maroffo/claude-forge

refine-requirements

Structured requirements gathering before planning. Use when request has ambiguities, multiple valid approaches, or implicit decisions.

First seen Mar 1, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add maroffo/claude-forge --skill refine-requirements

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from maroffo/claude-forge · top by installs.

npx skills add maroffo/claude-forge

Browse all from maroffo/claude-forge

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Repository health

Stars 16
License LICENSE
Default branch main
Open issues 6
Status Active

Skill metadata

Parsed from SKILL.md frontmatter.

Declared agents claude-code

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 3,019 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 161 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 20 installs

SKILL.md

ABOUTME: Structured requirements refinement using AskUserQuestion before planning

ABOUTME: Identifies gray areas, clarifies with concrete options, captures decisions for the plan

Requirements Refinement

Invoke explicitly or triggered automatically by plan-first-workflow for 🟡/🔴 tasks.

Process

  1. Pick the scope mode before any other question. Classify the task, then:
Task class Modes offered Applied
bugfix, refactor none, no question asked Hold Scope, silently
feature Hold Scope (recommended) / Selective Expansion / Reduction user's answer
greenfield Hold Scope (recommended) / Selective Expansion / Reduction / Expansion user's answer
unsure which class none, no question asked Hold Scope, silently

One AskUserQuestion for the mode where modes are offered; Hold Scope is the recommended option. Never ask on a bugfix or refactor, and never ask when the class is unclear: Hold is the escape from misclassifying.

- Hold Scope: clarify HOW to build what was requested, never WHETHER to add more (steps 1-4 below as written) - Selective Expansion: adjacent additions may be proposed, one at a time - Expansion: same, with a wider radius (greenfield only) - Reduction: propose cuts to what was requested, one at a time

In Selective Expansion and Expansion: each proposed addition is its own AskUserQuestion; never bundle. Reduction works the same way for cuts: one question per cut, nothing dropped silently. Declined proposals become deferred ideas, exactly as in Hold Scope.

  1. Identify gray areas by domain:

- Visual → layout, density, interactions, empty states - API/CLI → response format, error handling, auth flow - Infrastructure → scaling, redundancy, monitoring - Integration → protocol, auth method, error recovery

  1. For each gray area, use AskUserQuestion:

- Concrete options ("JWT" not "Option A"), 2-4 choices - Include "You decide" when Claude's discretion is fine - Follow threads: each answer may reveal the next question

  1. Scope guard: in Hold Scope (and outside the opted-in mode's radius), if user suggests new scope, capture as deferred idea, redirect back
  1. Output: list of decisions to include as ## Decisions in the plan file

Anti-patterns

  • Generic questions ("What are your requirements?") → ask about specific decisions
  • Checklist walking → follow the thread the user cares about
  • Expanding scope in Hold Scope → clarify HOW to implement what's requested, not WHETHER to add more
  • Asking the mode question on a bugfix, a refactor, or an unclear task → Hold applies, silently
  • Bundling several additions into one "expansion accepted" → one question per addition, always