Franchise Feasibility

Core Variables

This skill is parameterized. Identify these before execution:

Required Inputs

• Business: Description, current operations, revenue model, unit economics.
• Current Distribution: How the product/service is delivered today.
• Market Position: Current footprint, revenue, growth rate.
• Expansion Ambition: Geographic/segment targets and timeline.

Execution Steps

1. Distribution Model Comparison

Evaluate models side-by-side, weighted by {business_model}:

Business-model-specific weighting:

• SaaS: Weight brand control lower (product is the brand), weight data control and

platform architecture higher.

• Physical retail: Weight location control, supply chain, and physical standards higher.
• Service: Weight talent quality, service delivery consistency, and training higher.
• Hybrid: Apply weights from both applicable models.

2. Franchise Viability Tests

Four universal tests, with {business_model}-specific criteria:

Replicability Test

• Can the core value delivery be standardized into teachable processes?
• Can a non-founder operator achieve 80%+ of founder-led quality?
• Has the model been proven in at least 2-3 company-owned units/instances?
• SaaS: Can sales, implementation, and L1 support be playbooked?
• Retail: Can food/product quality be maintained through SOPs?
• Service: Can service delivery be consistent across operators?

Economics Test

• Does the unit P&L support both franchisee profit AND franchisor royalty?
• Franchisee cash-on-cash return > 20% by Year 3?
• Franchisee breakeven within 12-18 months?
• Franchisor reaches system-level profitability within 3-5 years?
• SaaS: Does per-territory MRR/ARR sustain after royalty?
• Retail: Does ticket average × traffic support rent + COGS + royalty?
• Service: Do billable hours support staff costs + royalty?

Value-Add Test

• Does local franchise presence genuinely improve outcomes vs. centralized delivery?
• Do customers in the {product_type} sector prefer local relationships?
• Does the sector's buying process favor local operators?
• Is there a defensible local knowledge advantage (regulations, relationships, culture)?

Control Test

• Can the franchisor enforce quality standards at scale?
• Can brand integrity be maintained across independent operators?
• Are termination and non-compete provisions enforceable in target jurisdictions?
• SaaS: Can platform access and data be controlled technically?
• Retail: Can supply chain and ingredient/product sourcing be controlled?
• Service: Can service protocols and outcomes be audited?

3. Sector-Specific Franchise Considerations

Address factors unique to {product_type}:

4. Recommendation Framework

Score each model (1-5) with weights adjusted for {business_model}:

Output Template

## Franchise Feasibility: [Business Name]

### Engagement Parameters
| Variable | Value |
|---|---|
| Business Model | {business_model} |
| Product Type | {product_type} |
| Revenue Model | {revenue_model} |
| Territory Scope | {territory_scope} |

### Executive Summary
[1-paragraph recommendation with confidence level]

### Model Comparison
[Completed comparison table with rationale per cell]

### Viability Test Results
| Test | Pass/Fail | Evidence | Risk if Fail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Replicability | | | |
| Economics | | | |
| Value-Add | | | |
| Control | | | |

### Recommended Model: [Model]
[Rationale, key assumptions, implementation timeline]

### Key Risks
[Top 3-5 risks with mitigation strategies]

### Next Steps
[Phased action plan: 30/60/90 days]

Quality Checks

• All 4 viability tests explicitly assessed with evidence.
• Sector-specific factors addressed (not generic analysis).
• Financial projections use {revenue_model}-appropriate metrics.
• Recommendation is singular with stated confidence level.
• Comparison considers at least 3 distribution models.