Respond to your data being breached — triage by what actually leaked, the freeze/rotate/monitor ladder in the right order, and the calibrated watchfulness that follows, without panic or paralysis. Use when someone asks my data was in a breach what do I do, I got a breach notification letter, my SSN/ID number leaked, or should I freeze my credit. Produces the leaked-data triage, the ordered response ladder with the do-today items, the monitoring plan, and the breach-letter decode (including what…
Respond to your data being breached — triage by what actually leaked, the freeze/rotate/monitor ladder in the right order, and the calibrated watchfulness that follows, without panic or paralysis.
Use when someone asks my data was in a breach what do I do, I got a breach notification letter, my SSN/ID number leaked, or should I freeze my credit.
Produces the leaked-data triage, the ordered response ladder with the do-today items, the monitoring plan, and the breach-letter decode (including what the free credit monitoring offer is and isn't).
Similar popular skills
Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.
Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.
Claude CodeNot declared
CursorNot declared
CodexNot declared
GitHub CopilotNot declared
WindsurfNot declared
Gemini CLINot declared
ClineNot declared
OpenCodeNot declared
Repository health
Stars1.3K
LicenseLICENSE
Default branchmain
Open issues7
Status
Active
Package contents
Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.
skill mdSKILL.md6,042 B
docsSUMMARY.md577 B
History
First seen on skills.sh
First recorded snapshot · 2 installs
SKILL.md
Data Breach Response Skill
The breach notification letter arrives months late, written by lawyers to minimize alarm and liability in the same paragraph — and the reader's real question is buried: what did they get, and what do I actually do? The answer depends entirely on the first part: a leaked password and a leaked government ID number are different emergencies with different ladders. This skill triages by what leaked, orders the response (some steps are today, most aren't), and decodes the letter itself — including the free-monitoring offer, which is worth taking and worth understanding.
What This Skill Produces
The triage — what leaked, mapped to what it enables: account takeover, financial fraud, identity theft, targeted phishing
The ladder — do-today / this-week / ongoing, ordered by damage-prevented-per-minute
The monitoring plan — what to watch, where, at what cadence — calibrated, not paranoid
The letter decode — what the notification actually admits, and what the monitoring offer covers
Required Inputs
Ask for these if not provided:
What leaked — from the letter or breach-lookup: email? passwords (hashed or plain — the letter usually says)? card numbers? government ID / SSN? medical? The whole response keys off this list
The account's blast radius — was that password reused? (The honest answer decides half the ladder) Is the breached account an identity anchor (primary email)?
Jurisdiction, loosely — credit freezes, fraud alerts, and ID-theft reporting are country-specific; the ladder names the step types with verify-locally flags
What's been noticed — any weird charges, logins, or mail already? That upgrades the response from preventive to active-incident
Framework: The Leak-to-Ladder Map
Passwords leaked → today: change it, then everywhere it was reused (the breach's real payload is credential-stuffing every other site), enable 2FA on the anchors (email first — it resets everything else), and check the account's forwarding/recovery settings if it's email (persistence tricks outlive password changes).
Card numbers → today: freeze/reissue via the bank app, review recent transactions, set transaction alerts. Painless, fast, and the bank's problem-handling here is mature.
Government ID / SSN → this week, and it's the big one: a credit freeze at the bureaus (the strongest single move where available — free in many jurisdictions, verify locally; it blocks new-account fraud at the source), fraud alerts as the lighter alternative, tax-filing and benefits-fraud awareness where relevant. The ID number can't be rotated like a password — which is why the freeze, monitoring, and calibrated long-term watchfulness are the response.
Email + context leaked → the phishing upgrade: breach data fuels targeted scams that reference real details ("your recent order at…") — the ladder includes the expectation-setting line: incoming messages referencing this breach are now more suspicious, not more credible (route to [scam-message-decoder](../scam-message-decoder/SKILL.md)).
The letter decode: "no evidence of misuse" means "we haven't seen it yet," not "you're safe" · the free credit monitoring is worth activating (it's detection, not prevention — it tells you after something happened; the freeze is prevention) · class-action notices are separate and slow · and the offer's enrollment deadline is a real date worth catching.
[The leaked items → the specific risks, plainly — no vague "your data may be at risk"]
The Ladder
Today: [the leak-keyed items] · This week: [freeze/alerts (verify-locally), monitoring enrollment before its deadline] · Ongoing: [the calibrated watch: statements cadence, credit-report cadence, the phishing expectation]
The Letter, Decoded
["No evidence of misuse" translation · what the monitoring offer does and doesn't do · deadlines in the letter, extracted]
If Something's Already Wrong
[Active-fraud branch: dispute processes, the ID-theft report path (jurisdiction-flagged), the paper trail to start]
Freeze mechanics, fraud-alert rules, and identity-theft reporting vary by country — verify the flagged steps locally. A freeze blocks new credit, not existing-account fraud; the ladder covers both for that reason.
Quality Checks
Every response item traces to a specific leaked data type — no generic hygiene dump
The reuse question was asked and its answer shaped the ladder
Freeze vs. monitoring is explained as prevention vs. detection
Jurisdiction-specific mechanisms are typed and flagged, not asserted
The active-incident branch exists and upgrades the response when triggered
Anti-Patterns
Do not respond to every breach identically — a forum password and an ID number are different events
Do not present the monitoring offer as protection — it's a smoke detector, not a lock; take it anyway
Do not induce panic or dismiss — the calibrated middle is the product
Do not skip the email-anchor check — the account that resets all others is the one that matters most
Do not let "no evidence of misuse" close the case — the ladder runs on what leaked, not on the letter's comfort