Senior Architect
Architecture design and analysis tools for making informed technical decisions.
Table of Contents
- [Quick Start](#quick-start)
- [Tools Overview](#tools-overview)
- [Architecture Diagram Generator](#1-architecture-diagram-generator) - [Dependency Analyzer](#2-dependency-analyzer) - [Project Architect](#3-project-architect)
- [Decision Workflows](#decision-workflows)
- [Database Selection](#database-selection-workflow) - [Architecture Pattern Selection](#architecture-pattern-selection-workflow) - [Monolith vs Microservices](#monolith-vs-microservices-decision)
- [Reference Documentation](#reference-documentation)
- [Tech Stack Coverage](#tech-stack-coverage)
- [Common Commands](#common-commands)
Quick Start
# Generate architecture diagram from project
python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py ./my-project --format mermaid
# Analyze dependencies for issues
python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py ./my-project --output json
# Get architecture assessment
python scripts/project_architect.py ./my-project --verbose
Tools Overview
1. Architecture Diagram Generator
Generates architecture diagrams from project structure in multiple formats.
Solves: "I need to visualize my system architecture for documentation or team discussion"
Input: Project directory path Output: Diagram code (Mermaid, PlantUML, or ASCII)
Supported diagram types:
component - Shows modules and their relationships
layer - Shows architectural layers (presentation, business, data)
deployment - Shows deployment topology
Usage:
# Mermaid format (default)
python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py ./project --format mermaid --type component
# PlantUML format
python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py ./project --format plantuml --type layer
# ASCII format (terminal-friendly)
python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py ./project --format ascii
# Save to file
python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py ./project -o architecture.md
Example output (Mermaid):
graph TD
A[API Gateway] --> B[Auth Service]
A --> C[User Service]
B --> D[(PostgreSQL)]
C --> D
2. Dependency Analyzer
Analyzes project dependencies for coupling, circular dependencies, and outdated packages.
Solves: "I need to understand my dependency tree and identify potential issues"
Input: Project directory path Output: Analysis report (JSON or human-readable)
Analyzes:
- Dependency tree (direct and transitive)
- Circular dependencies between modules
- Coupling score (0-100)
- Outdated packages
Supported package managers:
- npm/yarn (
package.json)
- Python (
requirements.txt, pyproject.toml)
- Go (
go.mod)
- Rust (
Cargo.toml)
Usage:
# Human-readable report
python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py ./project
# JSON output for CI/CD integration
python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py ./project --output json
# Check only for circular dependencies
python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py ./project --check circular
# Verbose mode with recommendations
python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py ./project --verbose
Example output:
Dependency Analysis Report
==========================
Total dependencies: 47 (32 direct, 15 transitive)
Coupling score: 72/100 (moderate)
Issues found:
- CIRCULAR: auth → user → permissions → auth
- OUTDATED: lodash 4.17.15 → 4.17.21 (security)
Recommendations:
1. Extract shared interface to break circular dependency
2. Update lodash to fix CVE-2020-8203
3. Project Architect
Analyzes project structure and detects architectural patterns, code smells, and improvement opportunities.
Solves: "I want to understand the current architecture and identify areas for improvement"
Input: Project directory path Output: Architecture assessment report
Detects:
- Architectural patterns (MVC, layered, hexagonal, microservices indicators)
- Code organization issues (god classes, mixed concerns)
- Layer violations
- Missing architectural components
Usage:
# Full assessment
python scripts/project_architect.py ./project
# Verbose with detailed recommendations
python scripts/project_architect.py ./project --verbose
# JSON output
python scripts/project_architect.py ./project --output json
# Check specific aspect
python scripts/project_architect.py ./project --check layers
Example output:
Architecture Assessment
=======================
Detected pattern: Layered Architecture (confidence: 85%)
Structure analysis:
✓ controllers/ - Presentation layer detected
✓ services/ - Business logic layer detected
✓ repositories/ - Data access layer detected
⚠ models/ - Mixed domain and DTOs
Issues:
- LARGE FILE: UserService.ts (1,847 lines) - consider splitting
- MIXED CONCERNS: PaymentController contains business logic
Recommendations:
1. Split UserService into focused services
2. Move business logic from controllers to services
3. Separate domain models from DTOs
Decision Workflows
Database Selection Workflow
Use when choosing a database for a new project or migrating existing data.
Step 1: Identify data characteristics
| Characteristic |
Points to SQL |
Points to NoSQL |
| Structured with relationships |
✓ |
|
| ACID transactions required |
✓ |
|
| Flexible/evolving schema |
|
✓ |
| Document-oriented data |
|
✓ |
| Time-series data |
|
✓ (specialized) |
Step 2: Evaluate scale requirements
- <1M records, single region → PostgreSQL or MySQL
- 1M-100M records, read-heavy → PostgreSQL with read replicas
- >100M records, global distribution → CockroachDB, Spanner, or DynamoDB
- High write throughput (>10K/sec) → Cassandra or ScyllaDB
Step 3: Check consistency requirements
- Strong consistency required → SQL or CockroachDB
- Eventual consistency acceptable → DynamoDB, Cassandra, MongoDB
Step 4: Document decision Create an ADR (Architecture Decision Record) with:
- Context and requirements
- Options considered
- Decision and rationale
- Trade-offs accepted
Quick reference:
PostgreSQL → Default choice for most applications
MongoDB → Document store, flexible schema
Redis → Caching, sessions, real-time features
DynamoDB → Serverless, auto-scaling, AWS-native
TimescaleDB → Time-series data with SQL interface
Architecture Pattern Selection Workflow
Use when designing a new system or refactoring existing architecture.
Step 1: Assess team and project size
| Team Size |
Recommended Starting Point |
| 1-3 developers |
Modular monolith |
| 4-10 developers |
Modular monolith or service-oriented |
| 10+ developers |
Consider microservices |
Step 2: Evaluate deployment requirements
- Single deployment unit acceptable → Monolith
- Independent scaling needed → Microservices
- Mixed (some services scale differently) → Hybrid
Step 3: Consider data boundaries
- Shared database acceptable → Monolith or modular monolith
- Strict data isolation required → Microservices with separate DBs
- Event-driven communication fits → Event-sourcing/CQRS
Step 4: Match pattern to requirements
| Requirement |
Recommended Pattern |
| Rapid MVP development |
Modular Monolith |
| Independent team deployment |
Microservices |
| Complex domain logic |
Domain-Driven Design |
| High read/write ratio difference |
CQRS |
| Audit trail required |
Event Sourcing |
| Third-party integrations |
Hexagonal/Ports & Adapters |
See references/architecture_patterns.md for detailed pattern descriptions.
Monolith vs Microservices Decision
Choose Monolith when:
Choose Microservices when:
Hybrid approach: Start with a modular monolith. Extract services only when:
- A module has significantly different scaling needs
- A team needs independent deployment
- Technology constraints require separation
Reference Documentation
Load these files for detailed information:
| File |
Contains |
Load when user asks about |
references/architecture_patterns.md |
9 architecture patterns with trade-offs, code examples, and when to use |
"which pattern?", "microservices vs monolith", "event-driven", "CQRS" |
references/systemdesignworkflows.md |
6 step-by-step workflows for system design tasks |
"how to design?", "capacity planning", "API design", "migration" |
references/techdecisionguide.md |
Decision matrices for technology choices |
"which database?", "which framework?", "which cloud?", "which cache?" |
Tech Stack Coverage
Languages: TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, Kotlin, Rust Frontend: React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, React Native, Flutter Backend: Node.js, Express, FastAPI, Go, GraphQL, REST Databases: PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, Redis, DynamoDB, Cassandra Infrastructure: Docker, Kubernetes, Terraform, AWS, GCP, Azure CI/CD: GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, CircleCI, Jenkins
Common Commands
# Architecture visualization
python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py . --format mermaid
python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py . --format plantuml
python scripts/architecture_diagram_generator.py . --format ascii
# Dependency analysis
python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py . --verbose
python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py . --check circular
python scripts/dependency_analyzer.py . --output json
# Architecture assessment
python scripts/project_architect.py . --verbose
python scripts/project_architect.py . --check layers
python scripts/project_architect.py . --output json
Getting Help
- Run any script with
--help for usage information
- Check reference documentation for detailed patterns and workflows
- Use
--verbose flag for detailed explanations and recommendations