When you want multi-source, multi-step research on a topic — competitor research before a sales call, market research for a new business idea, positioning angles, due diligence on a partnership or podcast guest, tech decision research (which DB, which auth), or any \"I need to actually understand X.\" Combines WebSearch, WebFetch, agent-browser, /last30days (Reddit/X/YouTube/HN/web recency), memory, and Notion. Outputs a structured brief with citations, contradictions, gaps, and recommended nex…
When you want multi-source, multi-step research on a topic — competitor research before a sales call, market research for a new business idea, positioning angles, due diligence on a partnership or podcast guest, tech decision research (which DB, which auth), or any \"I need to actually understand X.\" Combines WebSearch, WebFetch, agent-browser, /last30days (Reddit/X/YouTube/HN/web recency), memory, and Notion.
Outputs a structured brief with citations, contradictions, gaps, and recommended next steps.
Archives every research run to ~/.config/makerskills/deep-research/archive/ so past work is searchable.
Triggers on \"/deep-research,\" \"research X,\" \"investigate X,\" \"do a deep dive on X,\" \"look into X,\" \"what's actually happening with X,\" \"due diligence on X,\" \"validate this market.\" Differs from a one-shot WebSearch: this is multi-pass with verification.
Similar popular skills
Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.
Run discovery passes in parallel where possible. Sequential only when one source needs another's output (e.g., agent-browser a URL discovered by WebSearch).
Step 3 — Execute discovery
Run each chosen source. For each result, capture:
The source (URL or system)
1–3 sentence summary of what was said
Date / recency
Confidence in the source (high/medium/low)
Don't synthesize yet — just collect.
Step 4 — Synthesize
Group findings by theme or sub-question
Contradiction check — flag anywhere sources disagree. Don't average them; surface the disagreement.
Confidence: high (multiple independent sources agree), medium (one strong source or several weak), low (single anecdote or speculation)
Gaps: what would change the answer? What's NOT in the corpus?
Step 5 — Output the brief
Use this template:
# Research: <question>
**Date:** <YYYY-MM-DD>
**Decision this informs:** <one line>
**Confidence overall:** high / medium / low
## TL;DR
<2–4 sentences with the answer>
## Key findings
### 1. <Finding>
<2–4 sentences>. Sources: [1], [3], [5]
### 2. <Finding>
...
## Contradictions / uncertainty
- <where sources disagree, with each side cited>
## Gaps
- <what's missing from the corpus>
- <what to research next to close the gap>
## Recommended next steps
1. <action>
2. <action>
## Sources
[1] <Title> — <URL or system> (<date>) — <confidence>
[2] ...
Step 6 — Archive
Archives live in ${MAKERSKILLS_CONFIG:-$HOME/.config/makerskills}/deep-research/archive/ (create the directory if missing). Never write archives inside the skill's own folder — skill installs and upgrades re-sync from source and wipe anything saved there. Migration: if this skill's folder contains an old references/research-archive/ with user entries, move those files into the archive directory first.
Write the brief to <archive dir>/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>.md so it's grep-able forever. Slug = kebab-case of the topic.
Also append a one-line entry to <archive dir>/INDEX.md (create if missing):