iankiku/forwward-teams

meeting

(forwward) Turns transcripts, rough notes, or voice memos into a clean summary with decisions, action items (owner + deadline), and open questions.

First seen May 6, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add iankiku/forwward-teams --skill meeting

Summary

  • (forwward) Turns transcripts, rough notes, or voice memos into a clean summary with decisions, action items (owner + deadline), and open questions.
  • Use when the user pastes unstructured notes or asks "summarize this meeting", "meeting notes", "what were the action items", "write up from this call", "debrief", "what did we decide".
  • Works for any meeting type — standups, 1:1s, client calls, all-hands, retrospectives.

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from iankiku/forwward-teams · top by installs.

npx skills add iankiku/forwward-teams

Browse all from iankiku/forwward-teams

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Repository health

Stars 18
License LICENSE
Default branch main
Open issues 0
Status Active

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 4,511 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 435 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 17 installs

SKILL.md

Meeting

Core principle

A meeting summary is not a transcript. It's a decision log and a task list. The person reading it wasn't there — or was there but needs to act on it. Every line either records a decision, assigns work, or flags a risk. Nothing else earns a line.

Step 1: Understand what you have

Assess the input before writing anything:

  • Transcript (full dialogue): extract signal, ignore filler
  • Rough notes (bullets, shorthand, fragments): fill gaps with reasonable inference, flag anything uncertain
  • Voice memo / stream of consciousness: restructure entirely, don't preserve the rambling order

Ask if unclear: "Is this a transcript, notes, or raw thoughts?" Then proceed.

Step 2: Identify the meeting type

The output shape changes by type:

Type What matters most
Standup / sync Blockers, status, handoffs
1:1 Decisions made, commitments, feedback
Client call What was promised, open questions, next steps
Strategy / planning Decisions with rationale, rejected options, open threads
Retrospective What to change, who owns the change
All-hands / board Key messages, decisions, follow-ups

Step 3: Extract the four sections

Pull from the input in this priority order. If a section is empty, omit it.

Decisions

What was resolved. One line each. Past tense, specific.

- Approved Q3 hiring plan for 3 engineers and 1 designer.
- Agreed to delay the enterprise launch to September to hit the compliance milestone first.
- Dropped the white-label feature from v1 scope — revisit in Q4.

Action items

Who does what by when. Every item needs an owner. If no deadline was stated, leave it blank — don't invent one.

- [ ] @Sara — send revised contract to Acme by Friday
- [ ] @Jae — share onboarding doc draft with the team before next sync
- [ ] @Ian — follow up with legal on the data processing agreement (no deadline set)

Open questions

Unresolved issues that need a decision or more information before work can proceed.

- Do we need SOC 2 Type II before enterprise can sign? (Owner: legal — Ian to confirm)
- What's the pricing model for the agency tier? (Still open — needs finance input)

Summary

Two to four sentences. The current state, what changed, and what's next. Enough for someone who wasn't there to understand the outcome without reading the sections above.

Step 4: Apply format for the channel

Slack / async message: Summary paragraph first, then a short bulleted list of action items. No headers. Under 120 words. Link to the full doc if it exists.

Written doc / Notion / Confluence: Full four-section structure with headers. Include date, meeting type, and attendees at the top.

Email follow-up: Subject: [Meeting recap] <topic> — <date> Body: summary paragraph + action items table. Under 200 words.

Anti-patterns

Pattern Fix
Transcribing instead of summarizing Extract decisions and tasks, not dialogue
Action items without owners Every item gets a name, even if it's "TBD"
Vague decisions: "we discussed X" "We decided X" or "No decision reached on X"
Burying the decisions in narrative Decisions section always comes first
Fabricating deadlines If no deadline was stated, leave the field blank

What goes in vs. what stays out

In:

  • Explicit decisions and the reasoning given
  • Named commitments (who said they would do what)
  • Blockers and risks raised
  • Explicitly unresolved questions

Out:

  • Who said what (attribution, unless it matters for the decision)
  • Tangents that didn't produce a decision or task
  • Pleasantries, filler, "does that make sense?" moments
  • Speculation that wasn't agreed on

When NOT to use

  • Long-form project retrospective with root cause analysis → write a proper postmortem
  • Client-facing meeting report with narrative and relationship context → use /write for tone and structure
  • Board deck with financial detail → use /deck