start-workflow

Quick Summary

Goal: Detect user intent → auto-select direct/skill/standard/custom path → activate with full TaskCreate plan.

Workflow:

1. Detect — Execute explicit /workflow-* or /start-workflow <id> directly; otherwise match prompt against workflow catalog and skill list
2. Auto-select — Choose direct execution, a skill, a standard workflow, or a custom pipeline without asking the user to pick the path
3. Activate — Create ALL TaskCreate items for chosen sequence; materialize every declared parallelGroups group as a wave in those tasks; mark first in_progress

Key Rules:

• MUST ATTENTION define success criteria before execution and loop until observable verification passes.
• MUST ATTENTION when creating/reviewing specs or tests, name Business Intent / Invariant Guarded or the protected business intent/invariant and ensure the test would fail if that intent breaks.

• MUST ATTENTION auto-select the best execution path for ordinary prompts. Do not ask the user to choose between direct execution, skill, standard workflow, or custom workflow.
• Explicit /workflow-* or /start-workflow <id> invocation counts as the user choosing that workflow; execute it directly.
• Propose Custom Pipeline when no catalog workflow is a strong fit (>80% steps relevant = use catalog)
• workflows.json workflows field is an OBJECT — use workflows[workflowId], NEVER .find() or [index]
• Create ALL TaskCreate items BEFORE marking the first task in_progress — batch creation, then execute
• Read parallelGroups at activation and tag its member tasks as one wave — 1:1 tasks still stand (a group never collapses members into one task)
• No parallelGroups = sequence is the order — surface only adjacent read-only steps as a Candidate wave, NEVER a wave that contradicts sequence
• NEVER mark a task completed without invoking its Skill tool, except when the selected canonical preActions.injectContext explicitly authorizes an evidence-backed conditional skip — use in_progress → cited comment → completed; never delete the task
• ALWAYS check context for ## Workflow Catalog first (Tier 1). Tier 2 is mandatory before task creation only for workflow-big-feature, workflow-bugfix, and workflow-feature (to load their terminal refresh predicate), or when Tier 1 cannot supply required parallelGroups metadata — NEVER expose the full workflows.json to context
• If another workflow is active, it auto-switches (ends current, starts new) — no manual cleanup needed

NOT for: Manual step execution (follow TaskCreate items), workflow design (use plan), catalog management.

Related: /start-workflow <workflowId> | Catalog: host-specific static workflow-catalog surfaces derived from .claude/workflows.json (no router/tracker hooks)

Custom Pipeline Option

When the prompt doesn't cleanly match a single catalog workflow — or combining steps from multiple workflows serves the request better — the AI MAY propose a Custom Pipeline alongside the catalog option.

When to propose

Do NOT propose when a catalog workflow is a strong match (>80% of its steps are relevant). Catalog workflows encode validated best-practice sequences — prefer them.

How to build

1. Valid steps only — Use only canonical step ids — those appearing in workflow sequence arrays in workflows.json (each maps to a real .claude/skills/<step>/SKILL.md and is invoked as /<step>). No invented step names.
2. Logical order — Investigate → Plan → Implement → Test. Never reverse dependency order.
3. Minimal — Include only steps the prompt needs. No "just in case" additions.
4. Name it — Short descriptive name: "Quick Fix + Docs", "Audit + Test Coverage".

How to present (AskUserQuestion format)

Show full step sequences for ALL options so the user compares scope:

Option A — Activate "Bug Fix" workflow (Recommended)
  Steps: /scout → /investigate → /debug-investigate → /plan → /fix → /prove-fix → /test → ...

Option B — Custom Pipeline: "Quick Fix + Docs"
  Steps: /scout → /investigate → /fix → /docs-update
  Rationale: Prompt targets a known location — full TDD cycle is over-engineered here.

Rules:

• Always show full step list per option
• One-sentence AI rationale for the custom pipeline
• Catalog workflow = "(Recommended)" unless custom pipeline confidence is clearly higher
• NEVER present custom pipeline as the only option — always include the catalog option
• For project-specific architecture, test, documentation, naming, or workflow rules, read docs/project-config.json and docs/project-reference/docs-index-reference.md; keep this reusable start-workflow protocol generic.

Task creation for Custom Pipeline

Same 1:1 protocol — one TaskCreate per step. Use [Custom] prefix to distinguish from catalog tasks:

TaskCreate: subject="[Custom] {step-name} — {brief description}", description="Custom pipeline step N/{total}.", activeForm="Executing {step-name}"

Workflow Lookup — Tier 1 Selection, Tier 2 Execution

Use Tier 1 to select every route. For the three policy-bound delivery workflows (workflow-big-feature, workflow-bugfix, and workflow-feature), use Tier 2 before TaskCreate to materialize their execution contract because static catalogs omit the terminal-refresh pre-action. Other workflows retain their existing Tier-1 task materialization unless parallelGroups metadata is required.

Tier 1: Context (FREE — no file reads)

The workflow catalog is already present in static host context — derived into CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, and Codex context rather than injected by a hook. Its headings and row grammar vary by host.

1. Search the available catalog surface for the exact workflow ID: {workflowId}.
2. Use its name and whenToUse summary only to confirm the route.
3. For workflow-big-feature, workflow-bugfix, and workflow-feature, do NOT parse a static catalog sequence or command syntax for TaskCreate; Tier 1 is route selection only. Other workflows retain their existing Tier-1 task materialization unless a Tier-2 parallelGroups read is required.

✅ Use Tier 1 for: route selection, and existing task materialization for workflows outside the policy-bound delivery set. ⚠️ Tier 2 is required immediately after selection and before TaskCreate for only workflow-big-feature, workflow-bugfix, and workflow-feature, plus any activation that needs canonical parallelGroups. The complete canonical entry loads sequence, preActions.injectContext, and parallelGroups.

Tier 2: Complete Canonical Entry Read (JSON-aware)

After Tier 1 identifies a policy-bound delivery workflow or an activation needing parallelGroups, use this selected-entry read before creating tasks. For the three delivery workflows, the static catalog is a route-selection aid; the selected canonical entry remains the execution contract:

node .claude/scripts/codex/read-workflow-entry.mjs <workflowId>

This JSON-aware helper prints the complete workflows[workflowId] object only, including every sequence step even when the entry is long. It accepts the exact Tier-1-selected workflow ID as a data argument; it does not interpolate it into a shell command. Parse: sequence array → step IDs, preActions.injectContext, and parallelGroups → invoke each with the active host's command syntax for that step.

Tier 3: Missing Entry (stop)

If the JSON-aware lookup cannot return the exact selected entry, stop and report catalog drift or a missing canonical workflow. Do not fall back to a fixed-context grep, and do not expose the full file to context.

After Activation — Task Creation Protocol (ZERO TOLERANCE)

Active-goal resolution (BEFORE child task creation): resolve the active Goal Contract per SYNC:goal-contract-satisfaction-loop — active plan goal.md, else plans/goals/{YYMMDD-HHmm}-{slug}/goal.md, else create one from the current user request using .claude/templates/goal-contract-template.md. Record the resolved goal path and pass it to every child step/sub-agent so the whole workflow executes against the same saved success criteria. The workflow may end only when the goal's Goal Satisfaction matrix passes or a blocker is escalated.

FIRST action after activation: create EXACTLY one TaskCreate for EACH entry in the workflow's sequence array.

How to read workflows.json — CRITICAL SCHEMA

workflows.json is a JSON OBJECT, not an array. Most common AI mistake.

{
  "settings":       { ... },
  "workflows":      { <workflowId>: WorkflowEntry }   ← OBJECT, keyed by ID
}

Lookup algorithm:

workflow = workflows[workflowId]           // key lookup — NOT .find(), NOT [index]
steps    = workflow.sequence               // array of step ID strings
invocation = resolveActiveHostSyntax(stepId) // e.g. the active host's syntax for "scout"

WorkflowEntry fields:

FORBIDDEN (common mistakes):

// ❌ WRONG
workflows.find(w => w.id === workflowId)
workflows[0]

// ✅ CORRECT
workflows[workflowId]
Object.keys(workflows)   // list all IDs

Task creation steps

1. Tier 1 first (no file read): search the available static catalog surface for {workflowId}. For workflows outside the policy-bound delivery set, use its established active-host sequence to create tasks unless canonical parallelGroups metadata is required.
2. Tier 2 required before TaskCreate only for workflow-big-feature, workflow-bugfix, and workflow-feature, or when parallelGroups metadata is required: node .claude/scripts/codex/read-workflow-entry.mjs <workflowId> → treat the complete selected entry's sequence, preActions.injectContext, and parallelGroups as canonical. If the static preview differs, stop and report catalog drift rather than choosing one silently.
3. Apply delivery-workflow pre-actions to task context: preserve the selected entry's preActions.injectContext as workflow-level execution context. For every conditional step it governs, put the exact run condition and evidence-backed skip transition in that task's description; never infer or drop a predicate because the static catalog rendered only a step name.
4. Create one TaskCreate per selected sequence step IN ORDER

See Workflow Lookup — Token-Efficient (3-Tier Strategy) above for full lookup rules and fallback chain.

Task format:

TaskCreate: subject="[Workflow] {step-name} — {brief description}", description="Workflow step N/{total}. {conditional note}", activeForm="Executing {step-name}"

Rules (NON-NEGOTIABLE):

• 1:1 mapping — each sequence entry = exactly one task. No consolidation, no invented tasks.
• Conditional steps still get tasks — add the exact canonical run condition and evidence-backed skip transition to the description; when the selected canonical preActions.injectContext authorizes that skip, it may complete without a Skill invocation after the cited comment. Never use a generic skip label.
• Delivery-workflow pre-actions are mandatory execution input — after Tier 1 selects workflow-big-feature, workflow-bugfix, or workflow-feature, Tier 2 must load preActions.injectContext before TaskCreate. A conditional step's task description must state its canonical run condition and evidence-backed skip transition.
• Recursive self-calls get tasks — e.g., [Workflow] /workflow-review-changes — Recursive re-review (conditional)
• Count verification — after creation: task count == len(sequence). Fix mismatch before proceeding.

Parallel waves from parallelGroups (compute at activation, BEFORE the first task runs)

A workflow MAY declare barrier groups in parallelGroups (schema: .claude/workflows.schema.json → WorkflowEntry.parallelGroups; live example: workflow-review-changes, groups initial-reviews and reviewers). Materialize each declared group as a wave IN THE TASK LIST, so the barrier is visible in the tasks and not only in prose.

1. Read parallelGroups alongside sequence. Tier 1 (## Workflow Catalog in CLAUDE.md) renders members FLAT and carries no group data. Tier 2's JSON-aware selected-entry lookup supplies parallelGroups with sequence.
2. Expand any barrier token you were given. The Codex mirrors (AGENTS.md, .codex/CODEX_CONTEXT.md) collapse a group into ONE [parallel ⇉ all-return barrier: a, b] token ( = conditional member). That token is a barrier marker, NOT a step — expand it back to its member steps and create one task per member.
3. Task count is still len(sequence). A group NEVER collapses its members into a single task; it only adds wave metadata to the member tasks.
4. Tag each member task — subject [Workflow] [wave: {groupId}] /{step} — {brief description}, description Workflow step N/{total}. Parallel group '{groupId}' — spawned together with {other members}; barrier: advance only after ALL members return. {conditional note}.
5. Conditional members still get their own task — add "Conditional — a skipped member still counts as returned for the barrier"; skip via in_progress → comment → completed, never delete.
6. Execute a group as ONE wave — spawn every member in ONE message, barrier on all returns, then advance to the first step after the group. That next step is a SEQ boundary: never start it — and never start any code-mutating step — while a member is still in flight.
7. Malformed group → STOP, do not repair. A member absent from sequence, a member in two groups, or barrier ≠ true means the workflow definition is broken: report it and run the sequence strictly in order rather than guessing the intended grouping.

When a workflow declares NO parallelGroups

sequence is the source of truth. Absence of parallelGroups is NOT permission to invent groups.

• NEVER reorder, merge, drop, or co-schedule steps in any way that contradicts sequence — no self-authored wave may run a step ahead of a step that precedes it in sequence, and a workflow's fixed order overrides any independence you infer.
• DO surface a candidate wave when adjacent steps are obviously independent — ALL of: (a) contiguous in sequence, (b) read-only / report-producing (review, scan, investigation, research — each writes only its own plans/reports/ file), (c) neither consumes the other's output. Announce it as Candidate wave (not declared): [...] and keep the 1:1 tasks unchanged.
• NEVER put in a candidate wave: any step that writes source files, any gate awaiting user approval, any step consuming a previous step's output, or any non-adjacent pair. When in doubt → run sequentially; a wrong wave silently reorders the workflow, a missed wave only costs time.
• Persist what proves right — if a candidate wave was correct, tell the user to add a parallelGroups entry to .claude/workflows.json (never edit it mid-run). An undeclared wave must never become the de-facto sequence.

Create ALL tasks first → then TaskUpdate first task to in_progress.

Step Execution Protocol

Per required (non-skipped) step: TaskUpdate in_progress → invoke Skill tool → complete skill → TaskUpdate completed.

• Completing a task without invoking its Skill tool = workflow violation, except for a conditionally skipped task explicitly authorized by the selected canonical pre-action, which may complete without invoking its Skill tool after its cited comment
• Validation gates (/plan-validate, /plan-review, /why-review) MUST use explicit evidence and local project protocol — NEVER auto-approve inferred decisions. Explicit user approval in the prompt may satisfy the gate only when the gate's skill permits it.
• To skip a conditionally authorized step: TaskUpdate in_progress → cited comment "Skipped — {reason}" → TaskUpdate completed without invoking its Skill tool. Never delete.

Workflow-in-Workflow Gate (HARD GATE)

Some workflow steps ARE themselves full workflows. The DEFAULT for a step that activates a multi-step workflow is sub-agent delegation — running it inline causes the parent session to absorb the entire nested workflow's tool calls, file reads, and sub-agent reports (context overflow on long sequences). The sub-agent runs the nested workflow in isolation and returns ONLY a SYNC:subagent-return-contract summary (full findings to plans/reports/).

Default protocol (sub-agent delegation) for a nested-workflow step:

1. NEVER invoke via inline Skill tool call
2. Spawn via Agent tool with the appropriate subagent_type
3. Agent prompt must include: current git diff context + feature/task description
4. Sub-agent runs the full nested workflow in its isolated context
5. Return ONLY SYNC:subagent-return-contract summary — write full findings to plans/reports/
6. Main agent reads plans/reports/ file only when resolving specific blockers

EXCEPTION — workflow-review-changes runs INLINE in the main session (never a sub-agent):

When /workflow-review-changes appears in any workflow sequence (e.g. workflow-feature, workflow-bugfix, workflow-refactor), invoke it via the Skill tool INLINE — do NOT spawn it as an Agent sub-agent.

The ⚠️ [WORKFLOW-IN-WORKFLOW GATE] is model-driven: apply it (default sub-agent, or the workflow-review-changes inline exception) yourself whenever the next step activates a nested workflow — no hook emits this warning.

IMPORTANT MANDATORY Steps: detect-workflow -> analyze-best-match -> auto-select-execution-path -> activate-workflow -> create-task-tracking -> execute-sequence

IMPORTANT MANDATORY Steps: detect-workflow -> analyze-best-match -> auto-select-execution-path -> activate-workflow -> create-task-tracking -> execute-sequence

[MANDATORY] TaskCreate FIRST — break every workflow into tasks before any action. NEVER skip.
[MANDATORY] Auto-select the best path for auto-detected workflows; do not use AskUserQuestion for workflow-selection confirmation. Explicit workflow invocation executes directly.
[MANDATORY] Skill tool REQUIRED for every non-skipped step. The sole exception is an evidence-backed conditional skip explicitly authorized by the selected canonical preActions.injectContext.

<!-- SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention -->

AI Mistake Prevention — Failure modes to avoid on every task:

Re-read files after context changes. Context compaction, resume, or long-running work can make memory stale; verify current files before acting.
Verify generated content against source evidence. AI hallucinates APIs, names, claims, and document facts. Check the relevant source before documenting or referencing.
Check downstream references before deleting or renaming. Removing an artifact can stale docs, generated mirrors, configs, and callers; map references first.
Trace the full impact chain after edits. Changing a definition can miss derived outputs and consumers. Follow the affected chain before declaring done.
Verify ALL affected outputs, not just the first. One green check is not all green checks; validate every output surface the change can affect.
Assume existing values are intentional — ask WHY before changing OR flagging one as a defect. Before changing or reporting a constant, limit, flag, cutoff, wording, or pattern, read nearby context and history, the CALLER's ordering, and 2+ sibling call sites of the same convention. A doc stating WHAT without WHY is missing rationale, not proof of a missing guard.
Surface ambiguity before acting — don't pick silently. Multiple valid interpretations require an explicit question or stated assumption with risk.
Assert the outcome your system owns, not the intermediate state your infrastructure owns. When verifying async work, assert the final business state — never the delivery/retry bookkeeping held in shared infrastructure that any co-running process can write. Such a check passes when run alone and flakes the moment anything else shares that infrastructure.
Keep shared guidance role-relevant. Universal guidance must help every receiving skill or agent; code-specific obligations belong only in code-specific protocols.

<!-- /SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention -->

<!-- SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset -->

Critical Thinking Mindset — Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act.
Anti-hallucination: Never present guess as fact — cite sources for every claim, admit uncertainty freely, self-check output for errors, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence — certainty without evidence root of all hallucination.

<!-- /SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset -->

<!-- SYNC:incremental-persistence -->

Incremental Result Persistence — MANDATORY for all sub-agents or heavy inline steps processing >3 files.

1. Before starting: Create report file plans/reports/{skill}-{date}-{slug}.md
2. After each file/section reviewed: Append findings to report immediately — never hold in memory
3. Return to main agent: Summary only (per SYNC:subagent-return-contract) with Full report: path
4. Main agent: Reads report file only when resolving specific blockers

Why: Context cutoff mid-execution loses ALL in-memory findings. Each disk write survives compaction. Partial results are better than no results.

Report naming: plans/reports/{skill-name}-{YYMMDD}-{HHmm}-{slug}.md

<!-- /SYNC:incremental-persistence -->

<!-- SYNC:subagent-return-contract -->

Sub-Agent Return Contract — When this skill spawns a sub-agent, the sub-agent MUST return ONLY this structure. Main agent reads only this summary — NEVER requests full sub-agent output inline.

```markdown
## Sub-Agent Result: [skill-name]

Status: ✅ PASS | ⚠️ PARTIAL | ❌ FAIL
Confidence: [0-100]%

### Findings (Critical/High only — max 10 bullets)

- [severity] [file:line] [finding]

### Actions Taken

- [file changed] [what changed]

### Blockers (if any)

- [blocker description]

Full report: plans/reports/[skill-name]-[date]-[slug].md
```

Main agent reads Full report file ONLY when: (a) resolving a specific blocker, or (b) building a fix plan.
Sub-agent writes full report incrementally (per SYNC:incremental-persistence) — not held in memory.

Context budget — the return payload is a SUMMARY, not a transcript: ≤10 finding bullets, no raw file contents / full diffs / verbatim logs inline, no re-pasted source. Everything beyond the summary lives in the Full report on disk. A sub-agent that would exceed the summary shape MUST write the detail to its report and return only the pointer — the orchestrator's context is the scarce resource the whole map-reduce protects.

<!-- /SYNC:subagent-return-contract -->

<!-- SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset:reminder -->

MUST ATTENTION apply critical + sequential thinking — every claim needs appropriate traced evidence (file:line for repo/code claims; source URL or artifact section for research, product, content, and docs claims); confidence >80% to act, <60% DO NOT recommend. Anti-hallucination: never present guess as fact, admit uncertainty freely, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence.

<!-- /SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset:reminder -->

<!-- SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention:reminder -->

MUST ATTENTION apply AI mistake prevention — verify generated content against evidence, trace downstream references before deleting or renaming, verify all affected outputs, re-read files after context loss, and surface ambiguity before acting.

<!-- /SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention:reminder -->

<!-- SYNC:goal-contract-satisfaction-loop:reminder -->

• MANDATORY Resolve the active Goal Contract BEFORE work (active plan goal.md → plans/goals/{YYMMDD-HHmm}-{slug}/goal.md → create from current request) and read saved success criteria before editing.
• MANDATORY Append iteration evidence after execution; emit a Goal Satisfaction matrix (PASS/FAIL/BLOCKED) before reporting PASS; loop on validated FAIL; escalate repeated no-progress or blockers. NEVER store secrets in goal files.

<!-- /SYNC:goal-contract-satisfaction-loop:reminder -->

<!-- SYNC:parallel-subagent-dispatch -->

Parallel Sub-Agent Dispatch — Plan parallelism the moment a task breakdown exists, BEFORE executing it — running provably independent tasks sequentially wastes wall-clock. Applies to every multi-step job: workflow steps, planning, batch updates, investigation, research, scans, reviews, doc sync. Plan execution is metadata-gated, NEVER default-parallel — fan-out follows ONLY what the plan declares (PAR/SEQ tags + per-phase write set); an untagged plan runs sequentially — why: a derived write set cannot see cascade or generated writes.

1. Tag every task PAR or SEQ. PAR = inputs exclude every pending task's output AND write set disjoint from every other PAR. Else SEQ — MUST ATTENTION name the dependency forcing it.
2. Group PAR into waves. No edge between members. Two writers of one file NEVER share a wave. Read-only work (search, investigation, review, research) parallelizes freely.
3. Declare before dispatch: Parallel plan: wave 1 = [...] · wave 2 = [...] · SEQ = [...] (reason).
4. Spawn each wave in ONE message — every Agent call in one response, NEVER dripped per turn. Route each task to its specialist (.claude/skills/shared/sub-agent-selection-guide.md); NEVER code-reviewer as catch-all.
5. Brief each sub-agent self-contained: goal · scope + owned files · reference docs · return contract (summary + Full report: path, per SYNC:subagent-return-contract) · incremental persistence to plans/reports/ (per SYNC:incremental-persistence).
6. Barrier per wave. Advance ONLY after EVERY member returns (a skipped conditional counts as returned). Merge, mark each task completed/skipped, THEN dispatch the next wave. Mutating steps wait for the barrier.
7. One level deep. A dispatched sub-agent executes its own brief; further fan-out stays the orchestrator's job unless that agent's .claude/agents/*.md definition authorizes it.

NEVER parallelize: tasks sharing a write target · a task consuming a pending task's output · trivial single-file work (dispatch overhead > gain) · an order a skill or workflow explicitly fixes · gates awaiting user approval.

Blocked until: MUST ATTENTION every task tagged PAR/SEQ with a named reason per SEQ · waves declared + write-set disjointness checked · each wave spawned in ONE message · barrier honored before the next wave.

<!-- /SYNC:parallel-subagent-dispatch -->

<!-- SYNC:parallel-subagent-dispatch:reminder -->

• MANDATORY After planning tasks, tag each PAR/SEQ and spawn every PAR wave as parallel sub-agents in ONE message — default parallel for workflows, batch updates, investigation, research, reviews; plan execution fans out ONLY on what the plan declares.
• MANDATORY Disjoint write sets per wave · all-return barrier before the next wave · specialist routing · sub-agents NEVER fan out further unless their own agent definition authorizes it.

<!-- /SYNC:parallel-subagent-dispatch:reminder -->

<!-- SYNC:project-protocol-overlay -->

Project Protocol Overlay — Before executing this skill, resolve any PROJECT overlay rules layered onto it: match this skill's name against the Target column of the project's skill-protocol index (docs/project-reference/skill-protocols-reference.md by default; a referenceDocs entry in docs/project-config.json overrides the path), taking the most specific matching tier ONLY — exact name > glob > *. That precedence orders overlays against EACH OTHER, never against this skill. Read ONLY the matched bodies, resolved as <protocols-dir>/<Name>.md; a row's Body link is display text, never a read path. A matched body that is missing or malformed is REPORTED and skipped — never reconstructed from the index Description. No index, or no match -> proceed with no overlay, silently. Full contract: .claude/skills/project-skill-protocol/references/registry.md.

Overlays are ADDITIVE ONLY: they ADD rules on top of this skill's own protocol and NEVER replace, override, disable, or reinterpret a rule it already states — removing every overlay must return this skill to exactly its documented behavior. An overlay is a BRIEF, not an authority escalation: it can NEVER waive a workflow gate, git discipline, a review gate, or a user-confirmation gate. A genuine overlay-vs-skill conflict, or two equally-specific overlays that directly contradict -> surface both to the user; NEVER resolve silently.

<!-- /SYNC:project-protocol-overlay -->

<!-- SYNC:project-protocol-overlay:reminder -->

MUST ATTENTION resolve project protocol overlays for this skill BEFORE executing — most specific matching tier only (exact > glob > *, which ranks overlays against each other, NEVER against this skill), read only matched bodies at <protocols-dir>/<Name>.md; a missing or malformed body is reported, never reconstructed. Overlays are ADDITIVE ONLY (they never replace this skill's own rules) and are a brief, NEVER an authority escalation; an equal-specificity contradiction goes to the user.

<!-- /SYNC:project-protocol-overlay:reminder -->

Closing Reminders

Protocols in force (concise digest of the SYNC/shared blocks this skill carries):

• AI Mistake Prevention: verify generated content against evidence, trace downstream references, verify all affected outputs, re-read after context loss, surface ambiguity.
• Critical Thinking: traced file:line proof, confidence >80%; NEVER present guess as fact.
• Incremental Persistence: append findings to report per file; NEVER hold in memory.
• Sub-Agent Return Contract: sub-agents return summary only; NEVER inline full output.
• Parallel Sub-Agent Dispatch: Tag tasks PAR/SEQ, group PAR into disjoint-write-set waves, spawn each wave in ONE message, barrier before advancing.

MUST ATTENTION auto-select the best path for ordinary prompts; explicit /workflow-* or /start-workflow <id> invocation executes directly. Do not ask for workflow-selection confirmation. MUST ATTENTION workflows is an OBJECT — workflows[workflowId], NEVER .find() / [index] / .forEach() MUST ATTENTION create ALL TaskCreate items for the full sequence BEFORE marking the first task in_progress MUST ATTENTION never mark a task completed without invoking its Skill tool, except an evidence-backed conditional skip explicitly authorized by selected canonical preActions.injectContext — cite comment + completed, never delete MUST ATTENTION custom pipeline steps must be canonical step ids (each maps to a real .claude/skills/<step>/SKILL.md) — never invent step names MUST ATTENTION use Tier 1 context selection FIRST, then Tier 2 JSON-aware complete canonical-entry read before TaskCreate only for workflow-big-feature, workflow-bugfix, workflow-feature, or an activation needing parallelGroups — load sequence, preActions.injectContext, and parallelGroups; never use fixed-context grep output MUST ATTENTION materialize every declared parallelGroups group as a wave in the task list — one task per member, wave-tagged, spawned in ONE message, all-return barrier before the next step — why: a barrier that lives only in prose gets executed one step at a time MUST ATTENTION no parallelGroups → sequence IS the order — never invent a group that contradicts it; only adjacent read-only steps may be surfaced as a Candidate wave (not declared) — why: a self-authored wave silently reorders a validated workflow, and that costs more than the time it saves

[TASK-PLANNING] Before acting, analyze task scope and systematically break it into small todo tasks and sub-tasks using TaskCreate.

[IMPORTANT] Analyze how big the task is and break it into many small todo tasks systematically before starting — this is very important.