housekeep-gates — One required check, defined in code

Degree of freedom: MIXED — T1 is the priority. Mapping and winner confirmation [HIGH freedom]; aggregator needs: + skip-fail, loser deletion, branch-protection, and Phase 4 probes [LOW freedom — run exactly]. Net enforcement strictly ≥ before.

Apply-now. audit-gate-logic mapped the sprawl and named a winner per duplicate cluster; this makes the repo match the map. Target state: one required check in branch protection, backed by an aggregator job that needs: every real gate — so "what blocks merge" has exactly one answer, in one file.

Every retirement is proven safe before deletion. Never weaken enforcement while consolidating. Net enforcement strictly ≥ before.

This is the execution arm of audit-gate-logic, the same way housekeep-design executes plan-uiux-unification.

This skill vs neighbors

How to reason

1. Observe — archaeology map: cluster, winner, loser, current required checks
2. Interpret — would deleting this loser drop unique coverage?
3. Classify — port-then-delete / keep / not-yet-mapped
4. Severity — deleting the only server-side-enforced gate is a regression

Worked example

Observe: two lint jobs; old lint.yml is required; new ci.yml lint
is not. paths: skips .github/**.
Interpret: retiring lint.yml without porting + aggregator skip-fail
would let a workflow edit merge unlinted.
Classify: port unique rules, wire winner, delete loser; probe the skip path.
Probe: change matching the old skip filter → aggregator must go red, not skip-green.

Phase 0 — Load the map (or make a quick one) [HIGH freedom; confirm before edits]

Consume the archaeology map from audit-gate-logic (duplicate clusters, winners, losers, ratchet findings). If none exists, run its Phase 0 + 2.5 first — never consolidate gates you have not mapped. Deleting an "obvious duplicate" that was the only server-side-enforced one weakens the repo.

Confirm which winners stand before touching anything. Branch-protection changes always get explicit confirmation.

Phase 1 — Build the aggregator gate [LOW freedom — fail on failed or skipped]

Create (or adopt) the single-gate structure:

• One job — conventionally gate / all-green — that needs: every real

check (lint, typecheck, tests, build, and the audit jobs worth blocking on) and fails if any dependency failed or was skipped (if: always() + explicit result check). Skipped-counts-as-success is the classic aggregator bug.

• Make that job the only required status check; remove scattered

required entries. Enforcement moves from a settings list nobody audits to a needs: list that lives in code review.

• If a merge queue is (or will be) in use: add merge_group to the

workflow triggers and keep check names identical across pullrequest and mergegroup, or queued PRs wait on checks that never start.

• Keep one fast always-runs job as the visible status link if the

aggregator's needs: delays its appearance.

Phase 2 — Consolidate per the map [LOW freedom — delete losers, do not disable]

For each duplicate cluster, in this order:

1. Port unique value from losers into the winner (a lint rule only the

old config had, a test only the old workflow ran). Diff configs before deleting — retirement must not drop coverage.

1. Wire the winner into the aggregator's needs:.
2. Retire the losers — delete the workflow/config, do not

disable-and-keep. A disabled gate is comprehension debt and resurrection bait for the next agent session.

1. Extract shared logic into a reusable workflow or composite action

when the same steps exist in 2+ places.

Also restore hook/CI parity: local pre-commit / pre-push hooks run the same commands (ideally the same scripts) as CI's gate jobs — one definition, two callers — so "passes locally" predicts "passes CI" and nobody learns --no-verify.

Phase 3 — Normalize the ratchets [HIGH freedom]

• One baseline per metric. Competing thresholds (jest + codecov + a

committed floor) collapse to one enforcement point; the rest read from it or die.

• Auto-tighten upward. Floors track reality (threshold rises as the

metric improves, small flake tolerance) instead of sitting far below actual.

• Resets are reviewed, separate acts. Baseline regeneration happens in

its own PR with the diff visible. CI should fail if a baseline file changes in the same PR as a metric regression, where the tooling allows expressing that.

• No silent exemption growth. Ignore-lists and inline-disable counts

become ratcheted metrics themselves where feasible.

Phase 4 — Prove it [LOW freedom — run both probes]

• Deliberate-violation probe on a scratch branch: one violation per

consolidated gate class (lint error, failing test, coverage drop, baseline edit bundled with a regression). Confirm the aggregator goes red and the PR is unmergeable. A consolidation is not done until each retired loser's job is demonstrably covered by the winner.

• Skip-path probe: push a change matching any paths: filter that

previously skipped gates; confirm the aggregator still reports (skipped-as-success is the failure mode to disprove).

• Run a workflow-green-repo-style full pass to confirm the repo is green

under the new single gate.

Definition of Done

• Archaeology map confirmed with the user before edits
• Aggregator job exists, fails on any failed or skipped dependency, and is the only required check
• merge_group parity in place if a merge queue is used
• Every cluster: unique value ported, winner wired, losers deleted (not disabled)
• Shared steps extracted to one reusable definition; hooks and CI call the same commands
• One baseline per metric; ratchets auto-tighten; resets require a separate reviewed PR; exemption lists cannot silently grow
• Deliberate-violation + skip-path probes red as expected; repo green under the new gate
• Net enforcement strictly ≥ before

Self-critique before claiming done [LOW freedom — do not skip]

1. Map confirmed — no "obvious duplicate" deleted unmapped
2. Skipped ≠ success — aggregator checks dependency results
3. Losers deleted — not disabled
4. Probes red — violation + skip-path
5. Branch protection — only after explicit confirmation

Output format

1. Before/after map — old gates → new structure (aggregator + needs list)
2. Per-cluster log — winner | value ported from losers | losers deleted
3. Ratchet policy — metric | enforcement point | floor behavior | reset rule
4. Probe evidence — violation | gate response | pass/fail

Applied phase-by-phase. Pause for approval between phases when blast radius is large. Branch-protection changes always get explicit confirmation.