Analyzed May 7, 2026
This skill provides a comprehensive framework and a local shell script for auditing web page quality. It evaluates HTML files for performance, accessibility, SEO, and best practices using standard system utilities.
addyosmani/web-quality-skills
Run an evidence-led web quality audit covering performance, accessibility, SEO, best practices, and agentic browsing. Use when asked to "audit my site", "review web quality", "run lighthouse audit", "check page quality", or "optimize my website".
npx skills add addyosmani/web-quality-skills --skill web-quality-audit
Related neighbors and high-traction skills in the same topics — useful to compare before installing.
Expert guidance on validating, optimizing, and ensuring quality of Mapbox styles through valida…
1.6K installsRun a complete quality engineering audit on any codebase. Derives behavioral requirements from …
1.6K installsConducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written…
38.9K installsRun an extremely strict maintainability review for abstraction quality, giant files, and spaghe…
15.4K installsImplement data quality validation with Great Expectations, dbt tests, and data contracts. Use w…
9.8K installsWrite-time code quality enforcement using Plankton — auto-formatting, linting, and Claude-power…
8.1K installsPartner security reviews for this skill.
Analyzed May 7, 2026
This skill provides a comprehensive framework and a local shell script for auditing web page quality. It evaluates HTML files for performance, accessibility, SEO, and best practices using standard system utilities.
Analyzed May 7, 2026
No issues detected.
Analyzed May 7, 2026
0 alerts
Other skills from addyosmani/web-quality-skills.
npx skills add addyosmani/web-quality-skills
Declared targets from SKILL.md / docs. Unmarked agents are not listed — the skill may still install via the CLI.
main
Parsed from SKILL.md frontmatter.
Files included with this skill beyond the listing page.
SKILL.md
10,450 B
SUMMARY.md
268 B
Comprehensive quality review that combines live browser evidence with source inspection. Covers Performance, Accessibility, SEO, Best Practices, and Agentic Browsing without treating an aggregate score as proof of quality.
Lighthouse 13+. The Performance category now uses shared Performance Insights across Lighthouse and the DevTools Performance panel (announcement). Follow current insight names and evidence. Do not require removed audit IDs or automatically recreate their recommendations; some were retired because they were noisy, inactionable, or easy to over-recommend.
Use the best capability already available; do not block the audit on optional setup.
| Need | Preferred route | Fallback |
|---|---|---|
| Performance and Core Web Vitals | Record a browser performance trace and analyze focused insights; with Chrome DevTools MCP, use performancestarttrace then performanceanalyzeinsight |
Lighthouse CLI or PageSpeed Insights lab data |
| Real-user performance | CrUX values included in current DevTools trace summaries | PageSpeed Insights/CrUX Vis; direct CrUX API only when a key is already available or automation is requested |
| Accessibility, SEO, Best Practices, Agentic Browsing | Run a live Lighthouse audit; with Chrome DevTools MCP, use lighthouse_audit |
Category-specific Lighthouse CLI audits plus manual checks |
| Rendered semantics and interaction | Inspect the accessibility tree and exercise the UI; with Chrome DevTools MCP, use takesnapshot and focused evaluatescript |
Browser/manual testing |
| Source smoke test | scripts/analyze.sh <path> |
Direct source inspection |
Chrome DevTools MCP's lighthouse_audit intentionally excludes performance. Its navigation mode reloads the page; use snapshot mode when preserving the current authenticated or user-created state matters. The static analyzer is a fast smoke test, not a substitute for a rendered-page audit.
Core Web Vitals — Must pass for good page experience:
Resource Optimization:
srcset.@import.font-display: swap. Preload critical fonts. Subset to needed characters.Loading Strategy:
<link rel="preconnect"> for third-party domains.Perceivable:
<img> has meaningful alt text. Decorative images use alt="".Operable:
Understandable:
lang attribute on <html>.Robust:
Crawlability:
On-Page SEO:
<h1>.Technical SEO:
Security:
Modern Standards:
document.write, synchronous XHR, etc.<!DOCTYPE html>.<meta charset="UTF-8"> as first element in <head>.UX Patterns:
Use the Lighthouse Agentic Browsing results as technical signals for how well assistants can understand and interact with the rendered page.
llms.txt is optional. A valid file may help compatible tools discover curated content, but a Lighthouse pass does not prove that search or AI products will ingest, rank, or cite it.| Level | Description | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | Security vulnerabilities, complete failures | Fix immediately |
| High | Core Web Vitals failures, major a11y barriers | Fix before launch |
| Medium | Performance opportunities, SEO improvements | Fix within sprint |
| Low | Minor optimizations, code quality | Fix when convenient |
When performing an audit, structure findings as:
## Audit results
### Evidence
| Signal | Scope/conditions | Result | Source |
|--------|------------------|--------|--------|
| LCP | URL, phone, p75/28 days | 3.1s (needs improvement) | CrUX |
| Accessibility | URL, mobile navigation | 92 | Lighthouse |
### Critical issues (X found)
- **[Category]** Issue description. File: `path/to/file.js:123`
- **Impact:** Why this matters
- **Evidence:** Measured failure, runtime observation, or source hypothesis
- **Fix:** Specific code change or recommendation
### High priority (X found)
...
### Summary
- Performance: measured status and X findings
- Accessibility: automated status, X findings, manual checks pending/passed
- SEO: X findings
- Best Practices: X findings
- Agentic Browsing: X findings or not available
### Recommended priority
1. First fix this because...
2. Then address...
3. Finally optimize...
### Verification
- Re-run results under the same conditions
- Manual checks completed
- Field validation still pending
For detailed guidelines on specific areas: