kkenny0/lode · Archived

recall

Recall recent project memory at the start of an agentic coding session. Use this skill for "/tracework:recall", when the user says "开工", "session start", "start session", "recall context", "继续上次", "接着做", or asks what to remember before implementing in the current repo. Intra-project only; does not do cross-project retrieval.

First seen Jun 15, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add kkenny0/lode --skill recall

Stronger alternatives

This repository is archived — consider an actively maintained alternative.

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from kkenny0/lode · top by installs.

npx skills add kkenny0/lode

Browse all from kkenny0/lode

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Repository health

Stars 1
License MIT
Default branch main
Open issues 0
Status Archived

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 6,572 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 358 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 1 installs

SKILL.md

Session Start Recall

This skill prepares a bounded project context at the start of a session so the developer and AI do not restart from zero. It is useful when durable Tracework memory exists; it is not required before daily, weekly, monthly, or query can produce their best available output.

Recall is a durable-memory surface, not a report fallback. Unlike daily or weekly reports, it must not use git history to invent missing memory.

Scope

  • Intra-project only.
  • Raw entries are the semantic source of truth.
  • Artifact dossier entries are optional source navigation plus recorded context.
  • Decision context entries are optional synthesized decision-replay hints from

{vault}/raw/decisions/{project-slug}.json.

  • If the saved decision index is missing, invalid, empty, or older than the raw

entries, the helper refreshes the derived decision index from raw entries as a best-effort side effect, then uses that fresh Decision Context.

  • Do not use git commits as fallback in v1.
  • Do not invent history when no vault data exists.

Workflow

Pre-Check: Vault Health

Before running the recall helper, do a quick health check:

  1. Resolve vault path from config
  2. Check if {vault}/raw/weeks/ has any {slug}.json files
  3. If no raw entries exist at all: suggest /tracework:capture and stop
  4. If raw entries exist but are older than 14 days: note staleness in output
  5. If recall_context.py is missing: warn and suggest re-install

If the pre-check passes, continue to the main workflow:

  1. Resolve the current project context.
  2. Run the helper:
python <this-skill>/scripts/recall_context.py --cwd "$PWD" --limit 12

If the user explicitly names a project slug, pass --slug <slug>. If the user or config provides a vault path, pass --vault <path>.

  1. Read references/recall-output-template.md.
  2. Produce Markdown in the conversation.

Output Contract

The response must include:

  • Recent progress
  • Relevant decisions
  • Decision Context, when {vault}/raw/decisions/{project-slug}.json exists

or can be rebuilt in memory from raw entries

  • Abandoned alternatives that may affect the current task
  • Open questions
  • Risks to check before implementation
  • Repo-local docs worth reading
  • Potentially stale intent artifacts
  • Suggested entry point for the current session

If there is no vault or no raw data, say that Tracework has no durable memory for the current project yet, suggest using /tracework:capture after this session, and suggest /tracework:cold-start-interview if no config exists. Do not fill the gap with git history or assumptions.

Evidence Rules

  • Cite raw entry timestamps for decisions, risks, abandoned alternatives, and

open questions.

  • Cite artifact ids for docs worth reading.
  • Cite decision context sourceentryrefs when using decision_context;

preserve confidence and inference_notes instead of presenting inferred nodes as fact.

  • Treat artifact dossiers as independently readable but not independently

authoritative. artifactsummary can explain scope and recorded context; direct evidence still comes from raw entries, evidencerefs, typed source_refs, or source-of-truth artifact references.

  • Include decisioncontextsource when present, especially if rebuilt=true,

so the user can see whether the section came from a saved index or an in-memory freshness rebuild.

  • Treat intentartifactflags as read-only staleness hints. Phrase them as

"may need review" rather than facts. Do not write or propose diffs from this skill.

  • Use "Inferred" wording when the helper returns weak or old-schema entries.
  • Missing artifact dossier index is acceptable and must not block output.

Storage

This skill reads:

  • {vault}/raw/weeks/{YYYY-WNN}/{project-slug}.json
  • {vault}/raw/artifacts/{project-slug}.json when present
  • {vault}/raw/decisions/{project-slug}.json when present

This skill writes {vault}/raw/decisions/{project-slug}.json only when the derived decision index is missing, invalid, empty, or older than raw entries. Raw entries remain the source of truth.

Artifact Discovery

The artifact dossier index at {vault}/raw/artifacts/{slug}.json is a structured catalog of durable project documents plus recorded context. When present, use it to enrich the recall output:

  1. Find related docs: When raw entries mention related_docs or

artifactcontext, cross-reference the artifact dossier index for topic tags, decision threads, and artifactsummary.scope to find adjacent documents.

  1. Detect stale documents: Artifacts with status: superseded or a

superseded_by field indicate documents that have been replaced — flag these so the next session doesn't rely on outdated references.

  1. Navigate by topic: Artifact topics, decision_threads, and

artifactsummary.keyclaims provide stable retrieval terms for finding documents relevant to the current session.

  1. Respect availability: Use sourceavailability, lastseen, and

deletion_behavior to show whether the source document can still be opened and whether the dossier remains useful if it cannot.

In the "Docs worth reading" section, include for each artifact:

  • Why the artifact matters (from artifact_summary.scope, topics, or recorded

raw artifact_context.scope)

  • Whether it is still active (from status)
  • Source availability and deletion behavior when present
  • Evidence boundary for any key claim when present

Missing artifact dossier index is acceptable — the recall output must not depend on it. When absent, derive doc references from raw entry fields alone.

Absorbed Intent-Artifact Flagging

The old standalone intent-sync behavior is now a lightweight recall section. When recent raw entries include sync_suggestions, or mention intent artifacts and contract-like terms such as design, plan, architecture, prompt, schema, contract, migration, or config, include a "Potentially stale intent artifacts" section.

This section is read-only. Its job is to tell the next session what to inspect, not to decide that a document is stale and not to modify the document.