collaborative-deep-research/agent-papers-cli

fact-check

Verify a specific claim by searching for evidence across web and academic sources. Use when the user asks to verify, fact-check, or confirm a statement.

First seen Feb 22, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add collaborative-deep-research/agent-papers-cli --skill fact-check

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from collaborative-deep-research/agent-papers-cli.

npx skills add collaborative-deep-research/agent-papers-cli

Browse all from collaborative-deep-research/agent-papers-cli

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Repository health

Stars 50
License LICENSE
Default branch main
Open issues 1
Status Active

Skill metadata

Parsed from SKILL.md frontmatter.

Allowed toolsBash, Read, Glob, Grep, Write

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 1,678 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 167 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 247 installs

SKILL.md

Fact-check the following claim: "$ARGUMENTS"

1. Decompose

Break the claim into specific, verifiable sub-claims. List them explicitly before searching.

2. Search for Evidence

For each sub-claim:

paper-search google web "<sub-claim as question>"
paper-search semanticscholar snippets "<sub-claim keywords>"
paper-search semanticscholar papers "<sub-claim keywords>" --limit 5

3. Verify Sources

For each promising source:

paper read <arxiv_id> <relevant section>   # for academic papers
paper-search browse <url>                   # for web pages

Prefer primary sources (original papers, official data) over secondary reports.

4. Assess

For each sub-claim, assign a verdict:

  • Supported: strong evidence from multiple reliable sources
  • Partially supported: some evidence, with caveats
  • Unsupported: no evidence found, or evidence contradicts the claim
  • Uncertain: insufficient evidence to judge

5. Report

Present:

  • The original claim
  • Each sub-claim with its verdict and supporting evidence
  • An overall assessment
  • All sources cited with URLs

Guidelines

  • Always cite specific sources — never state a verdict without evidence.
  • Distinguish between "no evidence found" and "evidence contradicts."
  • Note the quality and recency of sources.
  • If a claim is about a specific paper, read that paper directly rather than relying on summaries.