codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit

arch-check

Architecture conformance check: verifies an existing codebase against its declared architecture (VSA, Clean Architecture, DDD, Modular Monolith) — dependency direction, layer violations, module boundary leaks, and cycles — using token-cheap Roslyn MCP analysis. Invoke when: "check architecture", "architecture violations", "layer violations", "dependency direction", "module boundaries", "arch check", "is my architecture clean", "enforce architecture", "conformance check". For CHOOSING an archite…

Trending #3044 First seen Jul 24, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit --skill arch-check

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit · top by installs.

npx skills add codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit

Browse all from codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Repository health

Stars 700
License LICENSE
Default branch main
Open issues 6
Status Active

Skill metadata

Parsed from SKILL.md frontmatter.

Declared agents claude-code

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 5,944 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 967 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 1,000 installs

SKILL.md

/arch-check

What

Verifies that the code still matches the architecture it claims to have. Architectures rot through small, individually-reasonable changes — a Domain project that gains an EF Core reference, a module that reaches into a sibling's internals, an endpoint defined outside the host. This workflow catches the rot using project-graph and dependency analysis, not file-by-file reading.

Output: a violation report with severity, file:line evidence, and the concrete fix — or a clean conformance pass.

When

  • "check my architecture", "are there layer violations", "dependency direction"
  • Before a release or after a large feature lands
  • After onboarding to an unfamiliar codebase that claims an architecture
  • Recurring on teams where multiple people merge to shared modules
  • NOT for choosing an architecture — that is architecture-advisor

How

Step 1: Establish the declared architecture

In order of authority: the project's CLAUDE.md, an ADR in docs/decisions/, or ask the user. Never infer silently — a wrong baseline produces a wrong report. The four supported baselines and their rules:

Architecture Rules checked
Vertical Slice Features don't reference sibling features; shared code only via explicitly shared folders/projects
Clean Architecture Domain → nothing; Application → Domain only; Infrastructure → Application; Api → Application (never Api → Infrastructure types, wiring only)
DDD + Clean Clean rules + aggregates referenced only via roots; domain events for cross-aggregate effects
Modular Monolith No project references between modules except *.Contracts; cross-module calls via integration events or contracts

Step 2: Project-level dependency direction (cheapest, catches most)

get_project_graph()

Map every project reference against the baseline's allowed arrows. A single wrong reference here (Domain → Infrastructure) is a CRITICAL finding — it makes every downstream violation possible.

Step 3: Cycles

detect_circular_dependencies()

Cycles are violations in every baseline. Report the full chain.

Step 4: Namespace-level leaks (spot checks)

Project references can be clean while code still leaks. Probe the risky edges:

get_dependency_graph(symbolName: <a Domain entity>, depth: 2)
   -- Domain types pulling in EF Core, HttpClient, or Infrastructure namespaces?
find_references(symbolName: <a module-internal type>)
   -- referenced from outside its module?
detect_antipatterns()
   -- known structural smells as supporting evidence

Pick probes by baseline: Clean → sample 3-5 Domain entities and Application handlers; Modular Monolith → sample each module's internal types; VSA → sample types inside two or three feature folders.

Step 5: Presentation boundary

get_endpoint_map()

Endpoints must live only in the host/Api layer (Clean) or inside their owning module (Modular Monolith, VSA feature folders). An endpoint defined in an Application or shared project is a boundary violation. Unmarked auth on any endpoint is reported as a side-finding (route to /security-scan for depth).

Step 6: Report

Severity Meaning
CRITICAL Wrong-direction project reference, module-to-module reference, cycle
HIGH Namespace leak (Domain using Infrastructure/EF types), endpoint outside its layer
MEDIUM Shared-kernel logic creep, aggregate bypassed via direct member access
INFO Unmarked endpoint auth, antipattern hits worth a look

Each finding: evidence (file:line), why it violates the baseline, and the fix (move the code, invert with an interface, introduce a contracts project, raise an integration event). Offer to fix CRITICAL items immediately.

MCP Tools Used

  • getprojectgraph — reference-direction audit (the backbone)
  • detectcirculardependencies — cycle detection
  • getdependencygraph / find_references — namespace-level leak probes
  • getendpointmap — presentation boundary + auth posture
  • detect_antipatterns — supporting structural evidence

Example

User: /arch-check

Claude: Baseline from CLAUDE.md: Clean Architecture (4 projects).

  Project graph (get_project_graph)...
  CRITICAL  Domain → Infrastructure reference (Domain.csproj:14)
            Breaks the dependency rule; makes Domain untestable in isolation.
            Fix: invert — define IEmailSender in Application, implement in
            Infrastructure.
  Cycles (detect_circular_dependencies)... none.
  Leak probes on 4 Domain entities...
  HIGH      Order.cs:8 uses Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore (Domain must stay
            persistence-ignorant). Fix: move the [Index] config to
            OrderConfiguration in Infrastructure.
  Endpoint map... 23 endpoints, all in Api. 2 unmarked auth (side-finding —
  run /security-scan).

  Verdict: NOT conformant — 1 critical, 1 high. Fix the reference first;
  want me to do it now?

Related

  • architecture-advisor — choosing a baseline (before this skill is useful)
  • clean-architecture, vertical-slice, ddd, modular-monolith template — the rules being enforced
  • /security-scan — depth on the auth side-findings
  • /health-check — broader report card; arch-check is its architecture dimension in depth