UX Researcher & Designer
Generate user personas from research data, create journey maps, plan usability tests, and synthesize research findings into actionable design recommendations.
Table of Contents
- [Trigger Terms](#trigger-terms)
- [Workflows](#workflows)
- [Workflow 1: Generate User Persona](#workflow-1-generate-user-persona) - [Workflow 2: Create Journey Map](#workflow-2-create-journey-map) - [Workflow 3: Plan Usability Test](#workflow-3-plan-usability-test) - [Workflow 4: Synthesize Research](#workflow-4-synthesize-research)
- [Tool Reference](#tool-reference)
- [Quick Reference Tables](#quick-reference-tables)
- [Knowledge Base](#knowledge-base)
Trigger Terms
Use this skill when you need to:
- "create user persona"
- "generate persona from data"
- "build customer journey map"
- "map user journey"
- "plan usability test"
- "design usability study"
- "analyze user research"
- "synthesize interview findings"
- "identify user pain points"
- "define user archetypes"
- "calculate research sample size"
- "create empathy map"
- "identify user needs"
Workflows
Workflow 1: Generate User Persona
Situation: You have user data (analytics, surveys, interviews) and need to create a research-backed persona.
Steps:
- Prepare user data
Required format (JSON): ``json [ { "userid": "user1", "age": 32, "usagefrequency": "daily", "featuresused": ["dashboard", "reports", "export"], "primarydevice": "desktop", "usagecontext": "work", "techproficiency": 7, "painpoints": ["slow loading", "confusing UI"] } ] ``
- Run persona generator
```bash # Human-readable output python scripts/persona_generator.py
# JSON output for integration python scripts/persona_generator.py json ```
- Review generated components
| Component |
What to Check |
| Archetype |
Does it match the data patterns? |
| Demographics |
Are they derived from actual data? |
| Goals |
Are they specific and actionable? |
| Frustrations |
Do they include frequency counts? |
| Design implications |
Can designers act on these? |
- Validate persona
- Show to 3-5 real users: "Does this sound like you?" - Cross-check with support tickets - Verify against analytics data
- Reference: See
references/persona-methodology.md for validity criteria
Workflow 2: Create Journey Map
Situation: You need to visualize the end-to-end user experience for a specific goal.
Steps:
- Define scope
| Element |
Description |
| Persona |
Which user type |
| Goal |
What they're trying to achieve |
| Start |
Trigger that begins journey |
| End |
Success criteria |
| Timeframe |
Hours/days/weeks |
- Gather journey data
Sources: - User interviews (ask "walk me through...") - Session recordings - Analytics (funnel, drop-offs) - Support tickets
- Map the stages
Typical B2B SaaS stages: `` Awareness → Evaluation → Onboarding → Adoption → Advocacy ``
- Fill in layers for each stage
`` Stage: [Name] ├── Actions: What does user do? ├── Touchpoints: Where do they interact? ├── Emotions: How do they feel? (1-5) ├── Pain Points: What frustrates them? └── Opportunities: Where can we improve? ``
- Identify opportunities
Priority Score = Frequency × Severity × Solvability
- Reference: See
references/journey-mapping-guide.md for templates
Workflow 3: Plan Usability Test
Situation: You need to validate a design with real users.
Steps:
- Define research questions
Transform vague goals into testable questions:
| Vague |
Testable |
| "Is it easy to use?" |
"Can users complete checkout in <3 min?" |
| "Do users like it?" |
"Will users choose Design A or B?" |
| "Does it make sense?" |
"Can users find settings without hints?" |
- Select method
| Method |
Participants |
Duration |
Best For |
| Moderated remote |
5-8 |
45-60 min |
Deep insights |
| Unmoderated remote |
10-20 |
15-20 min |
Quick validation |
| Guerrilla |
3-5 |
5-10 min |
Rapid feedback |
- Design tasks
Good task format: `` SCENARIO: "Imagine you're planning a trip to Paris..." GOAL: "Book a hotel for 3 nights in your budget." SUCCESS: "You see the confirmation page." ``
Task progression: Warm-up → Core → Secondary → Edge case → Free exploration
- Define success metrics
| Metric |
Target |
| Completion rate |
>80% |
| Time on task |
<2× expected |
| Error rate |
<15% |
| Satisfaction |
>4/5 |
- Prepare moderator guide
- Think-aloud instructions - Non-leading prompts - Post-task questions
- Reference: See
references/usability-testing-frameworks.md for full guide
Workflow 4: Synthesize Research
Situation: You have raw research data (interviews, surveys, observations) and need actionable insights.
Steps:
- Code the data
Tag each data point: - [GOAL] - What they want to achieve - [PAIN] - What frustrates them - [BEHAVIOR] - What they actually do - [CONTEXT] - When/where they use product - [QUOTE] - Direct user words
- Cluster similar patterns
``` User A: Uses daily, advanced features, shortcuts User B: Uses daily, complex workflows, automation User C: Uses weekly, basic needs, occasional
Cluster 1: A, B (Power Users) Cluster 2: C (Casual User) ```
- Calculate segment sizes
| Cluster |
Users |
% |
Viability |
| Power Users |
18 |
36% |
Primary persona |
| Business Users |
15 |
30% |
Primary persona |
| Casual Users |
12 |
24% |
Secondary persona |
- Extract key findings
For each theme: - Finding statement - Supporting evidence (quotes, data) - Frequency (X/Y participants) - Business impact - Recommendation
- Prioritize opportunities
| Factor |
Score 1-5 |
| Frequency |
How often does this occur? |
| Severity |
How much does it hurt? |
| Breadth |
How many users affected? |
| Solvability |
Can we fix this? |
- Reference: See
references/persona-methodology.md for analysis framework
Tool Reference
persona_generator.py
Generates data-driven personas from user research data.
| Argument |
Values |
Default |
Description |
| format |
(none), json |
(none) |
Output format |
Sample Output:
============================================================
PERSONA: Alex the Power User
============================================================
📝 A daily user who primarily uses the product for work purposes
Archetype: Power User
Quote: "I need tools that can keep up with my workflow"
👤 Demographics:
• Age Range: 25-34
• Location Type: Urban
• Tech Proficiency: Advanced
🎯 Goals & Needs:
• Complete tasks efficiently
• Automate workflows
• Access advanced features
😤 Frustrations:
• Slow loading times (14/20 users)
• No keyboard shortcuts
• Limited API access
💡 Design Implications:
→ Optimize for speed and efficiency
→ Provide keyboard shortcuts and power features
→ Expose API and automation capabilities
📈 Data: Based on 45 users
Confidence: High
Archetypes Generated:
| Archetype |
Signals |
Design Focus |
| power_user |
Daily use, 10+ features |
Efficiency, customization |
| casual_user |
Weekly use, 3-5 features |
Simplicity, guidance |
| business_user |
Work context, team use |
Collaboration, reporting |
| mobile_first |
Mobile primary |
Touch, offline, speed |
Output Components:
| Component |
Description |
| demographics |
Age range, location, occupation, tech level |
| psychographics |
Motivations, values, attitudes, lifestyle |
| behaviors |
Usage patterns, feature preferences |
| needsandgoals |
Primary, secondary, functional, emotional |
| frustrations |
Pain points with evidence |
| scenarios |
Contextual usage stories |
| design_implications |
Actionable recommendations |
| data_points |
Sample size, confidence level |
Quick Reference Tables
Research Method Selection
| Question Type |
Best Method |
Sample Size |
| "What do users do?" |
Analytics, observation |
100+ events |
| "Why do they do it?" |
Interviews |
8-15 users |
| "How well can they do it?" |
Usability test |
5-8 users |
| "What do they prefer?" |
Survey, A/B test |
50+ users |
| "What do they feel?" |
Diary study, interviews |
10-15 users |
Persona Confidence Levels
| Sample Size |
Confidence |
Use Case |
| 5-10 users |
Low |
Exploratory |
| 11-30 users |
Medium |
Directional |
| 31+ users |
High |
Production |
Usability Issue Severity
| Severity |
Definition |
Action |
| 4 - Critical |
Prevents task completion |
Fix immediately |
| 3 - Major |
Significant difficulty |
Fix before release |
| 2 - Minor |
Causes hesitation |
Fix when possible |
| 1 - Cosmetic |
Noticed but not problematic |
Low priority |
Interview Question Types
| Type |
Example |
Use For |
| Context |
"Walk me through your typical day" |
Understanding environment |
| Behavior |
"Show me how you do X" |
Observing actual actions |
| Goals |
"What are you trying to achieve?" |
Uncovering motivations |
| Pain |
"What's the hardest part?" |
Identifying frustrations |
| Reflection |
"What would you change?" |
Generating ideas |
Knowledge Base
Detailed reference guides in references/:
| File |
Content |
persona-methodology.md |
Validity criteria, data collection, analysis framework |
journey-mapping-guide.md |
Mapping process, templates, opportunity identification |
example-personas.md |
3 complete persona examples with data |
usability-testing-frameworks.md |
Test planning, task design, analysis |
Validation Checklist
Persona Quality
Journey Map Quality
Usability Test Quality
Research Synthesis Quality
Related Skills
- UI Design System (
product-team/ui-design-system/) — Research findings inform design system decisions
- Product Manager Toolkit (
product-team/product-manager-toolkit/) — Customer interview analysis complements persona research