Writing Structure Planner

Table of Contents

• [Core Principles](#core-principles)
• [Workflow](#workflow)
• [Structure Types Overview](#structure-types-overview)
• [Guardrails](#guardrails)
• [Quick Reference](#quick-reference)

Related skills: Use mcphee-structure-derivation first when you hold a raw research corpus and no structure yet. It runs McPhee's coding-and-sorting pass to derive and name a shape. It then hands the sorted components here, for diagramming and gold-coin placement. Use writing-revision for revising existing prose, writing-stickiness for memorable messaging, writing-pre-publish-checklist for final quality checks.

Core Principles

1. Structure arises from material: Don't impose a structure - let the content suggest its natural organization
2. Blueprint before building: Always plan structure before drafting
3. Invisible architecture: Good structure is invisible to readers - they just experience flow
4. Three options minimum: Always sketch at least 3 structural options before choosing
5. Gold-coin distribution: Place reader rewards throughout, especially in the middle

Workflow

Copy this checklist and track your progress:

Structure Planning:
- [ ] Step 1: Analyze material thoroughly
- [ ] Step 2: Explore structure options
- [ ] Step 3: Select and refine structure

Before starting: Review [resources/structure-types.md](resources/structure-types.md) for the 8 structure types, diagramming method, and selection criteria.

For analysis steps, output findings to analysis files in the current directory to ensure thorough coverage of all material. These analysis files remain in the project for your review.

Step 1: Analyze material thoroughly

Step 1.1: Gather and understand all material completely. Read everything the user has provided.

Step 1.2: Create analysis file writer-structure-material-analysis.md and output: all key points, anecdotes, data, quotes, and examples found in the material. Identify themes and patterns. Determine what's most important vs. supporting detail. Identify the natural organizing principle (time, space, importance, comparison). Note reader considerations (busy? engaged? unfamiliar? expert?).

Step 1.3: Present the material analysis to the user and confirm understanding is complete. Ask: "Did I miss any important material or themes?"

See [resources/structure-types.md - Gather Your Material](resources/structure-types.md#step-1-gather-your-material) for detailed guidance.

Step 2: Explore structure options

Step 2.1: Read the analysis file. Review all [8 Structure Types](resources/structure-types.md#structure-types) with examples.

Step 2.2: Create analysis file writer-structure-options.md and sketch 3 different structure options. For each option include: structure type name, diagram sketch, how user's material maps to it, pros and cons.

Step 2.3: Test each option against [Structure Selection Criteria](resources/structure-types.md#structure-selection-criteria). Present all 3 options to the user with your recommendation.

See [resources/structure-types.md - Sketch 3 Options](resources/structure-types.md#step-3-sketch-3-options) for detailed process.

Step 3: Select and refine structure

Step 3.1: Read the options file. Based on user's choice (or your recommendation if they defer), select the structure that best serves the material.

Step 3.2: Create the final annotated structure diagram. Map key moments and transitions. Identify where to place [gold-coin moments](resources/structure-types.md#gold-coin-placement-strategy) throughout (especially middle sections). Annotate with pacing and transition notes.

Step 3.3: Verify structure supports the through-line (promise -> delivery -> resonance). Test: Does this feel inevitable or forced? Present final annotated structure diagram for user review before drafting.

See [resources/structure-types.md - Select and Refine](resources/structure-types.md#step-5-select-and-refine) for detailed guidance.

How to know if structure is working:

If working: Readers won't notice it, they'll just experience flow and feel the piece is "well-organized."

If not working: Readers will feel lost, wonder "where is this going?", or abandon before the end.

Validate using [resources/evaluators/rubricstructure.json](resources/evaluators/rubricstructure.json). Minimum standard: Average score >= 3.5.

Structure Types Overview

The 8 structure types available (see [resources/structure-types.md](resources/structure-types.md) for full details):

Guardrails

Requirements:

1. Material-first: Always understand the material before suggesting structure. Never impose a structure without understanding content.
2. Three options: Always generate at least 3 structural options. The second or third is often best.
3. User collaboration: Present options and let the user choose. Don't dictate structure.
4. Gold-coin placement: Every structure must include strategic placement of reader rewards, especially in the middle.
5. Test the structure: Ask "does this feel inevitable or forced?" before finalizing.

Common pitfalls:

• Defaulting to chronological when another structure serves better
• Front-loading all strong material in the opening
• Ignoring the "saggy middle" problem
• Imposing structure without understanding material
• Skipping the 3-option comparison step

Quick Reference

Key resources:

• [resources/structure-types.md](resources/structure-types.md): All 8 structure types, diagramming method, gold-coin strategy, selection criteria
• [resources/evaluators/rubricstructure.json](resources/evaluators/rubricstructure.json): Quality scoring criteria

Inputs required:

• User's material, ideas, or topic description
• Target audience (if known)
• Any constraints (length, format, publication)

Outputs produced:

• Material analysis document
• 3 structure options with pros/cons
• Final annotated structure diagram with gold-coin placement
• Recommended writing order