affaan-m/ecc

product-lens

Use this skill to validate the "why" before building, run product diagnostics, and pressure-test product direction before the request becomes an implementation contract.

All-time #2123 Trending #2538 First seen May 19, 2026
8-week activity · all time api

Installation

$ npx skills add affaan-m/ecc --skill product-lens

Similar popular skills

Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.

Also in this package

Other skills from affaan-m/ecc · top by installs.

npx skills add affaan-m/ecc

Browse all from affaan-m/ecc

More details

Agent compatibility

Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.

Claude Code Declared
Cursor Not declared
Codex Not declared
GitHub Copilot Not declared
Windsurf Not declared
Gemini CLI Not declared
Cline Not declared
OpenCode Not declared

Repository health

Stars 254.3K
License LICENSE
Default branch main
Open issues 54
Status Active

Skill metadata

Parsed from SKILL.md frontmatter.

Declared agents claude-code
More metadata
origin
ECC

Package contents

Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.

  • skill md SKILL.md 3,102 B
  • docs SUMMARY.md 186 B

History

  1. First seen on skills.sh
  2. First recorded snapshot · 7,251 installs

SKILL.md

Product Lens — Think Before You Build

This lane owns product diagnosis, not implementation-ready specification writing.

If the user needs a durable PRD-to-SRS or capability-contract artifact, hand off to product-capability.

When to Use

  • Before starting any feature — validate the "why"
  • Weekly product review — are we building the right thing?
  • When stuck choosing between features
  • Before a launch — sanity check the user journey
  • When converting a vague idea into a product brief before engineering planning starts

How It Works

Mode 1: Product Diagnostic

Like YC office hours but automated. Asks the hard questions:

1. Who is this for? (specific person, not "developers")
2. What's the pain? (quantify: how often, how bad, what do they do today?)
3. Why now? (what changed that makes this possible/necessary?)
4. What's the 10-star version? (if money/time were unlimited)
5. What's the MVP? (smallest thing that proves the thesis)
6. What's the anti-goal? (what are you explicitly NOT building?)
7. How do you know it's working? (metric, not vibes)

Output: a PRODUCT-BRIEF.md with answers, risks, and a go/no-go recommendation.

If the result is "yes, build this," the next lane is product-capability, not more founder-theater.

Mode 2: Founder Review

Reviews your current project through a founder lens:

1. Read README, CLAUDE.md, package.json, recent commits
2. Infer: what is this trying to be?
3. Score: product-market fit signals (0-10)
   - Usage growth trajectory
   - Retention indicators (repeat contributors, return users)
   - Revenue signals (pricing page, billing code, Stripe integration)
   - Competitive moat (what's hard to copy?)
4. Identify: the one thing that would 10x this
5. Flag: things you're building that don't matter

Mode 3: User Journey Audit

Maps the actual user experience:

1. Clone/install the product as a new user
2. Document every friction point (confusing steps, errors, missing docs)
3. Time each step
4. Compare to competitor onboarding
5. Score: time-to-value (how long until the user gets their first win?)
6. Recommend: top 3 fixes for onboarding

Mode 4: Feature Prioritization

When you have 10 ideas and need to pick 2:

1. List all candidate features
2. Score each on: impact (1-5) × confidence (1-5) ÷ effort (1-5)
3. Rank by ICE score
4. Apply constraints: runway, team size, dependencies
5. Output: prioritized roadmap with rationale

Output

All modes output actionable docs, not essays. Every recommendation has a specific next step.

Integration

Pair with:

  • /browser-qa to verify the user journey audit findings
  • /design-system audit for visual polish assessment
  • /canary-watch for post-launch monitoring
  • product-capability when the product brief needs to become an implementation-ready capability plan