d-wwei/openclaw-financial-services · Archived

fsi-pe-investment-committee-memo

Draft a structured investment committee memo for PE deal approval. Synthesizes due diligence findings, financial analysis, and deal terms into a professional IC-ready document. Use when preparing for investment committee, writing up a deal, or creating a formal recommendation. Triggers on "write IC memo", "investment committee memo", "deal write-up", "prepare IC materials", or "recommendation memo".

First seen Jun 17, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add d-wwei/openclaw-financial-services --skill fsi-pe-investment-committee-memo

Stronger alternatives

This repository is archived — consider an actively maintained alternative.

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from d-wwei/openclaw-financial-services · top by installs.

npx skills add d-wwei/openclaw-financial-services

Browse all from d-wwei/openclaw-financial-services

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Repository health

Stars 15
License LICENSE
Default branch main
Open issues 0
Status Archived

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 3,016 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 442 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 3 installs

SKILL.md

Investment Committee Memo

Workflow

Step 1: Gather Inputs

Collect from the user (or from prior analysis in the session):

  • Company overview and business description
  • Industry/market context
  • Historical financials (3-5 years)
  • Management assessment
  • Deal terms (price, structure, financing)
  • Due diligence findings (commercial, financial, legal, operational)
  • Value creation plan / 100-day plan
  • Returns analysis (base, upside, downside)

Step 2: Draft Memo Structure

Standard IC memo format:

I. Executive Summary (1 page)

  • Company description, deal rationale, key terms
  • Recommendation and headline returns
  • Top 3 risks and mitigants

II. Company Overview (1-2 pages)

  • Business description, products/services
  • Customer base and go-to-market
  • Competitive positioning
  • Management team

III. Industry & Market (1 page)

  • Market size and growth
  • Competitive landscape
  • Secular trends / tailwinds
  • Regulatory environment

IV. Financial Analysis (2-3 pages)

  • Historical performance (revenue, EBITDA, margins, cash flow)
  • Quality of earnings adjustments
  • Working capital analysis
  • Capex requirements

V. Investment Thesis (1 page)

  • Why this is an attractive investment (3-5 pillars)
  • Value creation levers (organic growth, margin expansion, M&A, multiple expansion)
  • 100-day priorities

VI. Deal Terms & Structure (1 page)

  • Enterprise value and implied multiples
  • Sources & uses
  • Capital structure / leverage
  • Key legal terms

VII. Returns Analysis (1 page)

  • Base, upside, and downside scenarios
  • IRR and MOIC across scenarios
  • Key assumptions driving returns
  • Sensitivity analysis

VIII. Risk Factors (1 page)

  • Key risks ranked by severity and likelihood
  • Mitigants for each risk
  • Deal-breaker risks (if any)

IX. Recommendation

  • Clear recommendation: Proceed / Pass / Conditional proceed
  • Key conditions or next steps

Step 3: Output Format

  • Default: Word document (.docx) with professional formatting
  • Alternative: Markdown for quick review
  • Include tables for financials and returns, not just prose

Important Notes

  • IC memos should be factual and balanced — present both bull and bear cases honestly
  • Don't minimize risks. IC members will find them anyway; credibility matters
  • Use the firm's standard memo template if the user provides one
  • Financial tables should tie — check that EBITDA bridges, S&U balances, and returns math is consistent
  • Ask for missing inputs rather than making assumptions on deal terms or returns