npx skills add smithery/aj-geddes --skill user-research-analysis
aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts
user-research-analysis
Analyze user research data to uncover insights, identify patterns, and inform design decisions. Synthesize qualitative and quantitative research into actionable recommendations.
Installation
npx skills add aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts --skill user-research-analysis
Similar popular skills
Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.
Produce an intensive, cited analytical report: executive summary, multi-angle findings, contrar…
33.8K installsFind and synthesize research papers, whitepapers, PDFs, technical reports, and academic sources…
32.8K installsExtract market, financial, earnings, industry, and company metrics with Firecrawl. Use when the…
32K installsProduce pre-meeting lead intelligence briefs with Firecrawl. Use when the user needs company re…
31.2K installsOrganize research — manage references, notes, and collaboration.
28.1K installsFind the papers that answer a research query in Firecrawl's research paper index — a corpus of …
20.6K installsAlso in this package
Other skills from aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts · top by installs.
npx skills add aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts
More details
Agent compatibility
Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.
Also listed on
Alternate registries and mirrors of this skill.
Repository health
main
Package contents
Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.
-
skill md
SKILL.md3,100 B -
docs
SUMMARY.md2,864 B
History
- First seen on skills.sh
- First recorded snapshot · 590 installs
SKILL.md
User Research Analysis
Table of Contents
- [Overview](#overview)
- [When to Use](#when-to-use)
- [Quick Start](#quick-start)
- [Reference Guides](#reference-guides)
- [Best Practices](#best-practices)
Overview
Effective research analysis transforms raw data into actionable insights that guide product development and design.
When to Use
- Synthesis of user interviews and surveys
- Identifying patterns and themes
- Validating design assumptions
- Prioritizing user needs
- Communicating insights to stakeholders
- Informing design decisions
Quick Start
Minimal working example:
# Analyze qualitative and quantitative data
class ResearchAnalysis:
def synthesize_interviews(self, interviews):
"""Extract themes and insights from interviews"""
return {
'interviews_analyzed': len(interviews),
'methodology': 'Thematic coding and affinity mapping',
'themes': self.identify_themes(interviews),
'quotes': self.extract_key_quotes(interviews),
'pain_points': self.identify_pain_points(interviews),
'opportunities': self.identify_opportunities(interviews)
}
def identify_themes(self, interviews):
"""Find recurring patterns across interviews"""
themes = {}
theme_frequency = {}
for interview in interviews:
for statement in interview['statements']:
theme = self.categorize_statement(statement)
theme_frequency[theme] = theme_frequency.get(theme, 0) + 1
# Sort by frequency
// ... (see reference guides for full implementation)
Reference Guides
Detailed implementations in the references/ directory:
| Guide | Contents |
|---|---|
| [Research Synthesis Methods](references/research-synthesis-methods.md) | Research Synthesis Methods |
| [Affinity Mapping](references/affinity-mapping.md) | Affinity Mapping |
| [Insight Documentation](references/insight-documentation.md) | Insight Documentation |
| [Research Validation Matrix](references/research-validation-matrix.md) | Research Validation Matrix |
Best Practices
✅ DO
- Use multiple research methods
- Triangulate findings across sources
- Document quotes and evidence
- Look for patterns and frequency
- Separate findings from interpretation
- Validate findings with users
- Share insights across team
- Connect to design decisions
- Document methodology
- Iterate research approach based on learnings
❌ DON'T
- Over-interpret small samples
- Ignore conflicting data
- Base decisions on single data point
- Skip documentation
- Cherry-pick quotes that support assumptions
- Present without supporting evidence
- Forget to note limitations
- Analyze without involving participants
- Create insights without actionable recommendations
- Let research sit unused