matteocervelli/llms

fix

Fix bugs and technical debt with minimal ceremony. Issue GitHub optional — provide one for traceability or work free-form. Replaces /issue-fix.

First seen May 25, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add matteocervelli/llms --skill fix

Also in this package

Other skills from matteocervelli/llms · top by installs.

npx skills add matteocervelli/llms

Browse all from matteocervelli/llms

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Repository health

Stars 25
License LICENSE
Default branch main
Open issues 0
Status Active

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 5,324 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 156 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 9 installs

SKILL.md

Fix Skill

Purpose

Minimal-ceremony fix workflow for bugs and technical debt. GitHub issue is optional — provide one for traceability, or describe the problem free-form.

Replaces /issue-fix. Key differences from the old skill:

  • Issue number not required
  • No automatic PR (opt-in with --pr)
  • Cleaner ceremony: branch → fix → security scan → regression test → commit

When to Use vs Other Skills

/quick /fix /implementation
Ceremony None Minimal Full
Size Tiny (minutes) Small-medium Medium-large
Type Anything Bug / tech debt Feature / refactor
Issue Optional Optional Optional
PR No Optional (--pr) Yes
Tests No Regression only Full TDD

Usage

/fix "broken login after password change"
/fix --issue 42 "auth regression on mobile"
/fix --pr "memory leak in worker queue"        # create PR after commit
/fix --issue 15 --pr "null pointer in parser"  # issue + PR

Workflow

1. Analysis

If issue provided:

gh issue view <N>

Complexity check — pick one path:

Simple fix (root cause obvious from description, ≤2 files, no security implications): → Reason through root cause directly, proceed to Step 2.

Complex fix (scope unclear, multiple files, security implications, or ambiguous cause): → Automatically enter Plan Mode:

  1. Call EnterPlanMode
  2. Spawn a Plan agent (model: sonnet) with all gathered context to produce:

- Root cause analysis - Minimal change plan (files + rationale) - Regression test strategy - Security implications (if any)

  1. Call ExitPlanMode — present plan to user, wait for approval
  2. After approval, proceed to Step 2

Root cause still unclear after analysis? Stop and run
/diagnose "<symptom description>" first. Return here once the investigation
identifies the root cause.

2. Branch

# With issue number
git checkout -b fix/<N>-brief-description

# Without issue (free-form)
git checkout -b fix/brief-description

Check for open release branches first:

git branch -r --list 'origin/release/*' | sed 's|origin/||'

If a release branch exists, ask: "Target release branch or main?"

3. Implement

Fix following these principles:

  • Minimal: touch only what's needed — resist refactoring adjacent code
  • Secure: validate inputs, handle errors cleanly, no data leaks
  • Defensive: null checks, proper error boundaries

4. Test

Write a regression test to verify the fix:

# Python
ruff check . && mypy .
pytest -k "test_<relevant>"  # Full suite runs on CI; locally run only relevant tests

# JS/TS
npm run lint && npm run typecheck
npm test -- --testPathPattern="<relevant>"

Test requirements:

  • Bug reproduction test (confirms fix works)
  • Security edge cases if the bug has security implications
  • Trivial fixes: add a test case to the nearest existing test file (no new test file needed)

5. Gate

Run /security-verify scan before committing — non-negotiable per rules/security-gate.md.

6. Commit

# With issue
git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
fix: <description>

Fixes #<N>
EOF
)"

# Without issue
git commit -m "fix: <description>"

7. Optional PR

Only if --pr flag or explicitly requested:

gh pr create --title "fix: <description>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Root Cause
[brief]

## Fix
[what changed and why]

## Testing
- [ ] Regression test added
- [ ] Security edge cases verified
EOF
)"

Otherwise: push branch, leave PR for later or skip entirely.

8. Update CHANGELOG

Add to [Unreleased] section:

- fix: <description> (#N if applicable)

9. Smoke Tests + Review

Always close with a short manual smoke test checklist (3–5 items). Infer the interface type:

  • REST endpointcurl commands covering happy path + error path
  • Frontend → numbered browser steps (open URL → action → verify state)
  • CLI → shell commands including --help and one error case
  • Library → one-liner python -c "..." or inline snippet

Then suggest (in order, don't skip the first):

→ /review changes  ← always before /pre-commit
→ /pre-commit (only if --pr flag or user explicitly asks)

Do NOT jump straight to /pre-commit/review changes should always come first.


Tech Debt Remediation

/fix is also the right skill for tech debt when:

  • Change is isolated (no interface changes, no API breakage)
  • Requires updating existing tests, not writing new suites
  • Impact is contained to 1-3 files

For larger tech debt (cross-cutting, interface changes, architectural rework), use /implementation. Tracking: GitHub milestone TECH-DEBT.

Tips

  • Keep fixes minimal — resist refactoring unrelated code
  • Always document root cause in commit message or PR body for future reference