SKILL.md
Codemap Config Setup
Goal
Write or improve .codemap/config.json so future Codemap calls stay focused on the code that matters for this repo.
Use this when
.codemap/config.jsonis missing- The existing config looks like a bare bootstrap instead of a real project policy
- Codemap output is dominated by assets, fixtures, generated files, vendor trees, PDFs, screenshots, models, or training data
- The project stack is obvious, but Codemap is not prioritizing the right parts of the repo
Workflow
- Inspect the repo quickly before writing config
- Run codemap . - If needed, run codemap --deps . - Note the stack markers (Cargo.toml, Package.swift, *.xcodeproj, go.mod, package.json, pyproject.toml, etc.) - Identify large non-code directories and noisy extensions
- Decide whether config is missing, boilerplate, or tuned
- Missing: no .codemap/config.json - Boilerplate: only generic only values, no real shaping, no excludes despite obvious noise - Tuned: contains intentional project-specific includes/excludes, depth, or routing hints
- Write a conservative code-first config
- Keep primary source-language only values when they help - Add exclude entries for obvious non-code noise - Set a moderate depth when the repo is broad - Avoid overfitting or excluding real source directories
- Prefer stack-aware defaults
- Rust: focus src, tests, benches, examples; de-prioritize corpora, sample PDFs, training data, large generated artifacts - iOS/Swift: focus app/framework source, tests, package/project manifests; de-prioritize .xcassets, screenshots, snapshots, vendor/build outputs - TS/JS: focus src, apps, packages, tests; de-prioritize dist, coverage, Storybook assets, large fixture payloads - Python: focus package roots, tests, tool config; de-prioritize notebooks, data dumps, models, fixtures when they overwhelm code - Go: focus packages, cmd, internal, tests; de-prioritize generated assets, sample data, vendor-like noise
- Preserve user intent
- If config already looks curated, do not replace it wholesale - Make minimal edits and explain why
- Verify immediately
- Rerun codemap . - If the repo still looks noisy, refine exclude and possibly depth - Only rerun codemap --deps . after tree output looks reasonable