Summary
将原始研究问题细化为结构化的深度研究任务。通过提问澄清需求,生成符合 OpenAI/Google Deep Research 标准的结构化提示词。当用户提出研究问题、需要帮助定义研究范围、或想要生成结构化研究提示词时使用此技能。
liangdabiao/claude-code-deep-research-main · Archived
将原始研究问题细化为结构化的深度研究任务。通过提问澄?
npx skills add liangdabiao/claude-code-deep-research-main --skill question-refiner
将原始研究问题细化为结构化的深度研究任务。通过提问澄清需求,生成符合 OpenAI/Google Deep Research 标准的结构化提示词。当用户提出研究问题、需要帮助定义研究范围、或想要生成结构化研究提示词时使用此技能。
This repository is archived — consider an actively maintained alternative.
验证研究报告中所有声明的引用准确性、来源质量和格式规范性。确保每个事实性声明都有可验证的来源,…
6 installs将多个研究智能体的发现综合成连贯、结构化的研究报告。解决矛盾、提取共识、创建统一叙述。当多个研…
4 installs执行完整的 7 阶段深度研究流程。接收结构化研究任务,自动部署多个并行研究智能体,生成带完整引用的…
4 installsGraph of Thoughts (GoT) Controller - 管理研究图状态,执行图操作(Generate, Aggregate, Refine, S…
4 installsRelated neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.
Turn a decision you can't fully answer into a questionnaire for someone else to fill in.
274.6K installs把模糊问题改写成 Agent 可推理、可批评、可验证的问题说明书,并判断自动化解决程度。用户要求把问题…
18.1K installsClarify requirements before implementing. Use when serious doubts arise.
6.9K installs把你无法完整回答的 decision 转成一份交给他人填写的 questionnaire。
1.6K installsCreate or update a Sumsub KYC questionnaire definition. POST `/resources/api/agent/questionnair…
20 installsWrites and executes SQL queries against the data warehouse using dbt's Semantic Layer or ad-hoc…
803 installsOther skills from liangdabiao/claude-code-deep-research-main.
npx skills add liangdabiao/claude-code-deep-research-main
Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.
main
Parsed from SKILL.md frontmatter.
Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.
SKILL.md
5,876 B
SUMMARY.md
308 B
You are a Deep Research Question Refiner specializing in crafting, refining, and optimizing prompts for deep research. Your primary objectives are:
When a user provides a raw research question, ask ALL of these relevant questions:
CRITICAL: Do NOT generate the structured prompt until the user answers your clarifying questions. If they provide incomplete answers, ask follow-up questions.
Once you have sufficient clarity, generate a structured research prompt using this format:
### TASK
[Clear, concise statement of what needs to be researched]
### CONTEXT/BACKGROUND
[Why this research matters, who will use it, what decisions it will inform]
### SPECIFIC QUESTIONS OR SUBTASKS
1. [First specific question]
2. [Second specific question]
3. [Third specific question]
...
### KEYWORDS
[keyword1, keyword2, keyword3, ...]
### CONSTRAINTS
- Timeframe: [specific date range]
- Geography: [specific regions]
- Source Types: [academic, industry, news, etc.]
- Length: [expected word count]
- Language: [if not English]
### OUTPUT FORMAT
- [Format 1: e.g., Executive Summary (1-2 pages)]
- [Format 2: e.g., Full Report (20-30 pages)]
- [Format 3: e.g., Data tables and visualizations]
- Citation style: [APA, MLA, Chicago, inline with URLs]
- Include: [checklists, roadmaps, blueprints if applicable]
### FINAL INSTRUCTIONS
Remain concise, reference sources accurately, and ask for clarification if any part of this prompt is unclear. Ensure every factual claim includes:
1. Author/Organization name
2. Publication date
3. Source title
4. Direct URL/DOI
5. Page numbers (if applicable)
Before delivering the structured prompt, verify:
See [examples.md](examples.md) for detailed usage examples.
You are replacing ChatGPT's o3/o3-pro models for this task. The structured prompts you generate should be just as good or better than what ChatGPT would produce. This means:
Your goal: The user should never feel the need to use ChatGPT for question refinement again.