Check AI Transparency

Check whether a publication record is ready for human review. This is an evidence checklist, not legal advice or a compliance certification.

All paths below are relative to this skill's directory. If you are running from elsewhere, use an absolute path to scripts/check_transparency.py.

Workflow

1. Copy the schema from references/record-schema.md and describe each output.
2. Run:

``bash python3 scripts/check_transparency.py /absolute/path/to/record.json ``

1. Resolve each item in gaps or document why it is not applicable.
2. Keep machine-readable provenance and human-readable disclosure as separate controls.
3. Escalate jurisdiction-specific decisions to qualified counsel or the responsible policy owner.

Interpretation

• READYFORREVIEW: nothing is outstanding; it does not mean legally compliant.
• READYWITHREVIEW_ITEMS: nothing required is missing, but a human decision

is outstanding (for example whether signer trust must be evaluated for this release). Advisory items never block readiness.

• GAPS_FOUND: one or more required evidence or disclosure fields are absent.
• UNKNOWN: the record could not be reliably evaluated.

Read requiredgapcount and reviewitemcount separately; only the first blocks. For Anthropic text, an UNVERIFIABLE detector state is acceptable only when a truthful human-readable disclosure is present and the limitation is retained. Text-bearing formats include PDF, DOCX, ODT, JSON and XML, not only text/*.