aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts

user-research-analysis

Analyze user research data to uncover insights, identify patterns, and inform design decisions. Synthesize qualitative and quantitative research into actionable recommendations.

First seen Jan 21, 2026

Installation

$ npx skills add aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts --skill user-research-analysis

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts · top by installs.

npx skills add aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts

Browse all from aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Not declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Also listed on

Alternate registries and mirrors of this skill.

Repository health

Stars 334
License LICENSE
Default branch main
Open issues 1
Status Active

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 3,100 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 2,864 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 590 installs

SKILL.md

User Research Analysis

Table of Contents

  • [Overview](#overview)
  • [When to Use](#when-to-use)
  • [Quick Start](#quick-start)
  • [Reference Guides](#reference-guides)
  • [Best Practices](#best-practices)

Overview

Effective research analysis transforms raw data into actionable insights that guide product development and design.

When to Use

  • Synthesis of user interviews and surveys
  • Identifying patterns and themes
  • Validating design assumptions
  • Prioritizing user needs
  • Communicating insights to stakeholders
  • Informing design decisions

Quick Start

Minimal working example:

# Analyze qualitative and quantitative data

class ResearchAnalysis:
    def synthesize_interviews(self, interviews):
        """Extract themes and insights from interviews"""
        return {
            'interviews_analyzed': len(interviews),
            'methodology': 'Thematic coding and affinity mapping',
            'themes': self.identify_themes(interviews),
            'quotes': self.extract_key_quotes(interviews),
            'pain_points': self.identify_pain_points(interviews),
            'opportunities': self.identify_opportunities(interviews)
        }

    def identify_themes(self, interviews):
        """Find recurring patterns across interviews"""
        themes = {}
        theme_frequency = {}

        for interview in interviews:
            for statement in interview['statements']:
                theme = self.categorize_statement(statement)
                theme_frequency[theme] = theme_frequency.get(theme, 0) + 1

        # Sort by frequency
// ... (see reference guides for full implementation)

Reference Guides

Detailed implementations in the references/ directory:

Guide Contents
[Research Synthesis Methods](references/research-synthesis-methods.md) Research Synthesis Methods
[Affinity Mapping](references/affinity-mapping.md) Affinity Mapping
[Insight Documentation](references/insight-documentation.md) Insight Documentation
[Research Validation Matrix](references/research-validation-matrix.md) Research Validation Matrix

Best Practices

✅ DO

  • Use multiple research methods
  • Triangulate findings across sources
  • Document quotes and evidence
  • Look for patterns and frequency
  • Separate findings from interpretation
  • Validate findings with users
  • Share insights across team
  • Connect to design decisions
  • Document methodology
  • Iterate research approach based on learnings

❌ DON'T

  • Over-interpret small samples
  • Ignore conflicting data
  • Base decisions on single data point
  • Skip documentation
  • Cherry-pick quotes that support assumptions
  • Present without supporting evidence
  • Forget to note limitations
  • Analyze without involving participants
  • Create insights without actionable recommendations
  • Let research sit unused