neurofoo/agent-skills

ooda

OODA loop decision framework (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act). Use for complex decisions, problem-solving, unclear situations, or when someone is jumping to solutions without analysis.

First seen Jan 22, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add neurofoo/agent-skills --skill ooda

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from neurofoo/agent-skills · top by installs.

npx skills add neurofoo/agent-skills

Browse all from neurofoo/agent-skills

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Also listed on

Alternate registries and mirrors of this skill.

Repository health

Stars 113
License LICENSE.txt
Default branch main
Open issues 1
Status Active

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 3,640 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 194 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 121 installs

SKILL.md

OODA Loop Analysis

Run a complete OODA loop (Observe, Orient, Decide, Execute) on the problem or decision provided.

Instructions

Work through each phase sequentially. Be thorough but concise.

Phase 1: OBSERVE

Gather facts before analyzing. Ask: "What is actually happening?"

Output:

  • Current State: Facts only, no interpretation
  • Signals: What prompted this inquiry
  • Scope: Boundaries of the situation
  • Constraints: Resources, time, rules, dependencies
  • Unknowns: Information gaps to acknowledge

Phase 2: ORIENT

Analyze and build understanding. Ask: "Why is this happening?"

Output:

  • Root Cause Analysis: Underlying drivers, not just symptoms
  • Mental Models: Frameworks that apply (first principles, inversion, second-order effects, etc.)
  • Patterns: Similar situations and their outcomes
  • Stakeholder Views: How different parties see this
  • Assumptions: What we're taking for granted
  • Biases: Cognitive traps to watch for

Phase 3: DECIDE

Choose from viable options. Ask: "What's the best approach?"

Output:

  • Options (minimum 3):

- Option A — Pros / Cons / Risk level - Option B — Pros / Cons / Risk level - Option C — Pros / Cons / Risk level

  • Recommendation: Selected approach with rationale
  • Success Criteria: How we'll know it worked
  • Contingency: Fallback if primary approach fails

Phase 4: EXECUTE

Plan implementation with verification. Ask: "How do we act and confirm?"

Output:

  • Action Steps: Ordered, concrete steps
  • Verification Points: How to check progress at each stage
  • Timeline: Realistic schedule
  • First Action: The immediate next step

Feedback Loop

End with:

  • Key Risks: What could derail this
  • Review Trigger: When to reassess (time or event based)

Format

Use clear headers for each phase. Be direct and actionable. Avoid fluff.

Examples

Business: Product Launch Timing

Context: Feature 85% complete, competitor launching similar feature next month.

OBSERVE: Core functionality works; edge cases unhandled. Competitor announced similar launch. 3 engineers available; Q4 revenue targets looming.

ORIENT: Root tension is first-mover advantage vs. quality reputation. Last rushed launch caused 3-month support burden. Sales wants it now; Support worried; Engineering wants 2 more weeks.

DECIDE: Options evaluated—Launch now (high risk), Delay 4 weeks (medium), Soft launch to 10 customers (low risk). Selected: Soft launch → gather feedback → full launch in 3 weeks.

EXECUTE: Identify 10 beta customers (2 days) → Deploy with feature flag (1 day) → Monitor 2 weeks → Full launch with case studies.

Personal: Job Offer Decision

Context: 3 years at current company, plateaued. Offer is 30% raise, bigger scope, requires travel.

OBSERVE: Current role comfortable but stagnant. New role offers growth but spouse's job isn't portable; young child at home.

ORIENT: Root feeling is being undervalued + seeking growth. Models: Regret minimization; total compensation (salary + learning + relationships).

DECIDE: Selected transparent conversation with current manager + gather more info on new role before deciding.

EXECUTE: List non-negotiables → Career conversation with manager → Talk to future team → 48-hour reflection before final decision.

$ARGUMENTS