getsentry/skills · Official

code-review

Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.

All-time #2961 Trending #5092 Hot #2639 First seen Jan 20, 2026
8-week activity · all time api

Installation

$ npx skills add getsentry/skills --skill code-review

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from getsentry/skills · top by installs.

npx skills add getsentry/skills

Browse all from getsentry/skills

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Repository health

Stars 986
License LICENSE
Default branch main
Open issues 5
Status Active

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 2,768 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 234 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 4,700 installs

Videos

Tutorials, guides, and showcases specifically about this skill.

SKILL.md

Sentry Code Review

Follow these guidelines when reviewing code for Sentry projects.

Review Checklist

Identifying Problems

Look for these issues in code changes:

  • Runtime errors: Potential exceptions, null pointer issues, out-of-bounds access
  • Performance: Unbounded O(n²) operations, N+1 queries, unnecessary allocations
  • Side effects: Unintended behavioral changes affecting other components
  • Backwards compatibility: Breaking API changes without migration path
  • ORM queries: Complex Django ORM with unexpected query performance
  • Security vulnerabilities: Injection, XSS, access control gaps, secrets exposure

Design Assessment

  • Do component interactions make logical sense?
  • Does the change align with existing project architecture?
  • Are there conflicts with current requirements or goals?

Test Coverage

Every PR should have appropriate test coverage:

  • Functional tests for business logic
  • Integration tests for component interactions
  • End-to-end tests for critical user paths

Verify tests cover actual requirements and edge cases. Avoid excessive branching or looping in test code.

Long-Term Impact

Flag for senior engineer review when changes involve:

  • Database schema modifications
  • API contract changes
  • New framework or library adoption
  • Performance-critical code paths
  • Security-sensitive functionality

Feedback Guidelines

Tone

  • Be polite and empathetic
  • Provide actionable suggestions, not vague criticism
  • Phrase as questions when uncertain: "Have you considered...?"

Approval

  • Approve when only minor issues remain
  • Don't block PRs for stylistic preferences
  • Remember: the goal is risk reduction, not perfect code

Common Patterns to Flag

Python/Django

# Bad: N+1 query
for user in users:
    print(user.profile.name)  # Separate query per user

# Good: Prefetch related
users = User.objects.prefetch_related('profile')

TypeScript/React

// Bad: Missing dependency in useEffect
useEffect(() => {
  fetchData(userId);
}, []);  // userId not in deps

// Good: Include all dependencies
useEffect(() => {
  fetchData(userId);
}, [userId]);

Security

# Bad: SQL injection risk
cursor.execute(f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}")

# Good: Parameterized query
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = %s", [user_id])

References