nvidia/nemoclaw · Archived

nemoclaw-maintainer-pr-comparator

Compare open PRs that address the same issue and recommend one to merge. Apply eligibility, correctness, quality, and tie-break checks. Report the score and evidence. Use when an issue has two or more open PRs.

First seen Jun 18, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add nvidia/nemoclaw --skill nemoclaw-maintainer-pr-comparator

Stronger alternatives

This repository is archived — consider an actively maintained alternative.

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from nvidia/nemoclaw · top by installs.

npx skills add nvidia/nemoclaw

Browse all from nvidia/nemoclaw

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Repository health

Stars 22.3K
License LICENSE
Default branch main
Open issues 484
Status Archived

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 7,079 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 251 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 4 installs

SKILL.md

<!-- SPDX-FileCopyrightText: Copyright (c) 2026 NVIDIA CORPORATION & AFFILIATES. All rights reserved. --> <!-- SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 -->

PR Comparator

Compare PRs for one issue. Tier 0 determines eligibility. Tiers 1 and 2 score correctness and quality. Tier 3 resolves ties. If no PR passes Tier 0, rank eligible PRs for salvage.

Prerequisites

  • gh CLI installed and authenticated
  • A target repository with an issue that has two or more open PRs

Repo policy

The defaults use NemoClaw conventions for CODEOWNERS, DCO, CodeRabbit, and docs/. Read the canonical superseded-PR attribution policy in ../nemoclaw-maintainer-policies/references/workflow-policy.md. Edit repo-policy.md for another repository.

Workflow

Copy this checklist into your response and check off each step:

PR Comparison Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Parse issue (body + comments) for acceptance criteria
- [ ] Step 2: Discover candidate PRs in the defined order
- [ ] Step 3: Detect supersession and classify transferred work
- [ ] Step 4: Run Tier 0 gates per PR
- [ ] Step 5: Run Tier 1 correctness checks per PR
- [ ] Step 6: Run Tier 2 quality checks per PR
- [ ] Step 7: Compute weighted scores
- [ ] Step 8: Apply Tier 3 ranking (happy path or degraded mode)
- [ ] Step 9: Emit verdict using templates/verdict.md

Step 1: Parse issue

Read the issue body and all comments. Extract each acceptance criterion:

gh issue view <issue-number> --json title,body,comments

Comments can add requirements that are absent from the issue body.

Step 2: Discover candidate PRs

scripts/find-candidates.sh <issue-number>

Applies a single default order with stop conditions.

Step 3: Detect supersession and transferred work

scripts/parse-supersession.sh <pr-number-1> <pr-number-2> ...

Parse the case-insensitive statement families implemented by scripts/parse-supersession.sh:

  • supersed[a-z]* before #N: supersedes #N points from the current PR to #N; superseded by #N points from #N to the current PR.
  • replac[a-z]* before #N: replaces #N points from the current PR to #N; replaced by #N points from #N to the current PR.
  • clos[a-z]* in favor of before #N: closes in favor of #N and closed in favor of #N point from #N to the current PR.
  • fold[a-z]* in before #N: folds in #N points from the current PR to #N; folded into #N points from #N to the current PR.

The bracket expressions describe the parser grammar; they are not literal PR body text. A follow-up to #N statement is a related-PR signal, not a supersession declaration, unless one of these phrases also appears. These statements record a relationship. They do not rank a candidate or prove that its diff contains another contributor's work.

For each declared or suspected replacement, compare the commits and diffs and classify the relationship:

  • independent: The PR implements the issue without carrying material code, tests, or documentation from another contributor.
  • transferred: The PR carries material work from another contributor.
  • unclear: The available evidence does not establish whether another contributor's work remains.

For transferred, apply the canonical superseded-PR attribution policy before setting a winner or recommending that the source PR be closed. For unclear, leave winner null and request maintainer judgment.

Step 4: Tier 0 gates

scripts/collect-gates.sh <pr-number>
scripts/check-coderabbit-threads.sh <pr-number>
git fetch --no-tags origin refs/heads/main:refs/remotes/origin/main
bash <(git show origin/main:.agents/skills/nemoclaw-maintainer-day/scripts/run-trusted-check-gates.sh) <pr-number>

All six gates are required. Treat PR Review Advisor output as input for maintainer review. Do not treat it as merge authorization. See checks/tier-0-gates.md.

Step 5: Tier 1 correctness

Apply the six model checks in checks/tier-1-correctness.md.

Step 6: Tier 2 quality

Apply the four model checks in checks/tier-2-quality.md.

Step 7: Weighted score

  • Build the Tier 0 eligibility set from these Boolean keys: stateopen, cigreensha, mergeable, contributorcompliance, branchprotection, and coderabbitthreads_resolved.
  • Stop if a candidate omits a required key, has an unknown key, or has a value that is not Boolean.
  • Only PRs for which all six gates are true enter happy-path scoring.
  • Each pass = full points
  • Each yellow = half points
  • Each fail = zero
  • Tier 1 weight: 2.0× per check
  • Tier 2 weight: 1.0× per check

Step 8: Tier 3 ranking

Compute the mode from the Tier 0 results. Do not accept a mode from the caller. In happy mode, set winner only to an eligible PR and set closesttoready to null. Leave winner null when the evidence does not support a merge recommendation. Do not set winner for a replacement with transferred work until the required attribution is present and verified. In degraded mode, set winner to null. Set closesttoready only to an open PR that passes contributor requirements. See tiebreakers.md.

Step 9: Emit verdict

Use templates/verdict.md and render the result with scripts/render-verdict.py. Stop if the renderer exits with a nonzero status. Do not recommend a merge. The renderer validates the gate schema, mode, winner eligibility, and salvage-candidate eligibility. The reviewer remains responsible for the score, ranking, and evidence. For each judgment, include evidence, the inference, and the score.

Reference files

  • [repo-policy.md](repo-policy.md) — Repository settings.
  • [checks/tier-0-gates.md](checks/tier-0-gates.md) — Six eligibility gates.
  • [checks/tier-1-correctness.md](checks/tier-1-correctness.md) — Six correctness checks.
  • [checks/tier-2-quality.md](checks/tier-2-quality.md) — Four quality checks.
  • [tiebreakers.md](tiebreakers.md) — Tier 3 ranking and degraded mode.
  • [templates/verdict.md](templates/verdict.md) — Output template.
  • [validation/backtest.md](validation/backtest.md) — Historical test cases for the skill.

Scripts (execute, do not read)

  • scripts/find-candidates.sh — PR discovery
  • scripts/collect-gates.sh — Tier 0 gate evaluation
  • scripts/check-coderabbit-threads.sh — GraphQL thread-resolution check
  • scripts/parse-supersession.sh — body parsing for supersession refs
  • scripts/render-verdict.py — verdict scorecard renderer

Limits

Run nemoclaw-maintainer-cross-issue-sweep separately when you need related-issue evidence.

This skill does not:

  • run PR code against adversarial inputs
  • scan other issues for related behavior
  • simulate reverts against related PRs
  • run static analyzers such as CodeQL or Semgrep