dragoon0x/everything-design-taste

taste-audit

Automated quality gate that scans design output for AI slop patterns, writing quality, accessibility baseline, and brand consistency violations.

First seen Jul 18, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add dragoon0x/everything-design-taste --skill taste-audit

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from dragoon0x/everything-design-taste · top by installs.

npx skills add dragoon0x/everything-design-taste

Browse all from dragoon0x/everything-design-taste

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Repository health

Stars 11
License LICENSE
Default branch main
Open issues 0
Status Active

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 2,348 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 163 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 2 installs

SKILL.md

Taste Audit

What It Checks

1. AI Slop Score (0-10, lower is better)

Scans for:

  • Default/generic font usage (Inter, Roboto, Arial without justification)
  • Purple-to-blue gradient patterns
  • Generic card grid layouts
  • Stock hero section patterns
  • Cookie-cutter button copy ("Get Started", "Learn More")
  • Overused component patterns without variation

Scoring:

  • 0-2: Clean. Intentional design choices.
  • 3-5: Mild slop. Some generic patterns leaking in.
  • 6-8: Significant slop. Needs creative intervention.
  • 9-10: Full AI default. Start over with a creative brief.

2. Writing Quality Score (0-10, higher is better)

Scans for:

  • AI tone markers (see copy-editor agent for full list)
  • Corporate buzzwords
  • Em-dash overuse
  • Passive voice excess
  • Filler phrases
  • Generic CTAs

3. Accessibility Baseline

Checks:

  • Color contrast ratios (WCAG AA)
  • Focus indicator presence
  • Alt text on images
  • Semantic HTML structure
  • Touch target sizes (44px minimum)
  • Reduced motion support

4. Hierarchy Check

Evaluates:

  • Clear visual weight distribution
  • Logical heading order (H1 > H2 > H3, no skips)
  • CTA prominence relative to other elements
  • Information grouping via proximity

5. Consistency Check

Looks for:

  • Spacing value consistency (are values from the scale?)
  • Color token consistency (raw hex vs token usage)
  • Typography consistency (type scale adherence)
  • Component pattern consistency

Output Format

## Taste Audit Report

### Overall Grade: [A-F]

| Check | Score | Status |
|-------|-------|--------|
| AI Slop | X/10 | PASS/WARN/FAIL |
| Writing | X/10 | PASS/WARN/FAIL |
| Accessibility | X/10 | PASS/WARN/FAIL |
| Hierarchy | X/10 | PASS/WARN/FAIL |
| Consistency | X/10 | PASS/WARN/FAIL |

### Issues Found
[Prioritized list of specific issues with locations]

### Recommendations
[Actionable fixes, most impactful first]

Pass Criteria

  • AI Slop: 4 or below
  • Writing: 7 or above
  • Accessibility: 8 or above
  • Hierarchy: 7 or above
  • Consistency: 7 or above
  • Overall: No FAIL on any check