getsentry/skills · Official
code-review
Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.
Installation
npx skills add getsentry/skills --skill code-review
Similar popular skills
Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.
Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, includ…
810.4K installsDebug Azure production issues on Azure using AppLens, Azure Monitor, resource health, and safe …
568.9K installsPre-deployment validation for Azure readiness. Run deep checks on configuration, infrastructure…
567.7K installsPostgres best practices maintained by Supabase, for Postgres running anywhere. Load this skill …
391.6K installsAdds interactive widget previews to the project using the previews.dart system. Use when creati…
29.4K installsFind Google Tasks that are past due and need attention.
27.2K installsAlso in this package
Other skills from getsentry/skills · top by installs.
npx skills add getsentry/skills
More details
Agent compatibility
Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.
Repository health
main
Package contents
Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.
-
skill md
SKILL.md2,768 B -
docs
SUMMARY.md234 B
History
- First seen on skills.sh
- First recorded snapshot · 4,700 installs
Videos
Tutorials, guides, and showcases specifically about this skill.
SKILL.md
Sentry Code Review
Follow these guidelines when reviewing code for Sentry projects.
Review Checklist
Identifying Problems
Look for these issues in code changes:
- Runtime errors: Potential exceptions, null pointer issues, out-of-bounds access
- Performance: Unbounded O(n²) operations, N+1 queries, unnecessary allocations
- Side effects: Unintended behavioral changes affecting other components
- Backwards compatibility: Breaking API changes without migration path
- ORM queries: Complex Django ORM with unexpected query performance
- Security vulnerabilities: Injection, XSS, access control gaps, secrets exposure
Design Assessment
- Do component interactions make logical sense?
- Does the change align with existing project architecture?
- Are there conflicts with current requirements or goals?
Test Coverage
Every PR should have appropriate test coverage:
- Functional tests for business logic
- Integration tests for component interactions
- End-to-end tests for critical user paths
Verify tests cover actual requirements and edge cases. Avoid excessive branching or looping in test code.
Long-Term Impact
Flag for senior engineer review when changes involve:
- Database schema modifications
- API contract changes
- New framework or library adoption
- Performance-critical code paths
- Security-sensitive functionality
Feedback Guidelines
Tone
- Be polite and empathetic
- Provide actionable suggestions, not vague criticism
- Phrase as questions when uncertain: "Have you considered...?"
Approval
- Approve when only minor issues remain
- Don't block PRs for stylistic preferences
- Remember: the goal is risk reduction, not perfect code
Common Patterns to Flag
Python/Django
# Bad: N+1 query
for user in users:
print(user.profile.name) # Separate query per user
# Good: Prefetch related
users = User.objects.prefetch_related('profile')
TypeScript/React
// Bad: Missing dependency in useEffect
useEffect(() => {
fetchData(userId);
}, []); // userId not in deps
// Good: Include all dependencies
useEffect(() => {
fetchData(userId);
}, [userId]);
Security
# Bad: SQL injection risk
cursor.execute(f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}")
# Good: Parameterized query
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = %s", [user_id])