Review code and architectures against the OWASP Top 10:2025 — the ten most critical web application security risks. Use when: (1) reviewing code for security vulnerabilities, (2) auditing a feature or codebase against OWASP categories, (3) providing remediation guidance for identified vulnerabilities, (4) writing new code and needing secure coding patterns. Triggers: 'review for security', 'OWASP audit', 'check for vulnerabilities','security checklist', 'is this code secure', 'security review',…
Review code and architectures against the OWASP Top 10:2025 — the ten most critical web application security risks.
Use when: (1) reviewing code for security vulnerabilities, (2) auditing a feature or codebase against OWASP categories, (3) providing remediation guidance for identified vulnerabilities, (4) writing new code and needing secure coding patterns.
Triggers: 'review for security', 'OWASP audit', 'check for vulnerabilities','security checklist', 'is this code secure', 'security review', 'fix vulnerability'.
Similar popular skills
Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.
Missing audit logs, no alerting, log injection, sensitive data in logs
3.91%
A10
Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions
Failing open, info leakage via errors, unchecked return values
2.95%
Severity classification
Use these severity levels when reporting findings:
Critical: Directly exploitable, leads to full system compromise or mass data breach (e.g., SQLi with no parameterization, hardcoded admin credentials, missing auth on admin endpoints).
High: Exploitable with moderate effort, significant data exposure or privilege escalation (e.g., IDOR, weak password hashing, SSRF, deserialization of untrusted data).
Medium: Exploitable under specific conditions, limited impact (e.g., missing CSRF protection, verbose error messages, missing security headers).