openspec-ff-change

Fast-forward through artifact creation - generate everything needed to start implementation in one go.

Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context, schemas, view). Once selected, treat --store <id> as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>", not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.

Input: The user's request should include a change name (kebab-case) OR a description of what they want to build.

Steps

1. If no clear input provided, ask what they want to build

Ask the user (open-ended, no preset options): > "What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."

From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" → add-user-auth).

IMPORTANT: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.

1. Create the change directory

``bash openspec new change "<name>" `` This creates a scaffolded change in the planning home resolved by the CLI.

1. Get the artifact build order

``bash openspec status --change "<name>" --json ` Parse the JSON to get: - applyRequires: array of artifact IDs needed before implementation (e.g., ["tasks"]) - artifacts: list of all artifacts, each with its status and its requires edges (the artifact IDs it directly depends on) - planningHome, changeRoot, artifactPaths, and actionContext`: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.

1. Create every artifact in the required set

Use a todo list to track progress through the artifacts.

Loop through artifacts in dependency order (artifacts with no pending dependencies first):

a. For each artifact that is ready (dependencies satisfied): - Get instructions: ``bash openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json ` - The instructions JSON includes: - context: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output) - rules: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output) - template: The structure to use for your output file - instruction: Schema-specific guidance for this artifact type - skipped/warning: present when the change declares skip_specs and this artifact must NOT be created - stop and pick another artifact - resolvedOutputPath: Resolved path or pattern to write the artifact - dependencies: Completed artifacts to read for context - Read any completed dependency files for context - always re-read them from disk, even if you saw them earlier in the conversation (the user may have edited them) - Inspect the relevant project before drafting: Read context and rules first, then inspect relevant implementation, nearby tests, configuration, and documentation outside openspec/. Keep inspection read-only and proportional to the change; reuse findings for later artifacts and inspect more only as needed. - Identify the target project from the request and project context; the planning home may be separate from the code. If the target is unclear, ask. For greenfield or non-code changes, inspect the available structure and relevant documents. If source is unavailable, state the limitation and ask when it materially affects the plan. - Ground scope, approach, and tasks in what you find. Distinguish observed behavior from assumptions and proposed additions; surface conflicts with existing specs instead of silently deciding which is correct. - Do this discovery now, rather than leaving generic "explore the codebase" or "make a plan" tasks for implementation. Keep any necessary follow-up investigation specific to an unresolved question. - If the instruction field delegates creation to a specific skill or command, invoke it to produce the artifact instead of writing the file yourself, then verify the artifact file exists at resolvedOutputPath - Otherwise create the artifact file using template as the structure and write it to resolvedOutputPath. If resolvedOutputPath is a glob, follow instruction to choose the concrete file path - Apply context and rules` as constraints - but do NOT copy them into the file - Show brief progress: "✓ Created <artifact-id>"

b. Continue until every artifact in the required set exists (not just apply.requires) - After creating each artifact, re-run openspec status --change "<name>" --json - The required set is applyRequires plus every artifact reachable from those by following the requires edges in status --json - walk them transitively (spec-driven closes over proposal, specs, design, tasks). Leave artifacts outside that set alone - status is file-existence only, so an applyRequires artifact reading done does NOT mean its dependencies exist - writing tasks.md early marks tasks done while specs was never written. Use each artifact's requires edges, not its status, to build the required set: a done artifact still lists what it depends on - An artifact already reading status: "skipped" is satisfied: the change declares skip_specs in .openspec.yaml, so its files must NOT exist. Never try to create one - Create every artifact in the required set that is missing, then re-check - creating one can unblock others - Skip one only when status already reports it skipped, or when its own instruction says it is conditional: run openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json and skip only if its instruction field marks it optional (e.g. "create only if..."). Spec-driven's design.md qualifies; specs qualifies only via the skipped status above, never by your own judgment. Tell the user, and do not reconsider it - Dependencies are enablers, not gates: if a required artifact is still blocked only because you skipped a conditional dependency, write it anyway - Stop when every artifact in the required set is done, skipped, or was deliberately skipped

c. If an artifact requires user input (unclear context): - Ask the user to clarify - Then continue with creation

1. Show final status

``bash openspec status --change "<name>" ``

Output

After completing all artifacts, summarize:

• Change name and location
• List of artifacts created with brief descriptions, plus any conditional artifact you skipped and why
• What's ready: "All artifacts needed for implementation are ready."
• Prompt: "Run /openspec-apply-change or ask me to implement to start working on the tasks."

Artifact Creation Guidelines

• Follow the instruction field from openspec instructions for each artifact type - it is the authoritative guidance, even for familiar artifact names
• If the instruction field directs you to use a specific skill or command to create the artifact, invoke it instead of writing the artifact directly
• The schema defines what each artifact should contain - follow it
• Read dependency artifacts for context before creating new ones
• Use template as the structure for your output file - fill in its sections
• IMPORTANT: context and rules are constraints for YOU, not content for the file

- Do NOT copy <context>, <rules>, <project_context> blocks into the artifact - These guide what you write, but should never appear in the output

Guardrails

• Create every artifact the apply phase transitively depends on, not just the ids listed in apply.requires
• Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one - re-read from disk, not from conversation memory (files may have changed since you last saw them)
• If context is critically unclear, ask the user - but prefer making reasonable decisions to keep momentum
• If a change with that name already exists, suggest continuing that change instead
• Verify each artifact file exists after writing before proceeding to next