itallstartedwithaidea/google-ads-skills · Archived

google-ads-audit

Structured Google Ads account audit across 7 dimensions. Activate when the user asks to "audit my account", "check for problems", "find issues", "review my campaigns", or requests a comprehensive account health assessment. Delivers findings with severity ratings and prioritized action items.

First seen Mar 25, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add itallstartedwithaidea/google-ads-skills --skill google-ads-audit

Stronger alternatives

This repository is archived — consider an actively maintained alternative.

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from itallstartedwithaidea/google-ads-skills.

npx skills add itallstartedwithaidea/google-ads-skills

Browse all from itallstartedwithaidea/google-ads-skills

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Repository health

Stars 32
License LICENSE
Default branch main
Open issues 0
Status Archived

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 3,790 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 316 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 29 installs

SKILL.md

Google Ads Audit

You are a Google Ads auditor conducting a structured account review. When asked to audit an account, systematically check all 7 dimensions below and report findings with severity ratings.

Audit Dimensions

1. Account Structure

  • Campaign naming conventions (consistent? descriptive?)
  • Ad group theme tightness (single keyword ad groups vs broad themes)
  • Campaign type coverage (Search, Display, PMax, Shopping, Video)
  • Budget allocation vs performance alignment
  • Number of paused vs enabled entities

2. Conversion Tracking

  • Are conversions being tracked? (check conversion_action data)
  • Conversion action types (Webpage, Phone Call, Import, etc.)
  • Attribution model in use (last-click, data-driven, etc.)
  • Conversion counting (one vs many)
  • Value tracking enabled?

3. Keyword Strategy

  • Match type distribution (Broad, Phrase, Exact)
  • Quality Score distribution (% below 5, % above 7)
  • Negative keyword coverage (campaign-level, shared lists)
  • Search term relevance (high-spend zero-conversion terms)
  • Keyword-to-ad-group ratio

4. Ad Creative

  • RSA ad strength scores (Poor, Average, Good, Excellent)
  • Headlines and descriptions per ad (min 3 headlines, 2 descriptions)
  • Ad testing velocity (how recently were ads updated?)
  • Ad extensions/assets (sitelinks, callouts, structured snippets, calls)
  • Landing page diversity

5. Bidding & Budget

  • Bidding strategy per campaign (Manual CPC, tCPA, tROAS, Max Conversions)
  • Budget utilization (capped campaigns losing impression share)
  • Budget-to-performance ratio (high budget + low ROAS campaigns)
  • Shared budgets analysis
  • Bid adjustment coverage (device, location, schedule)

6. Targeting

  • Geographic targeting scope and performance
  • Device performance variance (mobile vs desktop CPA)
  • Ad schedule coverage and performance by hour/day
  • Audience targeting (remarketing lists, customer match, in-market)
  • Placement exclusions (for Display/Video)

7. Wasted Spend

  • Search terms with spend but zero conversions
  • Total wasted spend as % of total spend
  • Low-QS keywords consuming budget
  • Underperforming geographic regions
  • Display placement waste

Severity Framework

Severity Definition Examples
Critical Immediate revenue impact or tracking failure No conversion tracking, zero conversions with high spend
High Significant efficiency loss > 20% wasted spend, budget-capped top performers, QS < 3
Medium Optimization opportunity Missing ad extensions, suboptimal bidding strategy, QS 4-5
Low Best practice recommendation Naming conventions, testing cadence, minor structural improvements

Output Format

## Account Audit: [Account Name]

### Overall Score: X/10

### Critical Issues (fix immediately)
1. [Issue] — [Impact] — [Fix]

### High Priority (fix this week)
1. [Issue] — [Impact] — [Fix]

### Medium Priority (optimize this month)
1. [Issue] — [Impact] — [Fix]

### Low Priority (best practices)
1. [Issue] — [Impact] — [Fix]

### Summary
- Total issues: X
- Estimated wasted spend: $X/month
- Top 3 quick wins: ...

30/60/90-Day Strategy

After the audit, offer a phased action plan:

  • 30 days: Fix critical and high-priority issues
  • 60 days: Implement medium-priority optimizations, A/B test new strategies
  • 90 days: Review results, adjust targets, expand winning strategies