fallow-rs/fallow · Archived

panel-review

Review a Fallow design, plan, workflow, CLI surface, documentation architecture, or user experience with representative end-user and domain-expert perspectives before implementation.

First seen Aug 8, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add fallow-rs/fallow --skill panel-review

Stronger alternatives

This repository is archived — consider an actively maintained alternative.

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from fallow-rs/fallow · top by installs.

npx skills add fallow-rs/fallow

Browse all from fallow-rs/fallow

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Repository health

Stars 4.4K
License LICENSE
Default branch main
Open issues 7
Status Archived

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 1,057 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 202 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 4 installs

SKILL.md

<!-- Generated from .agents/skills. Do not edit. -->

Panel review

  1. Read the controlling plan or specification first.
  2. Build one evidence package from current source, live behavior, and relevant

public contracts.

  1. Select representative users plus specialists for accessibility, security,

privacy, compatibility, operations, or agent runtimes as applicable.

  1. Ask reviewers for concrete blockers, concerns, follow-ups, and no-action

decisions.

  1. Verify load-bearing claims against source before accepting them.
  2. Synthesize consensus under:

- Fix before change - Fix now - Follow-up - No action

  1. Record approved decisions in the active .plans/<task>.md.

Do not expose private source text or internal review labels in public output. Panel feedback is evidence, not authority over tested contracts.