mentions counts of discrete entities, yes/no choices, or either/or decisions (e.g. open a facility or not, assign a person to a shift, number of trucks).
  • Use QP when the objective minimizes variance, squared error, or any expression with xx or xy terms (portfolio optimization, least squares, regularized regression).

Integer vs Continuous from Wording

Problem wording / concept Variable type Examples
Discrete entities (counts) INTEGER Workers, cars, trucks, machines, pilots, facilities, units to manufacture
Yes/no or on/off INTEGER (binary, lb=0 ub=1) Open a facility, run a machine, assign a person to a shift
Amounts that can be fractional CONTINUOUS Tonnes, litres, dollars, hours, kWh, proportion of capacity
Rates or fractions CONTINUOUS Utilization, percentage, share of budget

Rule of thumb: "How many things" → INTEGER. "How much" → CONTINUOUS.

QP Rules (all interfaces)

  • MINIMIZE only — the solver rejects MAXIMIZE for quadratic objectives. To maximize f(x), minimize -f(x) and negate the reported objective value.
  • Continuous variables only — integer QP is not supported.
  • Q should be positive semi-definite for a convex, well-posed problem.
  • Beta — API may evolve; treat as production-capable for typical convex QP.

Dual Values

Duals and reduced costs are available for LP and QP only:

  • MILP — no duals (integer optima are not continuous).
  • Quadratic constraints — duals unavailable even for LP/QP; all values return NaN.
  • PDLP warmstart — LP only; MILP solves do not accept a PDLP warmstart.

Common Issues (all interfaces)

Problem Likely cause Fix
Infeasible Conflicting constraints Check constraint logic and bounds
Unbounded Missing bounds Add variable bounds
Slow solve Large problem Set time limit; increase gap tolerance
QP rejected with MAXIMIZE QP only supports MINIMIZE Negate the objective; negate the result
QP returns non-optimal Q not PSD or badly scaled Check Q is PSD; rescale variables

Solver Settings (concepts)

Setting Purpose
time_limit Stop after N seconds
miprelativegap Stop MILP when within X% of optimal
mipabsolutetolerance Absolute MIP gap stop
logtoconsole Enable solver logging

Syntax varies by interface — see the interface reference file.