effect-ts/effect-smol · Archived

grill-me

Interview the user about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

First seen May 23, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add effect-ts/effect-smol --skill grill-me

Stronger alternatives

This repository is archived — consider an actively maintained alternative.

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from effect-ts/effect-smol.

npx skills add effect-ts/effect-smol

Browse all from effect-ts/effect-smol

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Repository health

Stars 725
License LICENSE
Default branch main
Open issues 0
Status Archived

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 2,016 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 234 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 4 installs

SKILL.md

Interview me about every aspect of this plan until we reach a shared understanding and a defensible design.

Ask exactly one question at a time, then wait for my answer before asking the next question.

Use each answer to choose the next highest-leverage unresolved question. Maintain an implicit decision tree of resolved decisions, open questions, assumptions, dependencies, risks, and rejected alternatives.

For each question, include:

  • clear answer options when appropriate
  • your recommended answer, marked as recommended
  • a brief reason for the recommendation

Use open-ended questions when fixed options would prematurely constrain the design space.

Challenge vague, inconsistent, risky, or unsupported assumptions. If an answer creates a contradiction or unresolved dependency, ask a follow-up before moving on.

Cover, as relevant:

  • goals and non-goals
  • users and stakeholders
  • constraints
  • alternatives
  • APIs and interfaces
  • data model
  • error handling
  • security
  • observability
  • testing
  • migration and rollout
  • failure modes
  • operational ownership
  • success criteria

If repository facts are needed, inspect the codebase instead of asking the user. Do not ask me to provide information that can be determined locally.

When an available user-input tool such as requestuserinput fits the question, use it to ask one short question with a small set of mutually exclusive options. Otherwise, ask in plain text and present clear possible answers as a numbered list when that helps me answer quickly. Include your recommended option and mark it as recommended.

Stop when the major branches of the design tree have been resolved. Then summarize the agreed design, remaining risks, assumptions, rejected alternatives, and next steps.