npx skills add smithery/neurofoo --skill ooda
neurofoo/agent-skills
ooda
OODA loop decision framework (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act). Use for complex decisions, problem-solving, unclear situations, or when someone is jumping to solutions without analysis.
Installation
npx skills add neurofoo/agent-skills --skill ooda
Similar popular skills
Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.
Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "fi…
3.3M installsBrowser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, includ…
810.4K installsReview UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "chec…
617.3K installsBuild, deploy, evaluate, optimize, fine-tune, and manage Microsoft Foundry agents, models, and …
576.5K installsPrepare azd-based Azure projects for deployment: generates azure.yaml, infrastructure (Bicep/Te…
568.3K installsAlso in this package
Other skills from neurofoo/agent-skills · top by installs.
npx skills add neurofoo/agent-skills
More details
Agent compatibility
Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.
Also listed on
Alternate registries and mirrors of this skill.
Repository health
main
Package contents
Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.
-
skill md
SKILL.md3,640 B -
docs
SUMMARY.md194 B
History
- First seen on skills.sh
- First recorded snapshot · 121 installs
SKILL.md
OODA Loop Analysis
Run a complete OODA loop (Observe, Orient, Decide, Execute) on the problem or decision provided.
Instructions
Work through each phase sequentially. Be thorough but concise.
Phase 1: OBSERVE
Gather facts before analyzing. Ask: "What is actually happening?"
Output:
- Current State: Facts only, no interpretation
- Signals: What prompted this inquiry
- Scope: Boundaries of the situation
- Constraints: Resources, time, rules, dependencies
- Unknowns: Information gaps to acknowledge
Phase 2: ORIENT
Analyze and build understanding. Ask: "Why is this happening?"
Output:
- Root Cause Analysis: Underlying drivers, not just symptoms
- Mental Models: Frameworks that apply (first principles, inversion, second-order effects, etc.)
- Patterns: Similar situations and their outcomes
- Stakeholder Views: How different parties see this
- Assumptions: What we're taking for granted
- Biases: Cognitive traps to watch for
Phase 3: DECIDE
Choose from viable options. Ask: "What's the best approach?"
Output:
- Options (minimum 3):
- Option A — Pros / Cons / Risk level - Option B — Pros / Cons / Risk level - Option C — Pros / Cons / Risk level
- Recommendation: Selected approach with rationale
- Success Criteria: How we'll know it worked
- Contingency: Fallback if primary approach fails
Phase 4: EXECUTE
Plan implementation with verification. Ask: "How do we act and confirm?"
Output:
- Action Steps: Ordered, concrete steps
- Verification Points: How to check progress at each stage
- Timeline: Realistic schedule
- First Action: The immediate next step
Feedback Loop
End with:
- Key Risks: What could derail this
- Review Trigger: When to reassess (time or event based)
Format
Use clear headers for each phase. Be direct and actionable. Avoid fluff.
Examples
Business: Product Launch Timing
Context: Feature 85% complete, competitor launching similar feature next month.
OBSERVE: Core functionality works; edge cases unhandled. Competitor announced similar launch. 3 engineers available; Q4 revenue targets looming.
ORIENT: Root tension is first-mover advantage vs. quality reputation. Last rushed launch caused 3-month support burden. Sales wants it now; Support worried; Engineering wants 2 more weeks.
DECIDE: Options evaluated—Launch now (high risk), Delay 4 weeks (medium), Soft launch to 10 customers (low risk). Selected: Soft launch → gather feedback → full launch in 3 weeks.
EXECUTE: Identify 10 beta customers (2 days) → Deploy with feature flag (1 day) → Monitor 2 weeks → Full launch with case studies.
Personal: Job Offer Decision
Context: 3 years at current company, plateaued. Offer is 30% raise, bigger scope, requires travel.
OBSERVE: Current role comfortable but stagnant. New role offers growth but spouse's job isn't portable; young child at home.
ORIENT: Root feeling is being undervalued + seeking growth. Models: Regret minimization; total compensation (salary + learning + relationships).
DECIDE: Selected transparent conversation with current manager + gather more info on new role before deciding.
EXECUTE: List non-negotiables → Career conversation with manager → Talk to future team → 48-hour reflection before final decision.
$ARGUMENTS